Review: Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Lord of the bo rings is more like it
By MITCH KRPATA  |  January 20, 2009
1.5 1.5 Stars


VIDEO: The trailer for Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Lord of the Rings: Conquest | for Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 | Rated T for Teen | Developed by Pandemic Studios | Published by Electronic Arts
When New Line Cinema released the first film in Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings adaptation, the sentiment among fantasy fans worldwide was: "Please, please don't mess this up." But from the opening scene, an epic battle at the base of Mount Doom, you could almost feel the weight of millions of geeks' collective worry vanishing into the æther. I had the opposite sensation upon booting up Lord of the Rings: Conquest, the new video game that aims to let players participate in all the major battles in the Lord of the Rings canon. First, panic — "This can't possibly be this awful, can it?" — and then the sinking realization that, yes, Conquest really is that bad.

It's not that the game was ill-conceived from the start. The developer, Pandemic Studios, had been responsible for the well-received Star Wars: Battlefront duo, which mined similar territory within that fictional universe. I didn't play either of them, but given their healthy Metacritic scores and robust sales, Pandemic must have done something right. That makes it even harder to figure out what went wrong here. Lord of the Rings: Conquest botches so many rudimentary elements that I found it a trial to stay interested long enough to complete a single level.

The combination of sluggish controls and a terrible game camera is deadly. The battles are huge in scope, attempting to re-create the scale of some of the movies' most memorable moments. But the camera is locked in closely on your character and doesn't focus on immediate threats. For the most part, you have to control it manually, and your character is apt to be hit by some unseen foe behind him as you spin the camera around trying to figure out what's happening. The sweep of Jackson's carefully orchestrated battle scenes is replaced, in the video-game version, by an incomprehensible mess. In on-line multiplayer modes, especially, epic battles devolve into people chasing one another in circles, Benny Hill–style.

Basic combat is a button-mashing affair with a few combos, but since you can't lock onto a specific opponent, you'll find yourself flailing into empty space while Orcs hurl things at you from off screen. You can choose to play as one of four classes of character: the Warrior is your basic brawler; the Mage can heal allies and generate a magical shield; the Scout can turn invisible and assassinate foes; the Archer is a long-range threat. It's interesting enough to experiment with the different tactics each class offers, but it would have been better to have just one class that was truly fun to play instead of four that are pretty weak. On-line play is the only place it really matters which class you pick, but good luck trying to coordinate with a team of random strangers.

Conquest also showcases one of the more annoying design decisions in recent memory, a disembodied voice that shouts at you in an obnoxious, nonstop monotone about what's happening. The voice changes depending upon the species of your character: as a human, you hear a terrible American attempt at an English accent, but if you commandeer an Ent, you hear the sweet sounds of a marble-mouthed old tree with logorrhea. So is your character doing the talking? Unlikely, since he's constantly saying things he would have no way of knowing. It's bewildering, and maddening. The only respite is to turn off the game.

Related: Fallout 3: Operation Anchorage, Review: District 9, Review: Assassin's Creed II, More more >
  Topics: Videogames , Culture and Lifestyle, Games, Hobbies and Pastimes,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY MITCH KRPATA
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GET ON YOUR SNOW (RE)BOOTS: VIDEO GAME MAKEOVERS IN 2013  |  December 21, 2012
    With the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 now in their seventh and eighth years of existence, they've been around far longer than previous console generations.
  •   THINKING MAN'S ACTION: TOP GAMES OF 2012  |  December 19, 2012
    At some point, it stopped being a trend and became the reality: the most interesting, thought-provoking games aren't mega-budget retail releases, but smaller downloadable titles.
  •   BEYOND SHOOTERS  |  September 18, 2012
    In an era of scripted set pieces and action sequences that are no more than glorified shooting galleries, Dishonored aims to give players the tools to author their own experiences.
  •   REVIEW: DARKSIDERS II  |  September 04, 2012
    "Gentlemen, I'm not going to mince words. THQ is in trouble. We're bleeding cash, and we need a hit game to save our ass. I want you to tell me what you're going to do to make Darksiders II that game."
  •   REVIEW: ORCS MUST DIE! 2  |  August 21, 2012
    We're all happy to see more games that deal honestly and maturely with questions of life and death, and that question the player's role in perpetuating the cycle of violence.

 See all articles by: MITCH KRPATA