LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        

Thursday, April 24, 2008


Mental Detox Week






Happy Mental Detox week! Yeah, so Mental Detox week began on Monday and I have yet to actually turn anything off - or at least the things that AdBusters, who launched the original TV Turn-Off week (now renamed Mental Detox Week) back in 1994, want me to. AdBusters has changed the guidelines to be both more forgiving and more inclusive. Sign of the times: I actually (unintentionally) haven't turned on my TV at all this week, which means if it was still plain-old TV Turn-Off Week, I'd be all "Hey, no problem! I can go without TV easily," but the Internet?! Here's the thing, a job that requires staring at Snap Judgments and bus stop street art on the Internets all day + IFFB + newly downloaded episodes of My So-Called Life, which I can't believe I'm still obsessing over, via Miro + Does seeing live music count? Because I've already done that twice this week = Too Many Complications for Mental Detoxification. FAIL.

Here's what AdBusters wants me to do:

"Today you’re not going to listen to your iPod. You aren’t going to stare at a computer screen any more than you absolutely have to. Today you won’t worry about unanswered email, and you’re not going to login to Facebook. You’ll cut the time you spend on digital devices right down to the bone.

In the evening maybe you will watch your favorite TV show for an hour, but after that you switch off, have a conversation, wash the dishes, read for a bit, and just relax. You do that for five days, and then on Friday night you make a decision to unplug completely for the whole weekend.

For a couple of days you might feel like an addict in withdrawal: peevish, agitated, and distracted. But then something will happen. Your over-stimulated brain will cleanse itself. You’ll relax. You’ll feel calmer, more grounded."

The fact that all of this is posted on a website (and now I'm reposting it on a blog) is sort of cloaked in irony - how are we supposed to spread the word about Mental Detox Week and actually detox at the same time? Smoke signals? Snail-mail chain letters? Don't get me wrong, Mental Detox week would be great if I could take the week off and go camping at Yosemite, gather a group of friends and a cooler of cold beverages (but no road-tripping tunes, of course!!), but I can't. I guess this is just my way of saying "Hi, My name is Caitlin, and I'm addicted to glorious, musical, visually-stimulating technology, AKA mental toxins."

-- Caitlin E. Curran


4/24/2008 12:43:37 PM by Will Spitz | Comments [0] |  




Friday, April 04, 2008


Flashbacks: Woman punished for being a dominatrix, Gloucester’s heroin problem, and Kafka on housebreaking a cat


MASSAGE HERESY
10 years ago
April 3, 1998 | Sarah McNaught looked into why a local massage student was expelled from the Muscular Therapy Institute upon divulging that she was a professional dominatrix.

“Sheila, however, says there is nothing dangerous about her work, which involves various forms of erotic pain or domination. And she is adamant that she does not have sex with her clients.

“ ‘The idea is for me to establish my dominance over them in different ways,’ she explains. ‘Sometimes, for instance, putting a collar on them is enough to give them the sense of submission they seek.’ Whether the scenario involves forced cross-dressing or foot worship, she says, her profession relies on acting out other people’s fantasies. ‘Some people enjoy humiliation and being under my control as a way to escape their everyday lives for an hour,’ she says.

“But from [MTI’s executive director Mary Ann] DiRoberts’s point of view, what Sheila does is not so harmless. DiRoberts believes that potential clients’ opinion of massage therapy will suffer if the public finds out that MTI counts sex workers among its students. The consequence, she says, will be a decrease in clientele for the profession as a whole.”
 
SMACK ATTACK
20 years ago
April 1, 1988 | Ric Kahn reported on Gloucester’s serious heroin problem, finding that one out of 125 Gloucester residents was a junkie.

“Gloucester—Sir Smack blew in from Boston back in ’68...

“He was electric, charming the pants off both the guys and girlies. They’d lie and steal just to spend some time with him, their demigod, for he could stifle their pain. The outnumbered cops tried to bust up the all-night party, kick him out of their seafaring city. But he was hard to keep down. In waterfront barrooms, down on the boulevard near the famous bronze Man at the Wheel, in the bathrooms and basements of turn-of-the-century-double-deckers — he was being introduced all over town. Buddy to buddy, cousin to cousin, husband and wife, brother to sister, generation to generation, his influence spread from Gloucester and its industrial-strength family ties. The former big-city stranger became a downright Gloucester guy, a regular Jones.” Read Full Article

MEAN STREET
25 years ago
April 5, 1983 | William Bennett talked to the New England Athletics Congress chairman for “race walking” Steve Vaitones about his peculiar sport and those who heckle him for it.

