LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        


Monday, March 31, 2008


Blogs, newspapers, and the media future


The bottom of today's ProJo carries a notice indicating how the daily newsstand price of Rhode Island's dominant daily has climbed to 75 cents, the first such increase in 18 years. Considering the woes of the newspaper industry, this decision was certainly not made lightly.

The problem for newspapers is not that fewer people are reading them. Combined print-Web readership figures are impressive, but newspapers' Web-based advertising is far less profitable than the vanishing amount of dead-tree advertising.

Writing at RI's Future, Forsanri attributes the growth in readership of that site to dissatisfaction with, and distrust of, the MSM. I don't think that's entirely right. While blogs can make a stir with original reporting and commentary, such as Matt's recent post on RI's housing mafia, the blogosphere's growth is more a byproduct of a changing media landscape.

This can be seen in the explosive growth of HuffPost, as today's NYT reports:

When Ms. Huffington, the 57-year-old author and former conservative pundit, announced her plans for The Huffington Post three years ago, many critics dismissed the idea as a digital dinner party for her new liberal friends. But it has grown in ways that few, except perhaps Ms. Huffington herself, expected.

In February, The Huffington Post drew 3.7 million unique visitors, according to Nielsen Online, for the first time beating out The Drudge Report, the conservative tip sheet with which The Post is often compared. On Technorati, a blog search tool, The Huffington Post is the second-most-linked-to blog, behind only the technology site TechCrunch. As Roy Sekoff, the site’s editor, said, “We’ve always wanted to be part of the national conversation.”

When Barack Obama made his first public remarks about his controversial pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., he did so in a post on the site. “It was immediately picked up everywhere,” Ms. Huffington recalled. “It helps to be bookmarked by the mainstream media.” ....

According to one person who was briefed on discussions but was not permitted to speak for attribution, the company has at least looked at the value of the site if it were put up for sale, and a figure around $200 million was used. That would put the price at more than $50 for each visitor, a high valuation. Using the site’s internal figures, 14 million unique visitors for the most recent month, the price would be closer to $15 for each user.

This is well and good. In crisis, there is opportunity, and more Facebook and YouTube-style new media darlings will emerge in the months and years to come.

The danger, at least for now, is how very few blogs come remotely close to producing as much original reporting as dead-tree newspapers -- which are steadily downsizing and shrinking their commitments. Maybe TPM will serve as a model for a new way.

Yet even if Governor Carcieri and some of his supporters don't much like the ProJo these days, we should agree that the paper has long played an important role in rooting out corruption and wrongdoing. The shame will be if this tradition fades over time.




Monday, March 31, 2008 8:19:48 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I'll concede that there are great pieces of journalism from the print media--but they are not frequent enough. One of the tragic mistakes of this generation was overlooked by a complicit media in the run-up to the war in Iraq--the same media that willingly transcribed and amplified White House talking points as Gospel. And so it is fitting that Talking Points Memo has cast the new mold for journalism with a tenacious mindset to challenge the conventional assumptions. Josh Marshall has broken new ground in his work. Were our traditional media to adopt his mindset, perhaps we could be liberated from Britney, Paris, or the rest, and focused on what will make us great again.

Blogs breed equality. What was once a one-way conversation to the uninformed masses has been transformed to a dialogue between the people and the media. And much to the MSM's surprise, we--the masses--are intelligent, enthusiastic, and tired of their ruse. This is not to say that the MSM should cease their work, but rather that we should approach their product with trepidation--knowing that they are fallible, corporate, and in many cases, elitists who compromise integrity in reporting for continued access to power-brokers.

So there is a role for the Providence Journal, because Rhode Island's future depends on their vigilance. Thankfully, we have the Phoenix and your work to goad them into action.
-Forsanri
forsanri
Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:33:14 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
You credit me too much, Forsanri, but thank you for your comments. Yes, the MSM did its job very badly in the runup to the war, and that's why the NYT and WP issued subsequent apologias.
Ian
Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:20:44 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ian
Along those same lines, there was a great piece in the New Yorker last week about the future of newspapers and how blogs can (and cannot) fill them. Lots on the HuffPost.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/03/31/080331fa_fact_alterman/?yrail
MM
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)

Ian Donnis's take on Rhode Island Politics & Media

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group