Cheating rules!

By ADAM REILLY  |  October 3, 2007

These two examples might seem comforting, since they 1) demonstrate that cheating is nothing new, and 2) suggest that quick, harsh punishments can clean things up. But the hard facts of the Year of the Cheater render both arguments moot. First off, thanks to the continued metastasis of what sportswriter Dave Zirin terms the “athletic industrial complex” — a sprawling, diffuse web that includes everything from ESPN to Nike to the New York Times Co., part-owner of your Boston Red Sox — implementing the kind of tough-love approach baseball embraced post–Black Sox is a lot harder than it used to be. Cycling, for instance, can be harsh on cheaters like Landis because, financially speaking, there’s relatively little to lose. On the other end of the spectrum, however, there’s the National Football League (NFL), which makes nearly $4 billion a year from television contracts alone — a revenue stream that wasn’t even conceivable in the Black Sox era. Maybe it’s mere coincidence that the NFL destroyed the evidence it obtained in the Patriots videotaping scandal rather than telling the public what it found. But given the financial stakes involved, it wouldn’t be surprising if the powers that be decided to sweep things under the rug rather than publicize information that might tarnish the league and its latest lucrative dynasty.

Furthermore, while cheating itself may not be new, the technical sophistication involved certainly is. For all we know, Coroebus (winner of the naked sprint that comprised the entire Olympiad of 776 BC) may have rigged his race — and if he didn’t, he could have. But no early-Olympic cheaters had the option of bulking up with HGH. Neither did the Black Sox. What’s more, the Brave New World of sports cheating is only going to get weirder in the coming years. And if the NFL and Major League Baseball can’t handle steroids, how can they possibly cope with gene doping? Or whatever comes next?

This prospect gives pause even to W. Miller Brown, a philosopher and philosophy-of-sport specialist at Hartford’s Trinity College, who’s long contended that the fuss over steroids is excessive. Among other things, Brown argues that there’s no strong ontological distinction between socially accepted performance enhancers — from caffeine to the complex surgeries used to mend athletes’ broken bodies — and those that are verboten. But he also allows that the prospect of genetic manipulation lends new urgency to the question of what is and isn’t acceptable.

“Lurking behind the understandable anxiety and fear about performance-enhancing drugs in sports is the sense that they’re beginning to show us, in a very public, powerful way, a possibility of self-transformation which we’re not yet quite ready to embark on,” says Brown. “Are we scared? Yes. Should we be scared? Yes. Are we afraid what might happen? Yes. Do we know how to direct and control it? No, we don’t.”

Put differently, today’s edgier cheaters aren’t just conspiring to fix games — they’re re-engineering their bodies and, in the process, making us question the legitimacy of every single athletic feat we witness. And they’re just getting started.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Game on, Bonds away, Their cheating hearts, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Basketball, Boston College, National League (Baseball),  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY