Best Music Poll 2006 - Details & Purchase Tickets
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:13 PM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Love and death

pages: 1 | 2

Romeo and Juliet at the ART, Othello at Boston Theatre Works

By: CAROLYN CLAY
2/22/2006 11:01:11 AM

ROMEO AND JULIET Star-cross'd? Try pissed off.Forget star-cross’d. At the American Repertory Theatre, Romeo and Juliet are just plain cross. Pissed off. From start to finish. And so is everyone else in Israeli director Gadi Roll’s muscular and unsentimental staging of Shakespeare’s tragedy of flammable old hate, defiant young love, and despairingly bad timing. This Romeo and Juliet (at the Loeb Drama Center through March 25) is dark, striking, and determinedly aggressive. The audience is seated on two sides of a long, narrow playing space that is filled with sand, surrounded by steel grates, and flanked by metal-mesh doors that suggest “fair Verona” is as much a prison as Hamlet’s Denmark. Both a wrestling pit and a runway come to mind as Montagues and Capulets grovel in dirt and enmity and black-clad, punk-accessorized partygoers, their faces masks and their bodies blades, boogie to a musical mix of Baroque and techno. Roll’s is a deliberately belligerent, narrow reading of the play — one in which hearts and flowers give way to the nihilism of Edward Bond and Sarah Kane (a depressive playwright-poet of the English stage who committed suicide at 28), both of whom are quoted in the program. The staging is not stupid and it’s not namby-pamby, but neither does it tell the whole tale of woe “of Juliet and her Romeo.” And it certainly does not afford the actors a chance to run the gamut of their characters’ emotions.

“Is love a tender thing?” asks Mickey Solis’s Romeo, as if he really sought the answer — which in this production is no. Like everything else, love is a brute outgrowth of an all-encompassing hostility that not only finds Montague and Capulet servants biting their thumbs at one another but has Will LeBow’s old Capulet barking at the County Paris come to woo, Che Ayende’s Mercutio rattling about Queen Mab as if she were a chip on his shoulder, and Annika Boras’s surly punk-princess Juliet — who does not remove her combat boots even to consummate her marriage — spending the entire balcony scene ricocheting between pique and frustration. When even “parting is such sweet sorrow” is as brusque as a handshake, you can forget “How silver-sweet sound lovers’ tongues by night/Like softest music to attending ears!”

There’s just no room in such a tough, anger-driven world for wonder or surrender or the Bard’s exquisite poetry — which must be rushed through as if it stood in the way of fate or the next street fight. Town, teens, and the body politic — as symbolized by John Campion’s limping and stuttering Prince Escalus — have all been sorely damaged by the ancient rancor that has everyone flexing a continuously itchy trigger finger. This may be a justifiable if radical interpretation of the play, in which “violent delights have violent ends.” But it’s pushed to such an extreme that the production, despite sound designer David Remedios’s mix of electric rock, sultry jazz, softly tinkling piano, and church music, seems one-note.

Since this Romeo was originally conceived by director János Szász (who withdrew in hope of directing a movie), in collaboration with a design team that includes Riccardo Hernandez (who had supplied sets for Szász’s strong ART stagings of Marat/Sade, Uncle Vanya, and Desire Under the Elms), it’s remarkable how well Roll’s approach conforms to the harsh, prearranged milieu, with its hints of Italian thuggery, its minimal furnishings, and DM Wood’s somber lighting design, in which vertical and horizontal shafts of light pinpoint action also illuminated at various times by poker lights, lanterns, candelabras, and what look like fireflies. Also contributing to the aggressive tenor of the production are Rod Kinter’s nasty, grunting knife fights and Doug Elkins’s striding, angular line dances.

But the actors, like the poetry, are shortchanged. Only Karen MacDonald manages a nuanced characterization, downplaying the caricatured bawdiness of the Nurse to create a woman both prating and sent reeling like a ragdoll by woe upon woe. Solis’s Romeo is allowed to digress from the general ire and be occasionally morose, but Solis replaced another actor three weeks before opening and hasn’t had the opportunity to dig as deep into the part as previous performances suggest he’s capable. Ayende captures Mercutio’s flamboyance when he addresses “Signor Ro-may-o,” but his performance is mostly declamatory. Thomas Derrah’s Friar Lawrence is commanding but almost fascistic. One presumes Will LeBow’s Capulet is hot under the collar because Elizabeth Hess’s boozy floozy of a Lady C is sleeping with Marc Aden Gray’s taut Tybalt, whose blood she wears like lipstick after his murder. This is a stylish production that a Verona-wide anger-management course might set right.


ADVERTISEMENT




pages: 1 | 2
  Change Text Size




No comments yet. Be the first to start a conversation.

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS

Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group