Going the distance

With two major contests over and done, the nomination process is coming into clearer focus. Who’ll be the last person standing?
By STEVEN STARK  |  January 9, 2008


So far the media storyline on Campaign 2008 is how extraordinary this year’s race has been, with the process dominated by upsets and a renewed call for change.

But as we all know after Tuesday night in New Hampshire, the press was mostly spinning itself.

In fact, so far, 2008 looks like a somewhat conventional year. It’s not unusual, on the Democratic side, for an insurgent, outsider candidate to challenge the establishment front-runner — as Bradley did Gore, Hart did Mondale, and McGovern did Muskie. It’s only when there is no establishment front-runner that the process changes, as it did in 2004, 1992, and 1988.

For the record, the renegade usually does quite well in an early state or two. Sometimes he even goes on to win the nomination — but sometimes he doesn’t.

As for the GOP, the usual rule is that the person at the top of the public-opinion polls a year before the primary voting begins goes on to win the nomination. Well, guess who was leading those polls a year ago?

John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, in a virtual tie. It still doesn’t look like a terrible bet that the Republican race will come down to those two. And, even if Mike Huckabee makes a run, there are historical antecedents for that, too — going back to the Goldwater–Rockefeller contest in 1964.

None of this means, of course, that the race will be predictable from here on out. Here are the political questions likely to dominate the campaign over the next few weeks.


Yes. Even with a stuttering start, guess who will be the delegate leader at the end of January?


That’s because only a handful of delegates are chosen this month — and Clinton is doing better than Obama among the super-delegate dignitaries that gain automatic admission to the convention and comprise almost 20 percent of the delegate total. February is when the selection of the convention nominee really begins.

As well as he’s doing so far — and despite his surprise loss in New Hampshire, he’s still off to a formidable start — Obama’s problem is that Democrats’ delegates are decided proportionally, by congressional district. That means that even if a candidate loses a state by 60–40 percent, he or she still gets 40 percent of the delegates in the primary. If the split is 55–45 percent, sometimes the rules end up splitting the delegate count 50–50.

So both front-runners can keep the delegate count close, even while finishing second in a number of states. But if the race stays tight, as analysts such as Jay Cost have noted, Clinton has a built-in advantage — due to those super-delegates who are far more likely to support the “establishment” candidate, which is, of course, her. In other words, to win, Obama has to defeat Clinton decisively. A protracted give-and-take primary campaign will likely hand the nomination to Clinton.

Sadly, yes, unless he can somehow find a way to win the South Carolina primary. He won it in ’04 — but that was against a far less formidable field. Without a victory in January, his money will dry up and he won’t get enough votes on February 5 to continue credibly, no matter whether he formally stays in or not.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: See spot run, The shape of things to come, The Final Five, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Elections and Voting,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   DEMOCRATS AGAINST OBAMA  |  November 03, 2010
    Now that the midterm wipeout has concluded, analysts are already sizing up the GOP challengers to a weakened Barack Obama. Not only that: some Democratic party elders are considering the once-unthinkable scenario of a debilitating challenge to Barack Obama from inside his party.
  •   THE INDEPENDENT HERD  |  October 06, 2010
    The big news in this election cycle is the rise of the Tea Party. Fair enough. But passing under the radar is an accompanying development that could have even more far-reaching consequences — the rise of an emboldened third force in our politics.
  •   THE AMERICAN IDOL PARTY  |  September 23, 2010
    Sarah Palin and Christine O'Donnell might not turn out to be good candidates, but they make great television.
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK