Holy terror?

By ADAM REILLY  |  November 16, 2009

Other liberal commentators did mention Hasan's faith — but only in a cautionary or scolding matter. On November 6, Eric Boehlert of Media Matters for America responded to another mass shooting — in which Jason Rodriguez allegedly shot up the Orlando, Florida, consulting firm that had laid him off two years ago, killing one and injuring five — using Twitter to float a stealth accusation of anti-Islamic prejudice: "Funny, I don't hear ANY media chatter about what religion the alleged Orlando shooter is." The next day, the New York Times editorial page suggested that, for the time being, the public shouldn't even begin to think that Hasan's Muslim identity might have been a factor. As the paper put it: "until investigations are complete, no one can begin to imagine what could possibly have motivated this latest appalling rampage."

It's hard to know which of these disparate perspectives is less convincing. But let's start with the widespread conservative premise that a direct line can be drawn from Hasan's faith to his crimes — which, in terms of its broader implications, is clearly the more menacing of the two.

That premise is so reductive it's comical. According to recent news reports, there are roughly 3500 self-identified Muslims currently serving in the US Military — plus an unknown number of men and women who, like Hasan, are practicing Muslims, but don't identify as such on military paperwork. But by Malkin's own admission, however, the total number of anti-American acts perpetrated by active and former Muslim servicemen and women is in the single digits — including the 2003 grenade and rifle attack in Kuwait by Army Sergeant Hasan Akbar, which killed two and wounded 14.

The question for the aforementioned conservatives is this: if "Muslim soldiers with attitude" are so perilous, why haven't more of them followed the violent path taken by Hasan and Akbar? Are they simply biding their time, waiting for the perfect moment to inflict maximum possible damage? Or could it be that the majority of Muslim servicepersons simply aren't threats?

Religious overtones
Given the ease with which the arguments of Malkin et al. could be used to justify some truly toxic behavior, it's no wonder that so many liberals (as well as some conservatives, including former Bush speechwriter David Frum) have rushed to take precisely the opposite analytical tack. After all, if every American Muslim is a mass murderer in waiting, it's perfectly reasonable to suggest pre-emptive screening of all Muslims in the US military, as Fox News' Brian Kilmeade did on November 6 — and why stop there? Internal investigations of all American Muslims would probably be prudent, too. Internment camps for Islamic Americans — modeled after the facilities built for Japanese-Americans in World War II — might not be a bad idea, either.

But noble intentions can't rescue flawed logic, and any attempts to write Hasan's faith out of this story were similarly doomed from the outset, given the multitude of explicitly religious trappings that marked both his crime and the period of anguish that apparently preceded it. Consider that, according to multiple news reports, Hasan apparently:

* "Equated the 'war against terror' with a war against Islam," said a former classmate, and hired a lawyer in an attempt to exit the Army.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Mr. Respectable, Fourth-estate follies!, Review: Taqwacore: The Birth Of Punk Islam, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Michael Graham, Walter Reed, Eric Boehlert,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY