Sign up for Friends With Benefits
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:16 AM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Wet, hard, and dreaming

pages: 1 | 2
9/22/2006 3:12:09 PM

Moore and Gebbie are including material with the idea of alarming their readers, and they want us to question our alarm. In the orgy scene, as M. Rougeur reads aloud from his White Book a tale of an incestuous family, a participant expresses discomfort. M. Rougeur answers that what he is reading are fictions and that “only madmen and magistrates cannot discriminate between them.” And the point is reiterated when Dorothy and Wendy find themselves increasingly excited as Alice tells them tales of sexual degradation.

The point being made, of course, is that we should be free in our fantasies and that thoughts are not deeds. The problem with Lost Girls is that, as it spreads the gospel of pleasure, preaching exists side by side here with the priapic. And the message of the sermon goes only so far.

The argument Moore and Gebbie are making, that porn deals in fantasy, not reality, is mucked up by the very thing whose existence isn’t acknowledged in Lost Girls: photographic porn. This is not to enter into the deranged territory of Catherine Mackinnon and the late Andrea Dworkin and claim that pornography is rape. Even transgressive fantasies in adult movies and photo layouts are done with the consent of the participants. But photographed porn exists in a weird netherworld between fantasy and documentary, and some of its uglier aspects (and now, widespread and catering to every desire, porn has gotten uglier) don’t have the comforting distance the same acts would in a story or a drawing. And it’s easier to make the argument being made here because, at $75 a pop, Lost Girls will have a limited audience.

The broader failure of the authors’ argument is that it falls back on the line beloved of censorship opponents: “Art can’t hurt you.” To which the only real response anyone who cares about the arts can make is, “What good is it then?” We do free speech no good when we attempt to paint it as an entirely benign thing. There’s no telling what sparks books, movies, paintings, photos, music will set off when they go out into the world. That is not and should not be a rationale for censorship. But protecting free expression shouldn’t be a rationale for defusing it.

Lost Girls | By Allan Moore and Melinda Gebbie | Top Shelf Productions | THREE volumes, $75


ADVERTISEMENT




pages: 1 | 2
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




Suppose you actually met Dorothy from Wizard of Oz or Wendy from Peter Pan and they at down to tell you the strange sordid tales of their lives before and after the worlds fpound in the books that made them famous. Then suppose they invited you up for a spot of tea and some sexual adventures. Sound strange? No more than this tome of sexually explicit tales that the most famous characters in childhood literature recount to one another over tea and crumpets. Well, not really cumpets, but it sure sounds British, doesn't it. Buy this only if you have a deeper understanding of sexual literature and the dark world of Alan Moore, one of the greatest authors in the history of the comic book. This i not a book for children, but it's also not an illustrated Ribald Tale that used to pop up in Playboy. It delves deeply into the psychology of sex and hints that our favorite characters from Peter Pan etc. were actually quite mad. Moore tries his best to acknowledge Freud's tenet that all of human emotions are derived from the depths of our sexual core and that such dreams and thoughts reflect the very basis of all human behavior. This is not for children or even young adults as the illustrations, which are very graphic, can obscure the very witty and intelligent dialogue when viewed by the immature mind. It is the storyline that makes this effort so attractive and at the same time repulsive to the reader but it is at the very worst stimulating reading and at the very best..well.. stimulating reading.

POSTED BY w00t AT 09/21/06 10:08 AM

ALAN moore. it is ALAN moore, mr. taylor. not ALLAN moore. it's not like nobody's ever heard of him. you ought to be more careful. and doesn't the phoenix have copy editors? sheesh. interesting take on the book, howev.

POSTED BY hipspinster AT 09/22/06 10:22 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group