The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics

Long national nightmare

What if all the pundits, pollsters, and press are (gasp!) wrong about Obama’s chances?
By STEVEN STARK  |  October 29, 2008


Last night, I woke up in a sweat. I’d had a very bizarre dream . . .

NOVEMBER 5 — There was Wilson over Hughes. And, of course, Truman over Dewey. But there’s never been a surprise in presidential politics like the one that awaited Americans this morning, who woke up to discover that, somehow, John McCain had been elected president over Barack Obama.

Not a single poll, tracking or otherwise, had McCain ahead. The articles had all been written: Michael Scherer of Time, “McCain’s Struggles: Four Ways He Went Wrong”; Jonathan Alter of Newsweek, “We’re Heading Left Once Again”; and Joan Vennochi of the Boston Globe, “That’s It for McCain.” To be fair to them, it was hard to find a single major pundit anywhere who predicted McCain would win — though the astute Michael Barone, author of The Almanac of American Politics, did pen a column 17 days before the vote warning that a surprise was possible. Given Barone’s credentials, someone should have listened.

Of course, Wednesday-morning quarterbacking is ridiculously easy, but in retrospect, what happened should have been crystal clear: Obama’s lead was never as great as the media hype that accompanied it — he only led by two to six points in some major tracking polls. In several of them, Obama tellingly never cleared 50 percent. (There was a larger-than-usual undecided vote.) And whether it was the so-called “Bradley effect” (suggesting a racial element to the vote) or something else, Obama performed last night exactly as he often had in the spring against Hillary Clinton: he ran below expectations.

Meanwhile, the tsunami of youth support for Obama never materialized. Instead, it was the over-65 crowd who turned out as if the election were a five-o’clock dinner special, and who voted in record numbers for their fellow senior citizen.

“It was fear of the known versus fear of the unknown — and fear won out,” quipped one McCain aide.

In the campaign’s final days, as the financial crisis that had boosted Obama in mid September seemed to fade somewhat, McCain found his voice, constantly challenging Obama on taxes. In contrast, Obama essentially took victory laps, promising to “change the world” and drawing huge crowds. He outspent his rival exponentially; even General Colin Powell endorsed him. Meanwhile, his supporters freely gave self-congratulatory interviews to a willing media. The press reported his transition team was already meeting. Cabinet lists were drawn up. Newsweek wondered how “President Obama” would govern. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and other Capitol Hill leaders announced their ambitious plans for the first 100 days; Jesse Jackson promised that the country’s policies toward Israel would soon change.

It was the “Feiler Faster Thesis,” popularized by Slate blogger Mickey Kaus (and credited to author Bruce Feiler, who wrote Walking the Bible), in action. In an era of short memories and even shorter attention spans, it almost appeared as if Obama was already the incumbent. So, in a time of unrest, voters kicked that incumbent out — after all of a month.

The ugly surprise
At first, it wasn’t evident that something extraordinary was brewing last evening. The polls in Virginia closed at 7 pm Eastern time, and that race was too close to call (no surprise there) since, even though Obama was favored in the Old Dominion State, George W. Bush had carried it by eight points both elections.

But by 8 pm, it began to become apparent that the blowout some in the media and the Obama camp had been predicting might not be materializing. New Hampshire — where pre-election polls had seen Obama up 10 points — was too close to call, a repeat of what had happened almost a year before in the primary between Obama and Clinton. Missouri and Ohio were also too close to call, with McCain showing unexpected strength among working-class and Catholic voters. Just as in 2004, Florida was showing unexpected strength for the Republicans, despite the housing crisis. Then Minnesota began to report and, in a huge surprise, that race, too, was too close to call.

Eventually, McCain won New Hampshire, Florida, Missouri, and Ohio. And he sealed his narrow victory in the Electoral College by winning out west in Colorado — and Nevada for good measure.

“Colorado was the key,” said one GOP official early this morning. “It wasn’t pretty, but we always thought we could surprise there. Bush won it by almost five points last time. And an anti–affirmative action proposition on the ballot brought out our voters.”

Obama conceded around noon today, promising that, though the revolution he promised had been temporarily derailed, “we are the future.” Right now, however, the immediate future belongs to John McCain.

Whoa, that was scary! Note to self: never listen to Limbaugh before bed time . . .  

To read the “Presidential Tote Board” blog, go to Steven Stark can be reached at

ODDS: same as last week

Related: Odium at the podium, Maverick in a mess, Two many Americas, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Barack Obama, Colin Powell, Elections and Voting,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Re: Long national nightmare
McCain needs one more state in your scenario -- did you intend to give him Virginia or Minnesota as well?  Otherwise, the states you name only get McCain to 265 electoral votes.
By Bob L. Head on 10/23/2008 at 10:36:41
Re: Long national nightmare
if things roll that way, the onus of maintaining a republic falls upon a somewhat dysfunctional house and senate. the experiment rolls on.
By jeffmcnary on 10/23/2008 at 12:38:15
Re: Long national nightmare
Hmm - too bad I wrote this article six weeks ago and mine has been accurate.  See, mine was based on reality.  Come on man - predict a McCain victory, but do it with some portion of reality.  Making wild predicition is great and can gin up the base.  But, to not look stupid in the future - you need to be realistic: check out my article: I've been pretty accurate? Why? I based my story on reality.
By theliberalcrab on 10/24/2008 at 9:36:01

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    The financial crisis is a man-made problem. And it might not have occurred if we had listened to women.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    Will Specter the Defector trigger a Democratic domination, or is his jump the sign of a growing moderate revolution?
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    At the 100-day mark, Barack Obama still doesn't have a clear mandate for sweeping reforms
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    The gay-rights movement took a chance on fighting for the right to wed. It's finally paying off.
  •   MAN BITES NEWSPAPER  |  April 19, 2009
    The genesis of the newspaper problems can be traced to Richard Nixon.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group