Separate is not equal

Many state benefits, and federal ones, too, are tied specifically to 'marriage'
By DEIRDRE FULTON  |  March 25, 2009

Many people think civil unions might be a workable compromise. But after nine years in Vermont, there's evidence that enough is wrong with them — and right with marriage — to convince that state's Senate to back a civil-marriage proposal by a margin of 26-4 on Monday night.

"Same-sex marriage | Fighting for a basic civil right without repeating other states' mistakes"by Deirdre Fulton.

"The text of the bill | Key sections from 'An Act To End Discrimination in Civil Marriage and Affirm Religious Freedom'"by Jeff Inglis.

Part of what persuaded them was logistical. While civil unions provide state-level benefits (in Maine, there would be more than 300), they don't provide federal benefits (of which there are more than 1000, according to EqualityMaine's Betsy Smith). One example: Civil unions don't make partners eligible for each other's Social Security benefits if one of them dies.

Even more important to many activists is the social and semantic limitation of the term "civil union." That phrase simply has a different connotation than the word "marriage." Regardless of how it's spun, until they have access to the same word as straight couples do — having "weddings," saying they are "married" — same-sex couples operate within a separate sphere.

At this juncture, regardless of how Vermont's Democrat-dominated state House and Republican governor act on the bill, marriage approval in that state is mostly a symbolic change. Until Congress, which passed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, changes its stance on gay marriage, federal benefits will still be held hostage.

Still, the Vermont effort lays the groundwork for organizers in other states, and on a national level. As Don Eggert, the creative director of Vermont alt-weekly Seven Days, wrote in his publication a few weeks ago, "we don't want other states arguing for civil unions. We want them arguing for marriage, so they don't have to go through what we're going through right now and have this debate twice. Let them use us as an example and say, 'They wish they'd called it gay marriage from the beginning.'"

  Topics: News Features , Culture and Lifestyle, GLBT Issues, Special Interest Groups,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DEIRDRE FULTON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   NUMBER CRUNCHERS  |  July 23, 2014
    Maybe instead of devoting still-more resources to food reviews, Maine’s leading news organizations should spend money on keeping better tabs on Augusta.
  •   BLUESTOCKING FILM SERIES SHOWCASES WOMEN'S STORIES  |  July 16, 2014
    Among last year’s 100 top-grossing films, women represented just 15 percent of protagonists, and less than one-third of total characters.
  •   CHECKING IN: THE NEW GUARD AND THE WRITER'S HOTEL  |  July 11, 2014
    Former Mainer Shanna McNair started The New Guard, an independent, multi-genre literary review, in order to exalt the writer, no matter if that writer was well-established or just starting out.
  •   NO TAR SANDS  |  July 10, 2014
    “People’s feelings are clear...they don’t want to be known as the tar sands capitol of the United States."
  •   YOUR GUIDE TO ALL THINGS PRIDE!  |  June 19, 2014
    From the outset, O’Connor says, they were “foward-focused” — they had to be, given that they were basically starting from scratch — and committed to being as inclusive, positive, accessible, and transparent as possible.

 See all articles by: DEIRDRE FULTON