LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        


Wednesday, November 28, 2007


ACLU has liberal plot to keep interpreters


The headline on this post is deliberately tongue-in-cheek since, considering the reflexive antipathy held by some for the American Civil Liberties Union, there are clearly those who will see this news release (below) as part of some kind of liberal ACLU conspiracy. Yet aren't those who mistakenly call it "a technicality" when a criminal defendant gets off because of an investigative or legal lapse the same ones who should support the rule of law?

Less than two weeks after Governor Donald Carcieri announced layoffs of four interpreters from the Department of Human Services (DHS), the RI ACLU today revealed that DHS is bound by a consent agreement with the federal government to “schedule interpreters or bilingual staff when necessary” to communicate with clients who have limited English proficiency (LEP), and to have procedures in place “permitting timely and effective telephone communication between LEP persons and DHS staff.”

 

The layoff of all three staff interpreters for the Southeast Asian community, as well as one of only two Portuguese interpreters, raises serious questions about the Department’s ability to comply with the agreement, the ACLU said today. The ACLU also said that recent public comments of the Governor objecting to any state-funded interpreters at the agency casts doubt on his commitment to acting in accordance with federal civil rights laws on the subject.

 

The 1997 agreement between DHS and the Office of Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services addressed complaints alleging that DHS’ inadequate services for LEP clients violated federal civil rights laws. The agreement requires DHS to abide by a number of obligations in addition to those noted above, including training of DHS managers and staff on LEP issues, and displaying notices in various languages in DHS offices about clients’ rights to interpreter services.

      

Last month, the Governor publicly railed against the availability of state-funded language interpreters to help people in the courts and other state agencies, and particularly at DHS. At the time, twenty-two organizations criticized the Governor’s statements for “feed[ing] into the xenophobic atmosphere that permeates the immigration debate in our state.”

      

RI ACLU executive director Steven Brown said today: “Although the Governor has since acknowledged the state’s legal obligation to provide court interpreters, he failed to note that, for decades, federal law has also required the state to supply interpreters in other administrative settings, including for clients at DHS. Interpreters are required in order to ensure that non-English speakers have equal access, in a timely manner, to the critical benefits offered by that agency. His comments make light of both the consent agreement, which he never acknowledged but has a legal obligation to abide by, and the civil rights law underlying it. Aiming his layoffs at the Southeast Asian community seems particularly cruel, since many members of that community are here as refugees, often after having helped the United States military, at great risk to themselves, in the Vietnam War."




Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)

Ian Donnis's take on Rhode Island Politics & Media

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group