LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        


Thursday, March 06, 2008


Henry: no backlash on Fenway's ticket squeeze


080308_soxfan_main

Thanks to the ProJo's Art Martone, who was kind enough to link on his blog to my story this week on the increasingly tough quest for Sox tickets, I learned that John Henry doesn't detect a problem with this issue.

As Michael Silverman reports today in the Boston Herald:

Even with this year’s Fenway Park [map] renovations expected to increase capacity to 38,888, Fenway will continue to be the smallest stadium in the majors as well as having the most expensive ticket prices on average. Henry said that there has been no public backlash with regard to the average working person getting squeezed out by wealthier patrons.

“No we don’t,” Henry said of hearing such potential complaints. “(Fans) know we are determined to spend the dollars to field the kind of team they want to see on a day-to-day basis. Baseball fans here are 162-gamers. They may only attend a handful of games each year at Fenway, but they know we are doing our best to spend their monies wisely. We are able to field championship teams solely because of our fans.”

Apparently, Henry may not have seen this thread at SOSH (or maybe, since the discussion died out within a few days, it's not considered a big deal).

Anyway, it's fair to say that many people in the Sox organization are very aware of the growing unhappiness among fans on the squeeze on tickets.

Back in 2005, Sox PR impresario Charles Steinberg, now with the Dodgers, told me his biggest concern was whether Sox fans were getting squeezed.

More recently, Sox spokeswoman Goodenow, responding to questions via e-mail, focused on describing how the team strives to ensure “that the maximum number of unique fans receive the ability to purchase tickets and experience baseball at Fenway Park.”

The team, which has added a few thousand seats in recent years, is exploring options for more seats, she says.

Goodenow says the team aggressively enforces ticket-buying limits during online sales. Plus, it offers random drawings for some of its most popular offerings, including games with the Yankees and seats in the Monster and roof-deck sections.




Friday, March 07, 2008 11:01:11 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ian-

I read your article and it is the usual that I hear from people who like to go to Sox games regularly. But the parts that I don't understand is why do people think that the law of supply and demand shouldn't apply here too? Some say the Red Sox are charging ridiculous amounts for their tickets. I'd say they're not charging enough. If there is still demand for tickets even after they're all sold, then they could have charged more. The main people who benefit when the team doesn't charge enough is the scalpers. If people are willing to pay $200 for a $100 ticket, the team should get that $200, not the scalpers.

You briefly alluded to it in the story, but what's the alternative? Go back to the days when the best we could hope for was a 3rd place finish? It's really easy to get Bruins tickets now. Wasn't so easy in the Neely/Bourque late-80s. Same thing here. I'd much rather have the Red Sox be a perennial WS contender and not be able to get tickets than have an easy ticket situation and the Sox suck.

Butchie from beyond the grave
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)

Ian Donnis's take on Rhode Island Politics & Media

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group