090710_turner

Chuck Turner, Boston
Rough justice for official who seeks to gag media
The problem with attempting to deny others their right to free expression is that you have no moral standing when others deny the same right to you.

Boston City Councilor CHUCK TURNER found that out in January, when federal prosecutors went to court to stop him from talking about the bribery charges he faced following his arrest last November. The gag order was necessary, they claimed, to prevent Turner from revealing the evidence and witnesses against him.

In a surreal letter to the judge, Assistant US Attorney John MacNeil wrote, "Mr. Turner has held a series of press conferences and rallies since he was charged in this matter, aimed in part at bolstering his character and attacking the government's motives for seeking an indictment against him from the grand jury." Imagine that. It's known as defending yourself.

Trouble is, just a month earlier, Turner had written an equally surreal letter calling for sanctions against news organizations that failed to pay fealty to the notion that a person is innocent unless proven guilty. "Mass-media outlets must be prohibited from spreading information that conflicts with the presumption of innocence," Turner wrote to Governor Deval Patrick.

Turner's letter went nowhere. But clearly this Harvard man lacks a grasp of basic civics. Prior restraint — censorship — is a violation of the First Amendment unless it involves a serious breach of national security, incitement to violence, or obscenity. The presumption of innocence is a vital part of the criminal-justice system, but the media are free to conclude otherwise. It may be journalistically irresponsible for a news organization to act as judge and jury, but such behavior is protected by the Constitution.

Turner, with the help of the ACLU of Massachusetts, is fighting the gag order against him. It should be overturned. The idea that he should not be allowed to defend himself in public is outrageous.

But Turner's notion that the media should be gagged from asserting that he's guilty is every bit as outrageous.

<< first  ...< prev  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |   next >...  last >>

6 of 11 (results 11)
Related: Eyes on the prize, Patrick Lynch’s labor problem, Will Caprio’s early ad spree work?, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Barack Obama, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Boston Police Department,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DAN KENNEDY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   A LOOK AT 10 ENEMIES OF FREE SPEECH AND PERSONAL LIBERTIES THROUGHOUT NEW ENGLAND  |  June 27, 2013
    Obama's longstanding lack of respect for the role of a free press in a democratic society reached new depths when it was revealed that his Justice Department had snooped on the Associated Press and Fox News' James Rosen in trying to ferret out leakers.
  •   THE 15TH ANNUAL MUZZLE AWARDS  |  July 13, 2012
    Liberal dreams that Barack Obama would somehow usher in a progressive paradise were always misplaced.
  •   INTERVIEW: RORY O’CONNOR DIGS SOCIAL MEDIA  |  May 14, 2012
    Rory O'Connor has been thinking about trust and the media for a long time.
  •   UNCOVERING THE SINS OF JOE MCGINNISS  |  October 09, 2012
    Joe McGinniss's 1983 bestseller Fatal Vision offered up Jeffrey MacDonald as a modern exemplar of evil: a narcissistic, remorseless monster who beat to death his wife and five-year-old daughter in a diet-pill-fueled frenzy, then coolly killed the only witness, his two-year-old daughter.
  •   THE 14TH ANNUAL MUZZLE AWARDS  |  June 29, 2011
    To understand just how disappointing Barack Obama has been on civil liberties, you need only consider the case of David House, a founder of the Bradley Manning Support Network.  

 See all articles by: DAN KENNEDY