LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

Sex, Iraq, and pop culture

January 11, 2007 10:32:38 AM

pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Where are our rebels? And, Donnelly asks, where is our SDS? Are we another “lost generation” — lost peeking under Britney’s very short skirt?

Perhaps we can’t wait for the world to change, John Mayer — what kind of defeatist attitude is that anyway? (Obviously, he’s never played Sonic the Hedgehog 2.)

Instead, we need people Mayer’s age — my age — to ask: who are we fighting in Iraq? What are we fighting? Why are we fighting? And for how long?

In December, President Bush met with the Iraq Study Group to discuss the panel’s report on the war. Co-chair James Baker admitted the final report does not contain all the answers.

Still, people keep telling me they know about the war. And people keep telling me they know a lot about the Middle East.

But what do they know?

When a reporter from Congressional Quarterly asked Representative Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex), returning Democratic chair of the House Intelligence Committee, about Hezbollah, Quarterly quoted Reyes as saying, “Hezbollah. Uh, Hezbollah. Why do you ask me these questions at 5 o’clock?” And no, Reyes did not know the difference between Sunni and Shiite either.

But what do I know?

The history of Islam is 14 centuries deep. The number of insurgent groups fighting in Iraq is at least four — the Baathists, the Islamists, the Sunni, the pan-Arab Nationalists. The population of Iraq, a country slightly twice the size of Idaho, is, according to the CIA World Factbook, more than 26 million. There are more than 140,000 US troops currently deployed in Iraq; and, to quote Buzzel, “You know what? . . . If I die over there, no one would give a fuck.”

But what does he know?

In his book The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, Princeton’s Bernard Lewis, a Near Eastern–studies professor emeritus, writes that America’s general level of knowledge in the subject of history is “abysmally low.” (Does Lewis know that our general knowledge of “Brangelina” is galactically high?)

Here, I offer a humble list of resources on the Iraq War. Lewis’s book is on the list. But not every source is written by a professor emeritus; I paid my dues to pop culture and threw in an anonymous graffiti “art terrorist,” as well as a female Iraqi blogger. Read over the list. Suggest more in the comments section if you know about them. Like I said, “What do I think about the war in Iraq?” I think, “What do I know, anyhow?”

The art
Banksy — There is an elephant in the room, and curiously, she is painted red and gold to match the chintzy wallpaper. (Now, she’s eating hay and wagging her tail in 30-second clips on YouTube.) The elephant was part of self-proclaimed “art terrorist” Banksy’s three-day vandalized-warehouse exhibition in Los Angeles. The Brit graffiti artist has also vandalized the Met and MoMA, where his art remained in the museums’ collections for two hours, and for six days, respectively.

In addition to the elephant, Bansky has stenciled little boys with pails and shovels digging palm-tree-and-blue-sky scapes on the Israeli West Bank barrier at the Bethlehem and Ramallah checkpoints — a location Bansky describes as the “world’s largest open-air prison and the ultimate activity-holiday destination for graffiti artists.” His viewpoint on the war: “People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. And people in glass cities shouldn’t fire missiles.” Banksy’s person remains anonymous. His book War and Piece does not.

G.B. Trudeau — Well, there’s Peace Out, Dawg!, Got War?, The War Years (Anthology), The Long Road Home: One Step at a Time, The War Within: One More Step at a Time, and Heckuva Job, Bushie! Something of a cartoon fix.

In his strips, Trudeau follows former Vietnam vet B.D., who volunteered for Vietnam to get out of writing a term paper and lost his leg in the war in Iraq. And, after 35 five years, the cartoon character has also lost his helmet. Rolling Stone ran the picture of B.D. sans helmet on its cover. From political cartoon cover-stories to I’m From Rolling Stone?

Steve Mumford — Mumford is an American who traveled to Iraq, as well as the author of Baghdad Journal: An Artist in Occupied Iraq. The New York–based artist’s drawings and paintings render war’s ordinary side; my particular favorite is Miller Lite Catfight Girls posing with US troops. (Joe Millionaire flew in with the girls on Blackhawks.) Mumford also keeps a journal. Most passages are similar to this one about the Catfight Girls:

“They weren’t all that hot, man. The blonde, she had thick ankles,” says Martinez.

“You fucking crazy, man? You haven’t seen a civilian girl in six months and you’re criticizing her ankles?!” says Jimenez.

“I’m telling you, man, I’m picky. Now, my wife’s got nice ankles.”

Mumford’s work can also be found online at artnet.com.

Brian K. Vaughan and Niko Henrichon — Some talking lions escaped from the Baghdad Zoo and they’re ready to kick some serious ass — or is it worth it? — in Vaughan and Henrichon’s graphic novel, Pride of Baghdad. Check out Douglas Wolk’s review here.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
COMMENTS

In the 70's the draft engaged a generation. A volunteer force has left this generation with the option to "Ignore the War". Maybe that will be your mantra.

POSTED BY muggsy AT 01/11/07 11:00 AM
PEACE is my mantra...found during the Halloween season (for those guised as hippies)I proudly wear a peace sign around my neck.

POSTED BY reneeb AT 01/12/07 9:01 AM
Ms. Dean does a good job illustrating how pop culture, with its insipid focus on celebrity, is more important to most Americans than acting on their citizen responsibility to question our Presidents (Kennedy and Johnson also lied to us) about their motives for going to war. Americans need to quit rationalizing their Iraq ignorance and post 9-11 hate on "bad intelligence": Bush and his cronies lied to us and we bought it. It is again time for Americans to once again understand that ever since WW2, going to war and invading foreign countries is more about war profiteering, pleasing the weapons and aerospace industry, controlling natural resources in "hot spot" countries, and pure power politics. All one needs to look at is how the trial of Saddam Hussein never once addressed the fact that during the time of his atrocities, he was America's our # 1 ally in the Middle East and it was the British who gave him the gas he used on the Kurds. Where was the hanging noose for the Americans and Brits who were complicate in those same war crimes? Iraq is the same lie with a different bad guy (remember Noriega in Panama?). Americans have a choice: continue to be mindlessly obsessed with the marriage of Brad and Angelina or take responsibility for being responsible American citizens. Somehow, I doubt that they will choose the latter.

POSTED BY RockyB AT 01/14/07 1:13 PM
Yes, Ms. Dean adroitly shows that we think more about sex than war, but doesn't that go without saying? Isn't that human nature? You can't simply state that young people think more about sex than war, condemn us, toss some reading material in our direction, and walk away satisfied. I have questions, but I'll start with just one. The first is why. Why do we think about sex more than war? I believe I am (relatively, yet inadequately) well-informed about the war. I believe Iraq has become an international disaster, but truth be told, I am much more concerned about my own sex life and whether or not Jim will stay with Karen or make another bid for Pam. And here's the thing - i don't think I should feel bad about that. I don't think it's inherently wrong to think more about sex than war. I think it's fine, actually. Sex, for the most part, is pleasant. War is not. So I devote 90% of my thoughts to sex, 9.9% to miscellany, and the other .1% to war. But when I'm in that .1%, I try to be concerned, thoughtful, and informed. That's the best I, or most of my peers, can do.

POSTED BY AdamW AT 01/16/07 5:18 PM
This is a very good article-- though not sure of the importance between the connection between war and sex-- except the obvious. Still, I think the larger points are smart and on the money. History will obviously prove unkind to Bush for his presiding role in this debacle-- but it may prove even less kind to the American people, who through sheer apathy have allowed this to happen. We no longer seem to live in a democracy-- most Americans oppose the war. Still, look where we are. It's mostly our fault

POSTED BY WPG AT 01/18/07 11:24 PM
The comparisons that Ms. Dean makes between sex, war, and pop culture, are interesting. I think that the order in which they are listed also makes sense. Sex should be the highest on the list. Make love not war right? If more people concentrated on their sex life maybe they wouldn't have to live vicariously through hollywood stars. They also might develop a focus other then the greed, power lust, and fear that creates the wars that may have a different name, but the same results. Of course if Americans started developing their own creativity and critical thought rather then relying on the laziness of being stimulated by trash journalism and mindless reality shows, we might see some changes as well.

POSTED BY BT76 AT 01/22/07 10:45 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group