LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        


Friday, March 07, 2008


Democrats eye 60 seats in the Senate


Meanwhile, quite a difference from their pre-2006 exile for DC Dems.

For Democrats hoping the November elections set off a seismic shift in Washington, the dream scenario is not just capturing the White House, but also winning a filibuster-proof majority of 60 seats in the Senate — a luxury no president has enjoyed since Jimmy Carter 30 years ago.

As far-fetched as that might seem — Democrats now control the Senate by a razor-thin 51 to 49, thanks only to two independents who vote with them — some Democrats have started thinking aloud that such a scenario is within reach.

From the Northeast to the Southwest, the Democrats have such a strong hand in this year’s Senate contests that they sense the possibility of victories in unlikely states like Oklahoma and Mississippi, and now even Alaska, which last elected a Democratic senator in 1974.

“It’s a remote possibility, but it is within the realm of plausible,” said Paul Starr, a public affairs professor at Princeton University and a liberal commentator.

Numbers help tell the story. Republicans have 23 seats to defend, including five left vacant by retiring incumbents, while the Democrats have just 12, with a competitive race expected only in Louisiana. Even there, the incumbent, Mary L. Landrieu, is still a heavy favorite.

The presidential race, too, seems to cut in the Democrats’ favor. In many states, there has been record voter turnout in the primaries, but far more for the Democrats. About 28.5 million people have voted in Democratic primaries so far, compared with more than 17.3 million in Republican races, said Curtis Gans, director of the Center for the Study of the American Electorate at American University.




Friday, March 07, 2008 10:53:28 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I think it's a little misleading to look at voter turnout in the primaries and judge that the dems will have a stronger turnout than the republicans in November. There hasn't been a race on the republican side in a few weeks and the democrat race is tight. Democratic voters believe their vote means something. A republican vote right now means nothing, so why bother? I think that's more the reason why the D's are turning out in better numbers than the R's right now.
Butchie from beyond the grave
Friday, March 07, 2008 7:25:30 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Mary Landreie a "heavy favorite". Yow, these must be the same people that pedicted Governor York and Mayor Sisto.
Mike
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)

Ian Donnis's take on Rhode Island Politics & Media

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group