The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Boston's $10 Million Boo-Boos

Righting a wrongful conviction
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  July 7, 2009


The bill continues to come due for the string of nine wrongful convictions discovered in Boston between 1999 and 2004 — a tab that has now topped $10 million in court settlements.

The Boston Phoenix has learned that the city of Boston paid $3.8 million in December to settle a civil lawsuit brought by Anthony Powell, who spent more than 12 years in prison for a rape and kidnapping he did not commit. This is the third, and largest, settlement so far from these cases: the city previously paid $3.2 million each to Neil Miller and Stephan Cowans.

Powell was convicted in 1992 of attacking a woman at knifepoint in Roxbury. He was released in 2004, after DNA testing proved his innocence. The December settlement is in addition to $500,000 awarded to Powell under the state's wrongful-conviction compensation law.

Several other wrongful-conviction suits against the city are still pending, including those of Ulysses Rodriguez Charles, Laurence Adams, and Angel Toro. Shawn Drumgold, perhaps the best-known of the cases, is nearing trial in the second phase of his complicated action against the city and several individual officers. In another case, the city prevailed when a jury ruled that police did not violate the civil rights of Donnell Johnson.

Powell and his attorneys declined to discuss the settlement with the Phoenix, which discovered the settlement amount through a public-information request. The city's corporate counsel, William Sinnott, cited a confidentiality agreement, but said that, "In general terms, we've got a universe of cases we've been dealing with over the past couple of years, and we try to deal with them fairly." He added that the city feels that it has an added obligation in cases like Powell's, where "actual innocence" has been determined through DNA testing.

In court documents and previous interviews, Powell's attorneys have claimed that Boston police officers committed a series of sins in their rush to pin the crime on him: they pressured the victim into identifying Powell, even though he did not match her description; they ignored hairs that they knew did not match Powell's; and they failed to check other evidence.

With the city choosing to settle before trial, the question of whether this was a case of alleged negligence or worse will remain a matter of dispute. As in the other wrongful-conviction cases, the city and the Boston Police Department have not admitted to any wrongdoing. But perhaps the most troubling aspect of Powell's conviction was who didn't get caught.

Even before Powell's conviction, there was reason to suspect that two other attacks — including one that took place after Powell had been jailed — were committed by the same rapist. That could have been confirmed through DNA testing, which was not conducted. After Powell's exoneration, the link between those rapes was confirmed, as was a fourth, committed in 1999.

Last year — just a few months before the city settled Powell's lawsuit — Suffolk County prosecutors charged one Jerry Dixon with the rapes, based on a DNA match. The pursuit of Powell, despite evidence of his innocence, may have prevented police from getting Dixon off the streets earlier, some local observers contend.

Stephen Hrones, the attorney who helped free Powell, adds that the case holds another lesson: the need for a state law governing post-conviction DNA testing .

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Patriots daze, Right-wing terror, Robojudge, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Criminal Trials, Trials, Boston Police Department,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM  |  January 27, 2010
    Platoons of state Republicans, energized by Scott Brown's stunning victory over Democrat Martha Coakley last week, are setting their sights on November.
  •   DISASTER, THEN DÉTENTE  |  January 25, 2010
    From the first days after the earthquake struck Haiti — long before anyone knew how dire the situation was, let alone how the US government would respond — pundits were wagging their tongues about the potential political implications. A poor response, they said, would invite comparisons to the Bush administration's bungled handling of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
  •   HOW BROWN WON  |  January 22, 2010
    As the Massachusetts US Senate election unfolded yesterday, all that the pols and pundits wanted to talk about was how Martha Coakley managed to lose the race. And there is plenty there to dissect. But there is another part of the story, and that is how Scott Brown managed to win it.
  •   READY TO RUMBLE  |  January 13, 2010
    Last summer, the upcoming race that got most Bay State politicos salivating was the run for governor.
  •   CHAOS THEORY  |  January 08, 2010
    In less than two weeks, when Massachusetts voters elect Martha Coakley to the US Senate — let's not pretend that Republican state senator Scott Brown has any chance of pulling off the monumental upset — they will trigger a massive domino effect that has the state's political class buzzing with anticipation.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group