“Even more discouraging than automobiles are their drivers — at least for a race walker. Race walkers do look odd, and drivers don’t let them forget it. Vaitones, who is currently spending three hours a day practicing his arm-swinging, straight-legged lope, has plenty of opportunity to collect insults. One of the standard routines goes like this; driver puts beer can in right hand, cranks down window with left. ‘Whatsa matta — your jockstrap too tight?’ Swigs. Guns accelerator.

“Occasionally, though, Vaitones overhears an onlooker reprimand a heckler: ‘Hey that’s hard work. I read about it in an airline magazine.’ “

COMING TO LIGHT
30 years ago
April 4, 1978 | Howard Litwak sifted through Franz Kafka’s Letters To Friends, Family, And Editors.
“Had Franz Kafka’s wishes been carried out, this volume of his letters would never have been published. Kafka asked Max Brod, his longtime friend...to burn his correspondence...after his death. Fortunately for us, Brod chose to ignore those instructions...

“The letters...reveal other aspects of his personality: his forthright and perceptive criticism of the works-in-progress of his friends,... his dissatisfaction with his own writing (to Brod: ‘I am not enclosing the novels (referring to The Trial and Amerika.) Why stir up the old struggles? Only because I haven’t burned them yet?’), his self-loathing (to Klopstock: ‘Must you always be reproving me? Don’t I do that enough myself?’ and later ‘You must simply keep in mind that you are writing to a wretched little person possessed by all sorts of evil spirits.’) Yet he never lost the biting wit also evident in his works. Writing to Brod of trying to housebreak a cat:
 
How hard it is to arrive at an understanding with an animal on this question. There seem to be only misunderstandings, for the cat knows, through blows and other explanation, that there is something undesirable about taking care of her needs of nature, and that the place for it has to be carefully chosen. So what does she do? Well, for example she chooses a spot that is dark, that will in addition show me her affection...But from the human side this spot happens to be inside my bedroom slipper.”


4/4/2008 10:40:14 AM by Ian Sands | Comments [0] |  




Friday, March 07, 2008


Flashbacks: The Romney diet, Censorship on the MBTA, and the Pacification of Cambridge


THE ROMNEY DIET
5 years ago
March 7, 2003 | Kristen Lombardi delved into Governor Romney’s fiscal budget to see who would be hurt most by his balancing act.

“Even before advocates can sort through Romney’s plan and decipher where, exactly, human-services spending has been cut, they’ve noted that, for all the talk of his ‘commitment’ to core services, the governor still manages to balance his FY ’04 budget on the backs of the state’s neediest citizens. For one thing, the governor’s proposal, known as ‘House 1,’ continues what advocates call the ‘reprehensible’ assault on small state agencies providing social services. It hammers away at the Disabled Persons Protection Commission, which investigates abuse in group homes...It slashes away $800,000 from vocational and home-care programs for residents grappling with brain injuries and other chronic disabilities...As MHLAC senior attorney Susan Fendell points out, ‘This is a terribly vulnerable population with great need for someone to go to bat for them and enforce their legal rights to mental-health care.’ ” Read Full Article

END OF AN ERA
10 years ago
March 6, 1998 | Jason Gay discussed the pacification of Cambridge, once Boston’s “Moscow-on-the-Charles.”

“...Cambridge’s progressive fireworks — it’s ‘People’s Republic’ rebelliousness — seem to be going the way of all those mom-and-pop stores on Mass Ave. The new Cambridge is rich and getting richer, less diverse, and (egad) more conservative. Likewise, the new Cantabrigian isn’t the activist type, and is less likely to pay attention to street-level city politics. Sure, people still care about issues like good schools, safe streets, and clean water, but when it comes to political life, Cambridge today has more in common with sleepier, more suburban-style cities like Brookline or Newton than with the Cambridge of old. There are different faces, different attitudes, and shifting priorities.” Read Full Article

FACING RACE
20 years ago
March 4, 1988 | Scott Lehigh observed how presidential candidate Jesse Jackson handled the race issue during a campaign stopover in Hazard, Kentucky.

“There is, of course, the asterisk that clings to Jackson like a shadow, an asterisk that says, in barely discernible subtext beneath the polite print, ‘Of course, though this man is one of the leaders in the polls right now, he can’t win because he is black.’ When a TV reporter asks him if he can win, Jackson is brusque. ‘Let’s concentrate on real substance, which is not race, but economic violence,’ he says. And in yet another Democratic debate in Williamstown, Virginia, he gets the biggest hand of the day with his dignified objection to the question of whether the other candidates let him off easy because he is black. But Jackson is too cagey a politician not to realize this is an issue he must address, and in Hazard he makes a not so subtle point: ‘When GE clears out, when they take away your job, when they take away your farm, they turn the lights out.’ A dramatic pause. ‘And all of us look just alike in the dark.’ ” Read Full Article

SHAME ON THE TRAIN 
25  years ago
March 8, 1983 | The Phoenix reported on a local pro-choice organization that battled the MBTA for the right to advertise on subway trains.

“Hemorrhoids, maybe. Dentures, no problem. But when ad requests for the MBTA trains and buses get ‘patently offensive,’ to quote T spokesman Paul DiNatale, they get rejected...

“The proposed advertising campaign, similar to the one run recently in Philadelphia, points out that, though women from every walk of life have had abortions, the right to abortion could be in jeopardy. According to Marjorie Heins, staff counsel for CLUM, the MBTA management was unhappy with the proposed ads because they didn’t want any advertising featuring the word ‘abortion.’...CLUM pointedly reminded T officials that the two had covered this ground in 1974, when the T refused an advertisement for Preterm, a clinic offering vasectomies, gynecological services, birth-control counseling, and abortions. Preterm promptly went to court...After Preterm won a preliminary injunction, the T backed down and posted the ads. When CLUM recalled that precedent, T officials reconsidered and accepted the latest abortion ads.”

 


3/7/2008 5:06:08 PM by Ian Sands | Comments [0] |  




Monday, March 03, 2008


The Plus Side of Being a Model?




I'm delighted that the Telegraph decided to feature Crystal Renn, an extraordinarily successful plus-size model, in a feature today. But here's what I don't get. This is how writer Judy Rumbold opens her piece:

To be honest, I expected Crystal Renn to be bigger. All right then, fatter. In the mind's eye, the term 'plus-size model' is liberally coated in doughnut batter, and I had her down as a gloriously buxom woman-mountain. Along with a name that sounds as if it's jumped off the embossed-foil cover of a Danielle Steel bodice-ripper, I'm anticipating a formidably blowsy, lipsticky package.

That's the lede that she chose to draw the reader in? Which can only mean, of course, that she assumes that we assume that any story about a plus-size model must be discussing an overweight cow who is just talented enough to be the Big Girl poster child for the commercial side of the industry. Shut The Fuck Up, please -- who are you, Rumbold, the fashion scribe version of the Pick-Up Artist? We don't need to be negged into understanding what you're talking about, lady. What a stupid, dim-witted way of getting to the point. After being told to lose 10 inches off her hips or lose out on a modeling contract, Renn became anorexic. Then:

She soon became withdrawn and neurotic, lying to her grandmother and friends about the extent to which she was starving herself. While everyone close to her thought she looked like death, the agency was thrilled. 'They were, like, "You look fabulous!"' But not quite fabulous enough. With a swimwear shoot looming, she forced herself to work out for nine hours, two days in a row - 'My body literally felt like it was crumbling' - before seeing her bookers again. 'They looked me up and down and said, "Your legs. You need to bring your legs down."'

Renn switched her contract to Ford. Since gaining back her normal weight -- she is a hot, curvy 20-something who gives ScarJo a run for her money -- she's appeared in Vogue, and, has shot ads for Saks, Nine West, and other assorted editorial campaigns. But how nice that no matter how far she's come, the Telegraph can't simply call her a size 16. They have to call her a "healthy" size 16, with the subtext of "healthy" meaning large. You know, fat. But pretty all the same!

