Sign up for the Phoenix Newsletter
Sign up for the Phoenix Newsletter
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Friday, August 18, 2006 2:37 PM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

The guns of Boston

pages: 1 | 2 | 3
7/6/2006 12:07:06 PM

Supply aplenty
Criminal-justice researchers talk about supply-and-demand solutions for reducing gun prevalence in violent areas. But at least for now, cities like Boston will have to focus on the demand side, because the availability of cheap, black-market guns is not going away any time soon. Efforts to block that market are being effectively squashed: there is a concerted national political effort, driven by the gun industry and the National Rifle Association (NRA), to ensure the survival of the black market for handguns.

That claim has nothing to do with leftist, gun-hating paranoia or with legitimate gun ownership. The gun industry needs to sell roughly two million handguns in the US every year, and it simply could not do that if the black market were to wither. Legitimate handgun owners rarely need to buy new guns; the industry’s profits require more repeat-business customers.

Street criminals fit that bill: they tend to use cheaper guns that malfunction or fall apart; their guns get confiscated by police; and they occasionally ditch guns that could link them to specific shootings. Plus, criminals periodically upgrade from embarrassingly uncool models to ones that better reflect their desired stature and power.

This is one reason why Menino’s “Aim for Peace” gun-buy-back program is probably doing more harm than good. Very few people use these programs to turn in their only gun. But those who turn in a weapon receive, in effect, a “no-questions-asked” $200 trade-in toward an upgrade (in the form of a Target gift card) — helping street criminals move up to more accurate, powerful, and concealable weapons.

Let’s say you currently carry a cheap, 1990s-era Lorcin, Bryco, Raven, or Phoenix handgun — as many on the streets of Boston do, judging by what the Boston Police Department typically confiscates. With $200 for your trade-in (probably more than you paid for it; the median price paid in recent years for a handgun in the Chicago black market is $150, according to a study released last year), you’re halfway to a refurbished Glock 22 semi-automatic with two 10-round magazines, currently on Super Special for $399 at Four Seasons Firearms in Woburn Center — home of the “Glock Wall” of pre-owned handguns. Or, if you’re looking for a smaller, easily concealed weapon, you can get a 15-ounce 637 Smith & Wesson .38; a 2004 Guns & Ammo “Gun of the Year” Ruger 45 ACP double-action; or a hot-selling Sig Sauer Mosquito, with adjustable sites and sliding ambidextrous safety — perfect for the southpaw gangbanger.


ADVERTISEMENT



Of course, these guns probably cost a little more on the street, because most of the buyers — thanks to their age or their criminal record — are unable to buy them from a legitimate gun dealer.

That’s where the black market comes in, which functions in two ways. One is through “straw purchasers,” who buy guns legally on behalf of those who cannot, often in other states with more lenient laws. The other is through theft. More than a half million firearms are stolen every year in the US. In fact, some in local law enforcement tell the Phoenix that handguns have become the most desirable item for burglars, because they are small, valuable, and easily sold.

In Boston, these guns are often filtered to the streets through “brokers” who have graduated from gang life, according to recent court filings of federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ABF) agents. These brokers — many of whom live in the suburbs — buy guns from straw purchasers and thieves, and sell them to gangbangers who take them back to the streets, to use or resell.

Many believe that if public policy could significantly reduce straw purchasing and gun thievery, it would raise the black-market price of guns, thus reducing their presence on the street. However, gun manufacturers and the National Rifle Association’s friends in the Bush administration, Congress, and state governments, have worked hard in recent years to keep the pipelines to the black market open. Theft-deterrent gun locks and “safe storage” laws that reduce theft are not widespread; federal prosecutors, including Boston’s Michael Sullivan, rarely prosecute for firearm theft; and inspection of licensed gun dealers suspected of selling to prohibited buyers has virtually ceased. Since George W. Bush took office, the ATF has hidden its treasure-trove of national gun-crime tracing data from the public and researchers, as detailed in a report by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, released this April.

Menino’s current attempt, along with that of Michael Bloomberg of New York, to use a “Mayors’ Summit on Illegal Guns” to formulate and lobby for nationwide policy changes is well intentioned. But its effects won’t be felt for many months, if not years.

Threats unheeded
If the supply can’t be stopped, what can be done about demand? Philip Cook, co-author of the “Aiming for Evidence-Based Gun Policy” study, believes that criminals and gang members ultimately make rational choices about carrying guns. If costs and liabilities were to rise, fewer would carry them, he says.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




You wrote that illegal buyers would favor the, "hot-selling Sig Sauer Mosquito, with adjustable sites and sliding ambidextrous safety — perfect for the southpaw gangbanger." Maybe you're not too familiar with guns and shouldn't really be writing about them. The Mosquito is a .22 rimfire target pistol, too big to conceal easily and at the bottom of the power scale of handguns.

POSTED BY bigiron AT 07/11/06 9:48 PM

>> So one way to curtail demand is to intensify the downsides of illegal gun-ownership, in any number of ways. But attempts to increase liability — more arrests for gun possession, for instance — have failed to change behavior. So it sounds like you believe in the law of supply and demand. Here's an idea- increase the supply of guns to law abiding residents so that they can protect themselves, decrease the threats of being raked through the muck for criminal acts such as shooting a home invader or burglar looking for an illegal gun. How many of the guns used in violence as mentioned in your article were owned legally? How many legal guns would be stolen if burglar knew the risk of getting shot dead while trespassing in the middle of the night in someones home was over 50%? How would you feel about having more police protection available to patrol your community because legal law abiding citizens weren't forced to telephone them and wait for action, but could actually help make their neighborhoods safer by removing a criminal from the streets? The way I see it, this experiment in gun legislation is a failure, and instead of looking at the evidence- that these gun crimes are not committed using legally registered guns by legal gun owners, people look at the roundabout arguement- but a legal gun is one that can be snatched. The real problem is violence. If someone wants to be violent, the tool they have at hand is almost immaterial. We need to either keep people from desiring to be violent or remove the violent people. Gun control not only misses the point completely, it is a waste of resources and makes the problem worse.

POSTED BY OCP AT 07/14/06 2:40 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password










TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS

Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group