Ground game

Deval Patrick’s extreme grassroots approach
By ADAM REILLY  |  October 20, 2006

COMMON GOAL: Deval Patrick in front of his supporters at a rally on Boston Common last weekend.

Forget Deval Patrick’s 5000-person rally on Boston Common last weekend. A humbler event that took place a few days earlier — an October 11 community meeting in Quincy — offers keener insight into the Patrick-campaign ethos.

The set-up for the Quincy affair wasn’t ideal: who wants to leave home (or come straight from work) at 7 pm on a Wednesday night, in the dark, while it’s raining? Just before seven, though, Quincy High School was buzzing. Outside, 30 people held blue-and-white Patrick-campaign signs. In the lobby, tables stocked with campaign materials (sign-ups for phone banks, lawn signs, canvasses, and rides to the polls, as well as fundraising envelopes, absentee ballots, position papers, and bumper stickers) were manned by another two dozen volunteers. In the auditorium where Patrick was slated to speak, 40 people waited on stage in matching Team Patrick T-shirts while a video of Patrick played on an oversize TV. By the time the program started, a couple hundred more people had walked down the aisles (past still more volunteers wearing aprons stuffed with orange Patrick-pledge cards) and taken a seat.

Patrick was running late, so the other speakers were permitted to be even windier than they might otherwise have been. Finally, just as the crowd’s restlessness peaked — lieutenant-governor hopeful Tim Murray was discussing the pending incorporation of Devens, Massachusetts — Patrick made his entrance.

“He’s here!” a woman behind me whispered excitedly. “He’s here!”

Patrick then took the stage and delivered a typically outstanding speech. If you’ve watched Patrick in person and on TV, you know the latter medium isn’t his best showcase: he’s pleasant and sometimes eloquent, but not remarkable. In front of a crowd, though, Patrick is invariably impressive. He treats the audience like a familiar conversation partner, feeds off its energy, and massages its collective ego by reminding listeners — again and again — that everyone present is part of a shared endeavor.

“We’re among family,” Patrick told his audience in Quincy. Then, a few minutes later: “I want you to tell me what I need to know to be a better candidate and a better governor.”

The Quincy meeting pointed up a crucial aspect of Patrick’s campaign. More than any gubernatorial candidate in recent memory, this one has succeeded by methodically building a network of committed supporters in every portion of the state. But does Patrick’s method really offer a blueprint for future candidacies, as some political observers suggest? Or is it a once-in-a-generation anomaly?

Deval's default strategy
With the election less than three weeks away, Patrick’s campaign boasts some remarkable numbers: 8000 volunteers, 22,000 individual donors, 20 offices around the state, 100 canvasses on a good week, 25,000 phone calls each night from Patrick phone banks across Massachusetts. And, of course, there are the numbers from September’s Democratic primary. Conventional wisdom held that Patrick, as a liberal favorite with a passionate base, would benefit from a low turnout, with a heftier vote helping rivals Tom Reilly and Chris Gabrieli. But turnout was much higher than expected, and Patrick got 50 percent of the vote, compared with Gabrieli’s 27 and Reilly’s 23 — a far easier victory than pre-election polls had predicted. And he did it by winning 321 of the state’s 351 cities and towns.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Whither the GOP?, Shadow of a doubt, Same Old Faces, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Scott Harshbarger, University of Massachusetts Boston,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY