Old Mitt of the Mountain

How the Romney campaign crumbled and fell in the Granite State primary
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  January 28, 2010

Mitt Romney had a golden opportunity a week ago to do something about his inauthenticity problem, the one that even his most ardent supporters in New Hampshire recognize. Faced with an obviously disappointing, disheartening loss in the Iowa caucus, Romney could have expressed a little disappointment. Shown that he was a tad disheartened. Like a real human being would have.

Instead, Romney put on that perfect smile of his, and insisted on Fox News Thursday evening that he was pleased as punch with the results. He had won the silver medal, he said. Beaten the big-name candidates. Very pleased.

Having said it once, he had to say it again, and again, to every reporter and in front of every camera, for the next five days — time that he needed to recover before Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary.

There is nothing that comes off as more inauthentic, especially in this post–“Mission Accomplished” world, than someone saying everything’s going great when everyone knows it’s going badly. It’s Ken Lay telling investors that Enron is in great financial shape while he’s selling his shares. It’s “Heckuva job, Brownie” while New Orleans drowns.

It’s exactly what wasn’t going to sell in New Hampshire, against John “Straight Talk” McCain. And it didn’t, as Mitt lost the race on Tuesday night, 37 to 31 percent.

And that night, Romney put on that phony happy face once again. “There have been three races so far,” Romney said in his concession speech. (The third, between Iowa and New Hampshire, was Romney’s victory in this past weekend’s virtually uncontested Wyoming contest.) “I’ve gotten two silvers and one gold.”

New Hampshire notebook. By Margaret Doris.
Coming into New Hampshire, Romney and his strategists seemed determined to confirm the worst stereotypes of the candidate as a poll-driven, market-tested, say-anything, committee-built product. Though no stranger to the term in some of his earlier political ads, he immediately pounced on the buzzword with which the media was interpreting the Iowa-caucus results: a desire for “change.” Like a national corporate brand rushing to market with a knock-off of the latest street fad, the Romney team plastered the new catch phrase onto their old product as soon as his jet hit the tarmac in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in the wee hours of Friday morning. The word “change” flowed constantly from his mouth; Washington was the problem on every issue; Romney was the candidate dedicated — since late Thursday, anyway — to changing what’s wrong in Washington.

“I guess I have to take all the things about him I’ve been calling ‘accomplishments,’ and start calling them ‘changes,’ ” said Claira Monier, a veteran Republican activist and stalwart Romney supporter from Goffstown. She had just attended a Friday “Ask Mitt Anything” event, where Romney used the word “change” several dozen times in a half-hour speech.

Asked whether New Hampshire voters might find something a bit phony about Romney’s obvious glomming onto the suddenly trendy concept, Monier shrugged it off. “Everyone already thinks he’s not authentic.”

By Sunday, the campaign had printed a giant, dark blue “Washington is broken” backdrop; the ability to change campaign themes overnight is one of the many advantages of a bottomless purse. Even some people planning to vote for him laughed at the transparent phoniness of it.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: See spot run, Feeding the rabid right, The morning after, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney, William Weld, Jane Swift,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN