Sign up for Friends With Benefits
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:16 AM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Sex (Circa 2006)

pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
8/2/2006 4:57:01 PM

“Men have gotta be decisive,” theorizes one openly gay Harvard sophomore about why straight-leaning guys don’t tend to identify in more flexible terms. “I personally haven’t come in contact with it, but I’ve seen it on the Internet,” he says about straight-identifying males who’ve dabbled in same-sex oral. “But a friend of mine overheard these two guys getting close at a party, and one of them said, ‘When I’m sober, I’m straight; when I’m drunk, I’m gay.’ ” Perhaps once the Girls Gone Wild franchise discovers the trend (some might say the multi-million-dollar amateur-porn empire had a hand in spreading the popularity of the straight-girl kiss), more guys will start fessing up.

Another apparently touchy subject is chastity. In terms of keeping quiet about sexual experience (or lack thereof), virginity is the new promiscuity. Kim Airs teaches sex ed–type seminars at a handful of local colleges and estimates that she’s been quietly approached about virginity eight times in the past few months. “There’ve been times that women give me the can-you-come-over-here thing, and I’ll go off in a corner and I’ll talk to them,” says Airs, who has led tutorials at Harvard, BU, Suffolk, and Wheelock within the past six months. “What I’ve been asked — and this is something that fascinates me — I’ve had quite a few young women say, ‘I’m still a virgin and my boyfriend and I want to have sex. What do you suggest to make it less painful?’ ”

What was a “friend with benefits” in high school becomes a “fuck buddy” in college. STDs are a very real concern, with AIDS a fear in the background and herpes in the foreground. The Internet obviously makes it much easier to flirt, hook-up, or prowl. And in a Google world, the only people who wouldn’t mind their moms or employers or prospective dates finding their names beside a quote about being on the receiving end of a “beejay” tend to be exhibitionists — which is a big reason why the following subjects aren’t identified by their real names. They’re also not meant to represent the entire sexual spectrum (note the lack of “furries”). But these people are plenty real: they’re your buddies, neighbors, acquaintances, classmates, exes, and MySpace friends. And they all, in some form of another, like to have sex.

Oral doesn't necessarily count
SM, 25, 14 previous partners

Jarred is the sort of guy who’s always consorting with cute, Converse-clad ladies at rock shows or flirting with courier-bagged women at bars. Active in the local art and music scenes, he’s definitely not a locker-room jock, but the Allston resident answers sex survey–type questions with self-aware, yet stereotypically male, responses. Ask Jarred if he masturbates daily, and he scoffs: “Yes, c’mon, I’m a dude.” What does he think about? “I dunno, past experiences that’re memorable, experiences that you think could happen, people way out of your league. It’s a spank bank — every dude’s got one. You just look through the Rolodex until you get something you like.”

Jarred has slept with 14 women, three of them in 2006. He considers these stats “norm to low norm” for his age and views his sexual history as fairly typical. He’s been in three serious relationships in the past four years, hasn’t ever cheated, has had sex in a few public places (including a library bathroom), and once had an oral threesome with two girls. “We all thought each other was attractive, we happened to be in the same place, and all of our pants happened to come off. And then once that happens, what’re you gonna do? Play Nintendogs? No, you’re getting a beej.”


ADVERTISEMENT



And Jarred is pretty sure his oral-sex history is also standard for twentysomething single men: about 30 partners, or more than twice the number of people he’s actually slept with. “Beejays are just more common,” he declares. “No one really wants to be the person who has sex on the first date. But if things are going well, and both parties are really into it, it’s the classic [situation]: you’re making out and all of a sudden, there’s a lot of missing clothing, and you’re like, ‘We shouldn’t do this.’ ”

There’s no going back from actual intercourse — and oral doesn’t necessarily count. “[Once] you cross that, there’s no talking your way out of it. You did it.” Besides, he points out, most people see oral sex as making a person less vulnerable. “When you’re really getting into having sex, your arms are flailing around, and you’re muttering shit, and if it’s really good, you have no idea what’s going on. And that level of personal intimacy is still something that’s kind of private. And that’s something you maybe don’t want to share with everybody.” He pauses. “But then again it’s weird because [oral] is also arguably more intimate. You’re right there — you’re staring at it.”


pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




I just can't believe that sex in our society has become so impersonal. If this is really the current state of sex amongst 18-34 year old singles, the atmosphere is ripe for STDs to spread. The real problem is the uncoolness of not having sex, as if you're denying yourself something that's your right. Sex with the right person is worth waiting for.

POSTED BY Veector AT 05/31/06 9:00 AM

I disagree that sex has become impersonal. I think it's a good thing that today's youth are less sexually repressed than generations from before. Just because they seem more vocal doesn't mean that they are ripe for disease or otherwise sex-crazed whores. Sex is a good thing and I'm happy that society has seemed to outgrown the 'sex is dirty' mindset.

POSTED BY projconn AT 06/12/06 7:11 PM

One cannot say sex has or has not become impersonal; everyone treats it differently. As long as people are enjoying themselves in safe ways (not harming themselves or others), their sexual preferences and practices are natural and their own business. Granted, not everyone is safe, and that is unfortunate. But someone who fools around with twenty people in one month could be using protection while another person who has 1 partner in/for six months may not. These kinds of generalizations, assumptions, and judgemental mentalities (positive +/or negative) are unnecessary, unfair, and couldn't possibly be accurate for everyone in an entire group of people.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/21/06 2:50 PM

But that's my point, if people continue to behave in a medically risky and unsafe way, it's everyone's business, because eventually, society pays the price. Also, the attitude shift of people towards sex and how young girls and guys are anxious to lose their virginity makes sex less meaningful. Doesn't that deserve some kind of commentary? And towards the point that someone using protection is more safe than someone else, that used to be the case when just transfer of seminal fluid was enough to get you an STD, now herpes and other STDs can be spread with even just oral-to-genital contact. Celebrating or encouraging the freeness of a non-monogamous lifestyle is detrimental on so many levels.

POSTED BY Veector AT 06/26/06 10:01 AM

This all has to do with a serious lack of education about sex and it's consequences. Monogamy is not for everyone and boxing people in is just as detrimental to the human condition. Promoting abstinence, which is the preferred means of birth control for our conservative administration, is ineffective. The fact that today's youth learn sexual ideas and behavior from TV is serious cause for alarm as well as the administration's blatant disregard for research in favor of subjective morality. And that's not opinion, that's research.

POSTED BY projconn AT 06/28/06 9:02 PM

Well said.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/29/06 12:45 AM

Well said.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/29/06 12:45 AM

"Monogamy is not for everyone" Are you kidding? I'm not trying to promote abstinence. I'm just saying that young girls and boys, when they're ready to have sex, do it in a safe way and stick with their partner for long periods of time. I don't believe in having sex just for fun.

POSTED BY Veector AT 06/29/06 11:37 AM

Lack of education my ass. I apologize if "inappropriate" language is discouraged here; there was no ToS at registration to throw that in my face, so I'll be loose tounged for now. Let me know if it is, please. Now for my say; as a literate, non-judgemental, introvertive and "libido-less" fifteen year-old, I feel it neccesary to mention something. There is education. Fact is--when it's being taught to you in eighth grade when half the kids in the class have already "done it" , "bare back" or "under cover", by an over-weight, extremely humourful woman who, though very nice, looks like she hasn't been laid or plans to for years...Who do you think is going to listen? The education is there, it's simply unheeded. The more you try to push today's teenagers, the more they're going to turn their backs on you; they'll feel that, rather than taking them seriously and treating them like adults--which in a way, you actually are--you're trying to shelter them. Because honestly...when you were that age, wouldn't you rather listen to jimmy with the sweet talk and the killer smile than your old man? But you're right. Sex has gotten alot more like a trend or "the thing to do" than something meaningful or sacred. I pity those who don't care about it, or use it as a tool--but honestly? It's their business, and not anyone elses. Sure, you can blame the AID's epidemic on nonmonagomous teens and careless adults, but you have to think about it. Even the most careful people can catch it--it's that one time that makes the difference. And Veector--the world is moving into an odd generation that promotes oddities as much as it promotes straight-edge. The world is trying to become more "out of the box" and "free-thinking", and the fact that people with mindsets like yours exist is one of the reasons it is trying so hard. It's the age-old cycle of one generation trying to differentiate, become its own self. Sex has become a game. Sexuality has become fluid--as said in the article, I believe--and the lines and drawers and boxes or whatever you care to define the differences as, are becoming more and more blurred as time goes on. But not all teens or adults are sex-crazed fiends. It's true that the majority experiments alot more, but like I said; the lines are being blurred. And so what? If it leads to everyone really finding out who they are and feeling more comfortable about it, great. Less gay teen suicides. So, I believe this is a good thing, this...evolution. I do wish that people would be more careful, yes. But when there is the availability to protect and still have "fun", why try to hamper people in and say "monogamy only"? Hopefully, like an experimental "tween" or "teen" or even college student, this generation will discover itself, define itself, and start being more "mature" in its decisions. That's all I've got to say, but I hope you listened instead of just ruling me off as "just another teen". There are those of us that think before we act.

POSTED BY [-Scorpio-] AT 06/30/06 3:49 AM

Also, I apologize for that humongous chunk of text. This is my first time using the site, so I didn't realise it didn't recognize paragraphs.

POSTED BY [-Scorpio-] AT 06/30/06 3:51 AM

I understand your points. I can see that change is always in the wind from one generation to the next, but change is not always a good thing. When you talk about vast changes in culture, these are the types of things that can eventually lead to the disintegration of a society. I'm not just talking about sex, it's about a lot of things, but sex is one of those things. I agree that what everyone does is their own business and I'm not suggesting that there should be legislation to stop anyone from doing anything sexually in their own private lives. I'm just commenting that I feel that this kind of behavior is too risky. It doesn't matter how protected you feel, when culture relaxes and lets dangerous behavior become socially acceptable, the family suffers, society suffers. I don't see it as an out-of-the-box version of thinking vs conservativism. I see it as a "why don't we promote safe behavior" vs "glorifying our freely sexual culture because it feels good". I think that's a very irresponsible type of line to take.

POSTED BY Veector AT 07/10/06 9:38 AM

I'm glad that the people interviewed were able to come to terms with their sexuality, and that they were able to find other people who were willing to help affirm them in this way. In my case, I could not find anyone to so affirm me when I decided at the age of 33 that it was time to get the job of handing off my virginity done - despite the fact that no one had ever offered. To avoid the looming risk of suicide because of the self-perception of not being desirable to anyone, I went to a licensed brothel in Nevada. Looking back, and based on additional information and research since then, I would urge anyone else trapped in the unfotunate situation I was in, I would suggest that they instead see a surrogate. Surrogates always work together with a psychotherapist, which would have been a lot more beneficial to me than the (at first) disbelieving licensed prostitute I hired. She eventually did believe my situation of being a late-blooming virgin, but again, it would have been nice to have been affirmed from the start.

POSTED BY GentlemanBear AT 07/25/06 7:18 PM

I'm surprised you didn't mention about sagging. We've really lowered way down to our butts now at the back and pubes at the front

POSTED BY razor AT 08/04/06 8:19 PM

This is a test. <p>This is only a test</p> <p>If this were a real emergency, you would have been instructed to return to your nearest balm shelter. End of massage.

POSTED BY TwoFourFixate AT 08/26/06 5:30 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group