Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence  |  Stuff at Night
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page

That’s what he said

Barack Obama sounds just like Deval Patrick. Is that good or bad?
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 17, 2008


“Girl” power
YouTube’s ObamaGirl video has been watched some 5.2 million times. Obama’s acclaimed Jefferson-Jackson Day speech in Iowa? A scant 230,000-plus. Proof, perhaps, that words — however eloquent — can’t trump a little T&A, at least on the Web.
More than any other presidential candidate, Barack Obama owes his success to sheer rhetorical power. Obama’s dazzling keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention made the then–Illinois state senator an instant presidential prospect. His breakthrough speech at Iowa’s Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in November 2007 led to his caucus win earlier this month. Even conservatives dig his shtick: Republican media operative Mark McKinnon praised him as a “walking, talking hope machine.”

Here in Massachusetts, though, Obama’s oratory can also trigger déjà vu. His compelling message sounds a lot like the one that Deval Patrick — who’s known Obama for years, and who, like Obama, is a client of Democratic media consultant David Axelrod — used during his successful 2006 gubernatorial campaign. (Axelrod also worked for Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards in 2004, the same year he helped Obama win election to the US Senate.) As David Kravitz, an editor of the liberal blog Blue Mass. Group, wrote after Iowa: “[T]here was always lots of similarity, but it’s getting really dramatic.”

This Patrick-Obama parallelism hasn’t gone unnoticed in the press. In April 2007, after a New York Times Magazine profile of Axelrod mentioned it in passing, the Boston Globe examined it in greater depth two weeks later. And this past weekend — after the Globe noted the two politicians’ fondness for the phrase “Yes we can!” in a story on Patrick’s decision to stump for Obama in South Carolina — the Associated Press ran a bigger piece on the subject.

Overall, though, these stories have had an exculpatory gist. While the articles note that Patrick and Obama share broad themes — hope, change, a faith in the power of words and the political grassroots — they seem willing to attribute this commonality to shared life experiences (both are African-Americans who rose from humble circumstances to attend Harvard Law School) and shared political instincts and beliefs. As Axelrod told the AP: “It’s not surprising that there would be a commonality of themes. They’ve been friends for so long. They talk a lot. . . . I’m sure they learned from each other.”

Two of a kind
But did they overdo it? Remember: this is a presidential election in which authenticity (or the perception of authenticity) is playing a major role. Hillary Clinton’s emotional moment pushed her to victory in New Hampshire, for example, while Mitt Romney's Manchurian Candidate persona is crippling his campaign.

To date, this dynamic has helped Obama. As Huffington Post blogger Steve Rosenbaum wrote this past year: “Simply put — Obama’s words feel like his own. Both convincing and colloquial. . . . His delivery is authentic.”

Of course, no politician creates his or her message out of whole cloth. But the parallels between Patrick and Obama’s messages are so close that they could end up limiting Obama’s ability to play the authenticity card. Consider the following:

Both men depict themselves as change agents confronting stale establishments.

• Patrick, speaking to National Public Radio (NPR) in December 2005: “The state is slipping behind, and I’m persuaded that the same old thing from the same insiders is not going to help.”

• Obama in a January 9 speech in Jersey City: “[D]o you want the same old folks out there doing the same old things? We need someone new.”

Both say they’re leading movements — and minimize the hubris of this claim by crediting their supporters.

• Patrick in his November 7, 2006, victory speech: “You are the ones who transformed this from a political campaign to a movement for change, and I am honored and awed by what you have done.”

• Obama speaking with reporters after his victory in the Iowa caucuses: “I think [Iowa voters] sparked a potential movement for change in the country that will be inspiring for a lot of people.”

Both practice an existential brand of politics.

• Patrick in an October 2006 speech on Boston Common, where he hammered Republican candidate Kerry Healey for a controversial ad linking Patrick to a convicted rapist: “Hers is a politics of fear. Ours is a politics of hope.”

• Obama in April 2007, responding to Republican Rudy Giuliani’s suggestion that America will suffer another big terrorist attack if a Democrat wins in 2008: “Rudy Giuliani today has taken the politics of fear to a new low, and I believe Americans are ready to reject those kind of politics.”

Both leaven their optimistic tone by emphasizing the need for hard work.

• Patrick in a 2006 TV spot: “[M]y grandmother had a saying, ‘Hope for the best and work for it.’ That fundamentally is what I’m asking you to do now.”

• Obama in his official campaign kickoff speech in February 2007: “[I]t won’t be easy . . . Let us begin this hard work together. Let us transform this nation.”

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama , Barack Obama , Deval Patrick ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
That’s what he said
Obama was the editor of the Harvard Law Review, which means that he was the top student at the top law school in the world. So there should not be any question that he is for real.
By gordon on 01/20/2008 at 1:35:16

election special
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   RACIAL HEALING  |  November 10, 2008
    Former mayoral opponents Ray Flynn and Mel King discuss how far their city’s come, and how far it hasn’t, since 1983
  •   NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD  |  November 03, 2008
    What if the election doesn’t end on Election Day?
  •   BULL DISCLOSURE  |  October 22, 2008
    As the candidates prep for the final debate, it’s a fitting time to ask: why do some journalistic conflicts of interest become scandals, while others get almost no attention at all?
  •   ROLLED  |  October 02, 2008
    Where’s the outrage over media mistreatment at the RNC?
  •   TWITHEADS  |  September 25, 2008
    Is it time to dial down journalism’s latest fad?

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Features:
Monday, November 10, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group