The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
ted-kennedy-memorial-1000

Where is the hate?

The slow death of Kennedy loathing
By ADAM REILLY  |  August 27, 2008

REPUBLICAN ENEMY NO. 1?: Kennedy has lost his crown as the man they love to hate.Once upon a time, no one whipped up conservative rage like Ted Kennedy. Back in the day, the senator from Massachusetts wasn’t just a misguided Democrat — he was the Liberal Great Satan, a genuine menace to all things good and holy.

Consider Teddy Bare: The Last of the Kennedy Clan, a 1971 screed by Zad Rust dedicated to the accident that killed Mary Jo Kopechne two years earlier. The circumstances of the case were ugly: after driving his car off a bridge and into the waters of Poucha Pond, Kennedy swam to safety and fled, instead of immediately notifying the police. By the time the car was dragged to the surface the following morning, Kopechne was dead.

For author Rust, a fervent anticommunist with a conspiratorial streak, Chappaquiddick epitomized the gulf between Kennedy myth and Kennedy reality. As such, it offered a final chance to open America’s eyes. Like his brothers before him, Ted Kennedy, Rust warned, is “one of the prominent operators chosen by the Hidden Forces that are hurling the countries of Western Civilization toward the Animal Farm world willed by Lenin and his successors.” If Ted Kennedy were elected president, he concluded, a “satanic utopia” would result.

Heavy.

Today, however, the Clintons have replaced the Kennedys as the primary objects of conservative rage. Not only do Bill and Hillary embody the same alleged vices (ruthless ambition, shocking immorality), but they’re also far more powerful. Ted Kennedy may still be the “Liberal Lion of the Senate,” capable of stirring the Democratic faithful at key moments. But after serving in the US Senate since 1962, he’s also an old man (74, to be precise). He’ll never be president. And after dispatching a series of strong Republican challengers, it’s clear he’ll never lose his Senate seat.

Kennedy hatred, in turn, has become a political relic. Last week, at a shindig for young Boston-area Republicans, I asked Jay Cinq-Mars — a Northeastern student managing college outreach for would-be Kennedy challenger Kevin Scott — about his boss’s possible opponent. In response, Cinq-Mars actually offered praise for the man Republicans used to love to loathe. “I’m not going to lie — he’s still got it,” Cinq-Mars said. “He’s been in there forty years, but when he’s prepared, from what I’ve seen, he’s very charismatic. His arguments are very flawed, when you think about them, but when you hear him speak, he presents them very well. He’s very captivating.” Talk about a generation gap.

Kennedy as GOP kingmaker
Just after Chappaquiddick, it would have been foolish to bet on Kennedy’s long-term political future. He ran unopposed in the 1970 Democratic primary, but more than a quarter of Democrats opted not to vote for him. In the 1970 final, meanwhile, Republican Josiah Spaulding pulled in 37 percent of the vote. Considering the Kennedy clan’s status as de facto Massachusetts royalty, these numbers suggested that Teddy was damaged goods.

But he wasn’t — at least not fatally. In the coming decades, no Republican challenger ever came close to knocking off Kennedy. Still, he did attract a string of credible, aggressive Republican challengers. Each generated passion among the conservative faithful, and each went on to become an icon among Massachusetts Republicans.

In 1982, Ray Shamie ran a solid race, pulling in 38 percent of the vote to Kennedy’s 61. After making one more unsuccessful Senate run — he lost to John Kerry, 55 percent to 45 percent, in 1984 — Shamie took the reins of the Massachusetts GOP, where he helped orchestrate Bill Weld’s 1990 gubernatorial victory. Six years later, Kennedy beat back Joe Malone, winning two-thirds of the vote. Malone later parlayed this high-profile defeat into a successful run for state treasurer; today, though out of office, he remains one of the state GOP’s major figures.

CHEESY: Kevin Scott says that Kennedy is "way out in left field" - not exactly the vitriol we're used to from Kennedy's opponents.Then came the 1994 election cycle, which saw Republicans run their strongest Kennedy opponent yet. Mitt Romney lost, just like his predecessors. But by pulling Kennedy below the 60 percent mark — and cracking 40 percent himself — Romney gave the GOP a legitimate moral victory. He also boosted his own career prospects: eight years later, he was elected governor of Massachusetts.

The pattern was clear: by taking on Kennedy, promising young Republicans could make their names statewide and become forces in the Massachusetts GOP. Obviously, this was good for the people in question. But it was also good for the state Republican Party, which had hemorrhaged influence throughout the second half of the 20th century and needed all the young stars it could get.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Tormenting Teddy, Romney’s greatest gaffes — so far, Choosing Kennedy’s successor, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney, Peter Blute, U.S. Supreme Court,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Where is the hate?
Kennedy is a liar and a demogogue. His recent attempts to block a wind farm in his neighborhood prove that he's a fraud and a fake. His only goal is more power for democrats; regardless of the cost to his country. Hatred for him is alive and well here. I wish he were in hell with a broken back.
By rronster on 03/25/2006 at 6:06:40
Where is the hate?
Hatred? No. Bill and Hillary are hated and wear it as a badge of honor, as would any politico who is despised by his hard core opponents. Poor Ted. He is not hated by conservatives; he is ridiculed, which is the worst that could happen to any public figure. He is a farce, a walking caricature of the cartoon stereotype that conservatives wish to portray. Be honest, who did not laugh when Kennedy told Arlen Spector he had not been to the Senate gym in some time? Kennedy is like some drunken uncle who is an embarrassment to his family and is displayed on rare occasions out of respect for the past. A complete joke. Is there any liberal out there who does not cringe when Teddy gets bombastic on TV?
By Dennis Bedard on 03/26/2006 at 6:55:48
Where is the hate?
I still hate him.
By bostonmaggie on 03/26/2006 at 12:41:44

Best Music Poll 2009 winners
BMP_WINNERS_AD
Today's Event Picks
More Information

Great Kennedy haters of history

Kennedy hatred may almost be extinct, but we’ll always have the memories. Some haters of note:

Richard Nixon: Lost 1960 presidential election because JFK looked better on TV.
Fidel Castro: Three words: Bay of Pigs. Plus, Jack and Bobby apparently sanctioned his assassination.
J. Edgar Hoover: Freaky FBI honcho’s influence ebbed after clashes with Bobby.
Jimmy Carter: Sitting president challenged by Teddy in 1980 Democratic primary. WTF?
Martha-Ann Bomgardner: Cried like a baby when Teddy was mean to her husband, then–Supreme Court nominee Sam Alito.
Howie Carr: Populist conservative can’t stand Kennedy clan’s patrician liberalism.

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAVE YOU HEARD THE ONE ABOUT CHAPPAQUIDDICK?  |  September 02, 2009
    Last week, during an appearance on the Washington, DC–based Diane Rehm Show on NPR, Ted Kennedy biographer Edward Klein suggested that if Kennedy could witness his own funeral he'd probably crack a joke.
  •   THE END OF THE AFFAIR?  |  August 27, 2009
    During Mitt Romney's failed bid for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, he demonstrated a potent knack for wooing the conservative commentariat.
  •   DEFAMING TWITTER  |  August 19, 2009
    Hate Twitter? Then you're probably loving a new, buzz-generating study — released last week by the Texas market-research firm Pear Analytics — which found that the vast majority of Twitter messages, a/k/a tweets, are pretty much worthless.
  •   BRAVE NEW ADVERTORIAL  |  August 12, 2009
    This week's reminder that journalism isn't in Kansas anymore comes via a funky advertising concept showcased at  nytimes.com/magazine  — where, as you'd expect, the contents of the New York Times Magazine are available for Web readers.
  •   MR. RESPECTABLE  |  August 12, 2009
    Last Wednesday, oft-vilified media mogul Rupert Murdoch announced that News Corp. — parent company of (among others) the Times of London, the New York Post , and Fox News — will soon begin charging readers for access to all its news sites.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group