LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Can Obama lasso the Bay State?

January 23, 2008 3:05:50 PM

pages: 1 | 2 | 3

But most of these same forces lined up for Tom Reilly, who lost. They also backed Deb Goldberg for lieutenant governor in 2006; she, too, lost in the Democratic primary.

And many of these same people rallied behind Niki Tsongas in this past year’s special election for US Congress. Tsongas — like Clinton, blessed with the surname of a beloved Democratic party legend — also dominated the polls, but in the end barely survived a primary challenge.

Recently, as attested by the Patrick win, Massachusetts Democrats have certainly seemed eager to vote for the unknown challenger over the well-known establishment figure. And despite the polls, there is still plenty of time for a local Obama surge.

With New Hampshire in the rear-view mirror, local volunteers are now focusing on Massachusetts, say Obama staff and supporters. Organizational meetings are happening all over Massachusetts, and this past weekend those volunteers were making calls from 36 phone-bank locations across the state.

Things will really pick up after this Saturday, when the Democrats’ last pre–Super Tuesday primary takes place in South Carolina. After that, the power of the grassroots will be unleashed for the 11 days leading to February 5.

Don’t be surprised to see Obama announce at least one visit to the state in that stretch — and don’t underestimate the effect of an Obama in-person rally. You may recall the exuberant crowds on the Boston Common when Obama appeared here in support of Patrick, or the 5000 attendees at Obama’s fundraiser at the Agganis Arena this past April. A high-energy Obama swing through the state could easily change the poll numbers here overnight.

Saint Patrick?
If the backing of the Democratic establishment in Massachusetts is not exactly golden, we don’t really know the strength of Patrick’s Midas touch, either.

“Deval Patrick’s got almost this mythic grassroots organization,” says one Clinton insider. “But we proved in New Hampshire that we can out-organize them.”

Certainly, Clinton’s win in New Hampshire gave observers reason to question the value of Patrick’s endorsement — and of the hundreds of Obama volunteers who streamed up from Massachusetts.

In fact, some, including WBZ’s Jon Keller, have suggested that Obama’s similarity to Patrick may have done him more harm than good among New Hampshirites, who are well aware of the lack of quick progress that the Massachusetts governor has made.

This could be even more of a problem in Massachusetts. Frankly, a lot of Massachusetts Democrats now wonder whether they were snookered into believing that an unknown and inexperienced candidate, however inspirational his rhetoric, could really change the entrenched Beacon Hill bureaucracy, let alone Capitol Hill’s.

Obama’s supporters, naturally, dispute the notion that Democrats are worrisomely down on Patrick, and argue that, regardless, people are still looking for the same kind of change. “Deval Patrick was the instrument of that in 2006,” Solomont says, “and Barack Obama is the instrument of that in 2008.”

Clinton campaign staff won’t say that they’ll use disappointment in Patrick as an argument against Obama — not exactly, anyway. They do point out that Clinton’s central campaign theme is the importance of experience — that “we know that she’s ready from day one.”

If people in Massachusetts take that to mean that Obama will go through a Patrick-like learning curve, with far more at stake in a world of peril, well, the Clinton folks won’t argue otherwise.

Late start
Perhaps that’s why, so far, Patrick has been touting Obama much more in faraway places — Iowa, South Carolina — than in Boston and Worcester. Or perhaps it’s just the natural presidential-campaign obsession with the earliest voting states.

Either way, it’s hard to avoid feeling as though the schedule thus far seems more likely to boost Patrick’s fortunes in national politics than Obama’s.

There is little doubt that Obama’s Massachusetts campaign is late getting its act together, says Michael Dukakis, former governor and presidential nominee, particularly considering the importance Patrick placed on early organization during his successful campaign.

In the earliest days of Patrick’s crusade, Dukakis points out, anyone who came to a speech or event got signed up as a precinct captain. That’s only just now starting to take place for Obama. “It’s happening now, but it’s three weeks to go,” says Dukakis, who is currently spending a semester teaching at UCLA. “This should have happened in the spring and early summer [of 2007].”

The Obama campaign opened its first Massachusetts office — in Somerville’s Davis Square — this past fall, but it has been used almost exclusively for making calls and arranging door-knocking trips up to New Hampshire. “Those kids from Boston should have been signed up months ago to work the precincts in Massachusetts,” says Dukakis.

Obama hasn’t even gotten wide support — at least, so far — among Massachusetts’s progressive bloggers. Only one of the three Blue Mass Group editors has endorsed him, and several other sites have leaned toward Edwards or Clinton.

Most glaring, at least to this point, is the absence in Obama’s Massachusetts organization of top Patrick personnel, who worked the state for his race. Obama’s Massachusetts director was brought in from out of state. So was his state communications director.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
COMMENTS

We will choose 61 delegates at congressional district caucuses on April 5 not 32: M assachusetts 2008 Delegate Selection Plan Page 7 SECTION III SELECTION OF DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES A. DISTRICT-LEVEL DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES 1. Massachusetts is allocated 61 district-level delegates and 10 district-level alternates.

POSTED BY Hilltowner AT 01/24/08 11:05 AM
I suspect that David Bernstein, like most 21st century journalists (I use the term very loosely), will consisder it naive to observe that the word "Edwards" was used only once in the entire article. You'd think that those who think would have been impressed by the stark contrast between Edwards and his opponents in the MLK Day debate. Both in terms of style and substance we saw the difference of a Presisdential Edwards and two adolescents, behaving as though they were appearing on Jerry Springer. The press has annointed the two Democrats least likely to beat McCain. Someone did a study of press coverage last week and reported that Edwards received 7% of the coverage. How that was calculated wasn't explained, but does anyone doubt that the press has been tilting the playing field week after week? If Democrats want to win the Whitehouse, they need to nominate Edwards or beg Al Gore at the Convention, because the two Democratic candidates the press has already nominated probably can't pull it off.

POSTED BY Phil Dunkelbarger AT 01/24/08 2:49 PM
According to your writer: "Clinton campaign staff won’t say that they’ll use disappointment in Patrick as an argument against Obama — not exactly, anyway. They do point out that Clinton’s central campaign theme is the importance of experience — that “we know that she’s ready from day one.” I think Clinton has proven that she & Bill will imply, say or do anything to win, even if it devastates, divides and destroys Democrats' chances in November. A sad state of affairs where, once again, the voters lose. The only reason she would be ready from "day one" is because voters aren't electing her, we're re-electing "Team Clinton." That's why she relies on Bill's record regarding the economy; she certainly doesn't have one. What she will accomplish is to bring out the Republican vote in the Heartland -- Rush Limbaugh listeners are chomping at the bit to vote against her. Unlike the real potential that Obama has to unite, she will divide the country both during the election and -- if she actually manages to eke out a polarizing win -- during her 4 years in office. I shudder at the prospect of Bill having to come to her defense as he has done repeatedly in this election. So much for "breaking the glass ceiling."

POSTED BY Joan V. AT 01/25/08 11:52 AM
Here is one more reason to vote for or against Obama. //rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_commentary/commentary_by_robert_d_novak/attorney_general_edwards Attorney General Edwards? An Inside Report by Robert Novak Friday, January 25, 2008

POSTED BY Krogy AT 01/25/08 8:05 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR
  • NO SIDE BETS:   The governor’s gaming legislation crapped out, but are casinos still alive in a compromise? Plus, a school-budget crisis could start a political firestorm.
  • WHITHER THE GOP?:   With Democrats in total control of state government, the Massachusetts GOP should be a rising voice of dissent. Instead, it seems more impotent than ever.
  • MORE THAN A FEW LOOSE ENDS:   BPD to review Cowans evidence
  • OBAMA OUTSIDE THE BOOM:   The first political leader of my generation acts nothing like the rest of us — which might be how he’s gotten where he is
  • IG REPORT ON STATE SENATE PREZ TAKES A CONVENIENT DIVE:   Fails to deal with tourism controversy
  • FRAMED?:   The Boston Police investigation of Stephan Cowans led to a wrongful conviction. Was it incompetent — or corrupt?
  • CASH CAROUSEL:   Many things changed this year on Beacon Hill, but not the power of the almighty dollar
  • EXCLUSIVE: CALIFORNIA GLEAMING:   Romney gains on McCain in crucial Golden State contest; Clinton's lead holds steady
  • MADAM MAYOR MAUREEN?:   While everyone was distracted by the New Hampshire primary, did City Council President Maureen Feeney step into the race for mayor?

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group