Romney's chicks

Mitt's kind of women
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  May 9, 2007

070511_mitt_main

In raising more than $20 million over the first three months of this year, Mitt Romney showed a special touch with the fairer sex — the ones who keep house, anyway. More than $2.5 million of his donations — 12 percent of his total — came from donors who identified themselves as “homemakers,” a Phoenix analysis shows.

Try not to picture Romney as Max Bialystock shtupping old ladies for checks.

That $2.5 million was double the homemaker-donated amount raised by the runner-up in the category, Rudy Giuliani. John McCain was the only other presidential candidate in either party who topped a million. The Democrats, suffering from a significant homemaker gap, all together couldn’t match Romney’s total.

This is no great shocker. Romney previously raised hundreds of thousands of dollars from homemakers for his Commonwealth PAC, primarily from wives of the financial executives and CEOs backing him.

But it’s not just that homemakers give to Romney. It’s that business women don’t. Romney’s long list of donors reveals a remarkable dearth of working women willing to put their hard-earned cash into Romney’s coffers.

Roughly 7100 individuals gave between $1800 and the $2300 maximum allowed by law, accounting for about two-thirds of Romney’s $20 million total. About two-thirds of those big donors were men.

Of the 2400 women, 1060 listed themselves as homemakers. Another 392 listed no occupation at all. Add those who listed themselves as retired, students, or volunteers — and those whom the Phoenix was able to identify as having listed their husbands’ jobs — and the list is down to just 698 women with jobs among Romney’s big donors.

Of those, 82 work for their husbands, and another dozen run their family charitable trusts. Another 173 are self-employed; the most common occupations among them are interior designer, investor, designer, consultant, and artist. Another five work for Romney’s campaign.

Just 426 of Romney’s 7100 big donors, then, are women who work for someone other than themselves, their husbands, or . . . Romney. Many of them have jobs unlikely to leave them with $2300 to spare. And fewer than 250 are employed in finance, management, legal, real estate, or medical positions — unlike the majority of Romney’s male donors. Maybe they’re not his kind of woman. Or maybe he’s not their kind of man.

  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney, Elections and Voting, Politics,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
  •   RED BLUES: SCOTT BROWN EXPOSES THE EMPTY MASSACHUSETTS GOP BENCH  |  February 15, 2013
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN