Black like him?

By ADAM REILLY  |  February 11, 2009

For one thing, the question isn't (as Miller suggests) whether we should call Obama black or white — it's whether we should call him black, or biracial, or the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. The latter options are more awkward; they also cater less to the collective urge to pat our country on the back. But if they're more accurate, should that really matter (to the public in general, and to members of the media in particular)?

More important, the notion that Obama clearly identifies himself as African-American is debatable. Sometimes he does — as in a post-election interview with the Washington Post, in which the president-elect exulted: "There is an entire generation that will grow up taking for granted that the highest office in the land is filled by an African-American. I mean, that's a radical thing."

On other occasions, however, Obama has used far more ambiguous self-descriptions. In his celebrated 2004 Democratic National Convention speech, for example, Obama didn't call himself "black" or "African-American"; instead, he spoke of his father's birth in Kenya, his mother's birth in Kansas, and the "diversity of [his] heritage." (For good measure, he also included black and white in his list of illusory divides in American culture.) In his first press conference after the election, meanwhile, the president-elect memorably referred to himself as a "mutt." And in his ballyhooed speech on race in America, he subtly identified with the African-American community — while simultaneously describing his own background in far more complex terms:

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. . . . I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slave owners. . . . I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles, and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents . . .

Identifying as African-American? That's debatable. Here, Obama seems to be identifying as meta-racial — as an individual whose own background renders traditional racial categories obsolete.

To state the obvious, during the campaign, that was a huge political advantage. In her new book on the current crop of convention-busting black politicians, The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama (Doubleday), Gwen Ifill marvels at Candidate Obama's ability to neutralize race as an issue. "It is impossible to overstate how complicated a feat this was to pull off," Ifill argues, "in a nation where the races worship and socialize separately, listen to different music, and watch different television shows."

But it is possible to overstate how complicated a feat this was — if, like Ifill, you treat the "white" half of Obama's heritage as a nonfactor. Remember: during the campaign, black voters could see Obama as one of them, given his skin color, African father, marriage to a black woman, and immersion in Chicago's South Side. But white voters could see Obama as one of them, too — and were encouraged to do so, whether it was Obama eschewing standard racial labels in his speeches or his campaign using Greatest Generation–style footage of his grandparents and their (white) peers in his half-hour campaign commercial on October 29.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Is there 'hope' in Hollywood?, Ask a Black Woman: Harry Reid edition, Uh, race still matters, folks, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Martin Luther King Jr., Dred Scott, Dred Scott,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY