The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Toxic talk: Hating Obama

Repugnant anti-Obama hate speech has dissipated for the moment. How likely is it to raise its ugly head again?
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 19, 2009


Speak no evil: Why tightening up on anti-Obama speech is a bad idea. By Adam Reilly.
During and just after the 2008 presidential campaign, the antipathy of right-wing pundits toward Barack Obama reached remarkable, often repugnant depths. Some examples: talk-radio hatemonger Michael Savage warned his listeners that Obama was "hand-picked by some very powerful forces . . . to drag this country into a hell it has not seen since the Civil War." Jay Severin, Savage's Boston-based comrade-in-arms, called on his listeners to "destroy" Obama before he causes "our doom as a nation." (Severin's caveat — that this be done legally — was undercut by his statement that "Obama is King George and we are the Minutemen." The Minutemen weren't big on legality.) And Fox News commentator Liz Trotta quipped, with a chuckle and a smile, that it would be nice to assassinate both Osama bin Laden and Obama. (Trotta later said she was "so sorry" for her comments, and chalked them up to the "very colorful political season.")

Immediately following Obama's victory, meanwhile, similarly vile manifestations of this same mindset popped up around the country. In Maine, a convenience store hosted a betting pool on when Obama would be assassinated, accompanied by a sign that read: "Let's hope someone wins." And a North Carolina State student wrote a disgusting proposal — "Let's shoot that nigger in the head" — inside that school's Free Expression Tunnel.

Where, exactly, did all this anti-Obama venom come from? The fact that Obama's father was black — and that, according to the prevailing conceptualization of race, this makes Obama our first black president — obviously played a role, be it overt or covert. So, too, did the fact that Obama's surname happens to rhyme with "Osama" — and that, according to various bogus conspiracy theories, he's a closet Muslim, and/or a closet Marxist, and/or a buddy of terrorists, and/or a non-citizen whose ascent to the presidency, according to the United States Constitution, is illegal.

Given the manifold wellsprings of dislike and distrust for Obama, it might have been inevitable that things got as ugly as they did. Still, what made this festering animus so dismaying — apart from what it revealed about the deep recesses of our political id — is that it jeopardized Obama's promise as a political unifier. Remember, Obama burst on the scene with his brilliant keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, in which he spoke of transcending the bitter divides of American politics and culture. But two months ago, the president-elect looked, if anything, like the second coming of Bill Clinton — a gifted politician who, as president, could whip Rush Limbaugh and co. into a frenzy and polarize the nation.

In recent weeks, though, there's been a distinct drop-off in repugnant anti-Obama invective — in the conservative press, among the general public, even among white-supremacists. Which raises the question: is extreme Obama-phobia already a thing of the past? Or, instead, is it just on hiatus — and poised to return with a vengeance once Obama actually starts governing?

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Rise of the political bogeyman, Take Back Barack, Party like it's 1999, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama, Michael Savage, Fairness Doctrine,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.
  •   BRAVE NEW GLOBE?  |  January 29, 2010
    Sizing up the Boston Globe 's recent past is easy: simply put, in the past 12 months, the paper has seen enough gut-wrenching drama to change the name of Morrissey Boulevard to Melrose Place. But forecasting the paper's future is another matter.
  •   COVERING A TRAGEDY  |  January 20, 2010
    The earthquake that ravaged Haiti on January 12 posed a major challenge for the Boston Haitian Reporter , the lone English-language outlet focused on Boston's sizable Haitian community. The quake and its aftermath were of vital interest to the Reporter 's core audience, but local, national, and international media were already tackling the story with resources that the Reporter simply didn't have.
  •   THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY  |  January 08, 2010
    Predicting a Super Bowl winner doesn't make you a genius: after all, given a pool of 32 teams, one of them is bound to capture the trophy. But predicting the future for an industry that's been buffeted by new technologies and economic vicissitudes, and sometimes seems to have all the substance and staying power of sea foam? That's an accomplishment.
  •   FOURTH-ESTATE FOLLIES, 2009 EDITION  |  December 28, 2009
    Between the rise of the Web, the ADD-addling of America, the fragmentation of any national political consensus, and the devastated economy, working in the press can feel a bit like manning the Titanic — and this year, the entire industry seemed to teeter on the edge of oblivion.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group