This is gross, gross, gross, and terrible, particularly after Ali Michael was shunned over her "fat" legs in Paris last week. Thanks, Telegraph, for feeding the clusterfuck. You know things are right with the world when teenagers are giving themselves body dysmorphic disorders over five pounds.


3/3/2008 5:59:32 PM by Sharon Steel | Comments [1] |  




Thursday, February 28, 2008


When A Size Zero Simply Isn't Good Enough



Model Ali Michael, backstage at Anna Sui, via Style.com

Christina Binkley's style piece in today's Wall Street Journal arrived just in time to close National Eating Disorders Awareness Week -- and also to remind me of the fact that as much as I love fashion, shit is fucked up.

Ali Michael is 17-years-old. You may have recalled seeing her pose half-naked in this T: Style spread that offended a great many people. Or perhaps you just saw pictures of her stomping down the runways at countless major shows last year. Suffice to say she was hailed as a great new talent, or, as the Journal puts it, "last season's model du jour." Indeed, the spotlight never shines for long on one pretty girl.

This season, after gaining five pounds, Miss Michael was told by casting directors for the runway shows that her legs were too plump, according to her mother, Mary Ann Michael, who travels with her daughter to appointments and shows. And so, after doing a string of major supermodel shows in September, Miss Michael snared only the Yohji Yamamoto show in Paris this time around. After walking the runway, her eyes blackened with corpse-like makeup, she said she was sad to be leaving but grateful to Mr. Yamamoto. "This show is special," she added.

What is wrong with our culture?

While I tend agree with writer Aimee Liu (Solitaire, Gaining: The Truth About Life After Eating Disorders) -- who I interviewed over here yesterday -- that the fashion industry shouldn't be held solely responsible for the pervasiveness of eating disorders among young women, I'm horrified by how hard it toils to shatter this notion. For one every one, tiny step forward, we're rebuked with an entire roadtrip's worth of steps back. It's shameful. It's embarrassing. And it's unforgivable. Bravo has done a lovely job of orchestrating a continued search for the next great American designer. What about the way current American designers look at the things they're creating and the stereotypes they're falling victim to?

But it isn't fair to just blame a few designers. In the U.S., France and Italy, casting directors, fashion designers, show overseers and fashion magazines move en masse, and no one is using models who look like models did 20 years ago. In her day, the aptly named Twiggy seemed wildly thin -- but she would look oversized on today's runways.

It's hard to imagine Miss Michael, a willowy, 5-foot-9-inch teenager, being told her legs are too fat. Last season, Miss Michael made herself sick keeping her weight down, said her mother. Miss Michael's reward was to be heralded as the next supermodel.


I make a point of never apologizing for the fact that I believe fashion is an art form. But when read things like that, or awful, depressing things like this, I ask myself how I plan on justifying my adoration for something so beautiful that seems to take such delight in perpetuating its own sickening image.

Lame.


2/28/2008 3:03:39 PM by Sharon Steel | Comments [0] |  




Wednesday, January 23, 2008


Project Runway: the cold, hard facts


I just discovered this handy, helpful chart on the Project Runway Season 4 wiki page, whilst dreamily envisioning what fashion challenges our beloved contestents might encounter on tonight's episode. (Who needs writers when we've still got the two best shows on television, Proj Run and History Detectives?). [Ed. note - You're a writer.] Oh, right. Nevermind. I <3 writers. Anyway, here's the chart:



This is the squinty, mini version, of course. For the real thing, look here. So, let's get out our pointers and consult the cold hard facts of the chart, shall we? Judging solely on wins, Christian, Jillian, Rami and Victorya seem to be the top contenders, although Kevin ranked high scores for four out of seven challenges - but now he's out. My money for winner is on Jillian or Christian, even though he's ranked low on two challenges - the judges just don't understand sometimes, ya know? I mean, Nina Garcia never changes her effing hairstyle! Does anyone else notice this? Why is it always down? Never a casual ponytail, or maybe a Chanel scarf. Nope, nothing - totally boring. And Heidi flops between dramatic hairstyles like they're sticks of Juicy Fruit. Nina, it's a show about fashion, live it up a little! How can we trust you in that repetitive, vanilla 'do? I digress, back to investigating the chart. The next one out, according to lowest scores, should be Rami (Rami! He's so complex), Sweet P (but I'd miss her funny commentary!), and Ricky. Ah, Ricky. How has he possibly made it this far? Is he bribing someone at Bravo? Does nobody notice these horrible mesh, male escortish police hats he wears every day? I'll bet you $15 worth of Mode fabrics that he'll be out tonight. I miss Kit already.


1/23/2008 11:42:00 AM by Caitlin | Comments [0] |  




Thursday, October 18, 2007


The absurdity of the Body Mass Index


Kate Harding — “a Chicago-based writer, editor, crazy dog person, humorless feminist, aspiring yoga teacher, recovering grad student, and blonde,” according to her blog — has ingeniously skewered the standards imposed by the Body Mass Index (BMI). What she has done is to post to Flickr a slideshow showcasing women (well mostly, anyway, there's a few men as well as a cat up there) of all sizes. Atop these photos she simply categorizes them according to the index’s calculator. The results are maddening and staggering. Have a look.

                 Laurie is "overweight."


10/18/2007 1:03:34 PM by Ian Sands | Comments [3] |  




Thursday, October 11, 2007


Leaf-peepers need a hobby. A real one.


When I first heard about the idea of “leaf peeping,” I thought it was a joke. It was in an episode of Family Guy, as I recall, and as I had never spent an autumn in New England, I could only assume that the “hoards” of tourists who descend like Hellfire on the Northeast “to watch the leaves change color” was some kind of hyperbolic mockery of people with a severely bastardized concept of both nature and vacations…

So it is with incredulity that I look at the Boston Globe and see that Columbus Day was Maine’s 2nd biggest tourism weekend because of the some 700,000 carloads of people, apparently eager to take their three-day weekend and go peep some leaves.  Similarly, Eileen Ognitz at CNN International offers some ideas on how to keep the kids entertained on your leaf-peeping trip, and the Aspen Times sadly reports to it’s citizenry that the 2007 Leaf Peeping season is past it’s peak.

Where’s the jocular ridicule? Gentle scorn? A stray facetious compliment or an underhanded jab? Far be it from me to condemn someone’s fetish, dendrophelic or otherwise, but has leaf-peeping moved so far into the mainstream that journalists can’t mock it publicly? Seriously: leaf-peeping? Yes, it's pretty, but that's a perk, not a reason. That's like paying $2200 to stay at the Ritz Carlton because they put mints on your pillow.


Holy Shit.

I get nature. It’s splendid, and I readily concede that a picture of the Grand Canyon cannot begin to substitute for being there, toeing the precipice, wind in face, sun on back, etc. But there is a sense of grandeur involved in such things, and I have a hard time imagining that a red leaf is that much better than a picture of a red leaf, so much so that it would be worth a 3-day weekend that could be spent watching baseball or… you know… doing nearly anything else.

-- Jason O’Bryan


10/11/2007 12:48:10 PM by phloggist | Comments [0] |  




Monday, October 08, 2007


Newsbreaks of the Century Award: Jeffrey Toobin


One of the traditions at The New Yorker that has continued unabated by tables of contents, photographs, bylined Talks of the Town, and other heady incursions of late-20th-century magazining is the "newsbreak" -- the wry, lightly condescending filler blurbs at the tail end of select New Yorker stories in which the magazine's copy-editing staff, having plowed through its 3,000-word feature for the afternoon and availed of no better way to entertain itself, takes to excerpting the copy-editing malapropisms of lesser publications. E.B. White once said, "I still regard newsbreaks as the thing I came to earth for." White even edited a book-length collection of newsbreaks; in later years, the tradition spawned an entire genre of shitty late-night comedy bits (see "Jaywalking").

The newsbreak is such a New Yorker hallmark that, when we came across page 63 of frequent New Yorker contributor Jeffrey Toobin's Supreme Court tome The Nine, we wondered whether Toobin hadn't edited in a newsbreak just to get another mention of the book wedged into his magazine's hallowed pages. If so, it would be the meta-est newsbreak of all time: a New Yorker writer caught in a malaprop involving The New Yorker. (Remember, all, that italics are reserved for publication names, albums, and the titles of creative works.) In the style, then, of a New Yorker newsbreak, we give you the Newsbreak of the Century:

HOOPLA DEPT.

"[In picking a list of potential Supreme Court nominees] the names of several nonjudges came up, but it quickly became clear that [Bill] Clinton was most interested in one of them -- Mario Cuomo, then governor of New York.

Clinton and Cuomo had a complicated relationship. Clinton admired The New Yorker's way with words but found his indecisiveness maddening."

We never liked him either, Bill.

For all you bookworms, Toobin discusses The Nine on Wednesday evening at the Brattle Theater, in conversation with local lega-eagle Alan Dershowitz. Tickets available through Harvard Book Store.


10/8/2007 3:05:03 PM by Carly Carioli | Comments [0] |  




Tuesday, September 25, 2007


YouTube videos to air with ads in 2008


I guess we all should have seen this coming: YouTube is sticking ads on to its videos next year.

On the surface, it seems like this might bring the site's popularity down a shade, but then again, Google has a history of creativity when it comes to this stuff. Who knows. Maybe this stab at legitimacy will incite more companies to open their video vaults.

Because this blog entry needs to run with a video, here's "Stop the Planet of the Apes, I Want to Get Off!"



9/25/2007 9:55:21 AM by Ryan Stewart | Comments [0] |  




Wednesday, September 12, 2007


The Patriots' videotaping scandal: Let's all take a deep breath here




I'm not sure there's any way I can attempt to take a rational look at the recent revelations of the Patriots' videotaping tactics in a way that will make me look like anything but a homer, but I'm going to try.

What happened on Sunday was against the rules. And the Patriots got caught doing it. Whatever penalty the league decides to hand down in this case will have to be something we as fans accept and move on. It's only fair.

That said, let's not go overboard here. This is not "the worst NFL scandal yet."

Here's the thing: if the team's reputation for these antics was truly as widespread in the NFL as people like Mike Tomlin and LaDanian Tomlinson have been saying, then shouldn't teams have prepared accordingly? Hell, in that same article in which Tomlin discusses the simmering backroom discussion of the Patriots "family" and their usage of underhanded video, an unidentified Steelers coach says words to that exact effect:

One assistant said the Steelers changed their defensive signals whenever they played against New England because of their suspicions
And, let the record show, that since 2001, the Steelers' video-counter strategies have led to exactly one win over the Patriots. So were the Steelers the only team doing something like this, and poorly at that? We somehow doubt it, especially if the cameraman was as blatant as the photo document suggests.

Compare these hijinks to baseball, in which stealing signs is common. As a result, teams think ahead, and do things like cover their mouths in conferences on the mound (like Joe Kerrigan used to do when he was the Sox' pitching coach) or, more simply, change their signs during the game. Also, consider Tampa Bay coach Jon Gruden, who beat the Raiders in the Super Bowl thanks to his advance knowledge of the Radiers' playbook (from when he was the Raiders' coach) - was that somehow unsportsmanlike?

We're not trying to completely exonerate Belichick. Certainly his bending of the rules in this case was a little sleazy, following a pattern of sleazy behavior dating back some time. And we can understand why the legions of Patriots non-fans are enjoying this right now, and we don't blame them for that. But at the same time, any team that wants to blame their losses to the Patriots entirely on some video tape is going to come off reeking of sour grapes. Those teams probably should have prepared better for such things.

UPDATE: King Kaufman says it better than I could.


9/12/2007 5:20:03 PM by Ryan Stewart | Comments [0] |  



INFO

RSS 2.0

Bostonizing the Blogosphere

RECENT
Mental Detox Week
Flashbacks: Woman punished for being a dominatrix, Gloucester’s heroin problem, and Kafka on housebreaking a cat
Flashbacks: The Romney diet, Censorship on the MBTA, and the Pacification of Cambridge
The Plus Side of Being a Model?
When A Size Zero Simply Isn't Good Enough
Project Runway: the cold, hard facts
The absurdity of the Body Mass Index
Leaf-peepers need a hobby. A real one.
Newsbreaks of the Century Award: Jeffrey Toobin
YouTube videos to air with ads in 2008
The Patriots' videotaping scandal: Let's all take a deep breath here
ADVERTISEMENT

CATEGORIES