LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        


Sunday, April 20, 2008


The ProJo gives Rawson his due


When I broke the news last month that Joel P. Rawson, the executive editor of the ProJo, is retiring, Jim Romenesko seemed a bit surprised by the lack of an official announcement from the paper. That comes today, in the form of a fitting tribute by G. Wayne Miller, who gives the venerable editor appropriate credit while also offering a full-bodied picture. Particularly good are the details from some of the former ProJo types who have moved on to other places:

“He knew how to instill excitement in the craft of nonfiction writing; how to make what happened in, say, the Lower Arctic section of West Warwick seem as relevant and as dynamic as anything occurring in Manhattan or in Boston,” said Dan Barry, who was a member of The Journal’s 1994 Pulitzer-winning team and is now with The New York Times. “I wrote a magazine piece once, about a particularly troubling arson case in Providence, and he sent me an encouraging note. The note pretty much changed my life.”

Rawson’s signature impact was first felt more than 30 years ago, when he assigned staff writer Bruce Butterfield, who later moved to The Boston Globe, to write “The one defines all the others,” a front-page Sunday feature about Route 95. Published on Aug. 31, 1975, the piece depicted the highway as more of a character –– or characters –– than a ribbon of asphalt.

Rawson recalled asking Butterfield to consider Route 95, which runs the length of the state, as “its own Mississippi River with its own Huck Finn, its own stories.” Readers were intrigued –– if also, perhaps, initially puzzled — by this unconventional approach. “People wondered if I was out of my mind,” Rawson said, “but they liked it.”

In including some bits on Rawson's temper and his early penchant for screaming from desktops in the newsroom, Miller notes:

Outsiders complained that he was inaccessible, and rarely available to comment to other publications that were writing about The Journal.

Hmmm. Might the reference be to the Phoenix, to which Joel has opted not to talk about 98 percent of the time? A few days after my print followup on his impending depature, for example, he did talk with Editor & Publisher.

Anyway, Rawson, whose last day is April 29, remains a stalwart journalist and a true believer, of the good kind. I wish him well. After having had a huge impact for so long, Rawson, or more specifically, his departure, will leave the ProJo a changed institution.




Monday, April 21, 2008 5:47:18 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Joel Rawson is the man most responsible for the demise of a once great newspaper. Belo's cost cutting and reduction of staff is no excuse for the shocking lack of editorial oversight by management at the Projo. All too often we've seen biased "storytelling" instead of fair and factually accurate reporting. Unfortunately what's written in the Providence Journal these days is no longer accepted at face value, no longer taken as factually sound. Sadly that's Joel Rawson's ultimate legacy. Rawson will forever be known as the architect of a newspaper now known more for agenda driven storytelling than legitimate journalism.
Congratulations Joel!
Linda
Monday, April 21, 2008 12:34:01 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Linda, people can quibble with and critique the ProJo's news coverage, but your condemnation of Rawson is flawed and entirely misplaced. Say what you will about the ProJo, but Rhode Island would be far worse off without it. The paper has long played -- and continues to play -- a leading role in rooting out corruption, fighting for the public's right to know, and shining a light on government. Is it perfect? Obviously not, but what's a realistic alternative at this moment? Also, while the cuts at the ProJo are hardly unique in the newspaper industry, Rawson has long fought for the journalistic mission.
Ian
Monday, April 21, 2008 4:56:01 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ian, you're a member of the brotherhoood so I don't expect you to take a slap at your ProJo brethren. The reality is the ProJo is incredibly selective about their targets and because they're in bed not only with the democratic party but also with major business players here in R.I. they actually do a is very poor job in rooting out corruption. A very poor job! Speaking of poor jobs, Rawson's mission should have been to insure the integrity and quality of reporting at the ProJo instead of promotion of creative writing and storytelling. Maybe a rename is in order? How about The Providence Fable?
Linda
Monday, April 21, 2008 7:36:59 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
In bed with the Democratic party? Linda, you're killing me here.
If the ProJo is in bed with the Dems, endorsing Carcieri twice and endorsing every Republican presidential candidate in my lifetime is a funny way of showing it.
rhody
Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:36:00 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Rhody's right. I'm sure it will come as news to legislative Dems that the ProJo is an arm of the Dem Party. Mike Staton's Gerry Martineau "bagman" story was a virtual blueprint for the feds. There are many similar instances of the ProJo digging out corruption. Linda, perhaps your outlook is colored by your own views as a partisan.
Ian
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)

Ian Donnis's take on Rhode Island Politics & Media

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES

ARCHIVES










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group