The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
Nominate-best-2010

Ted Kennedy's passing

Also, will Afghanistan be Obama’s Vietnam?
By EDITORIAL  |  August 26, 2009

0908_kennedy_main

Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who served Massachusetts for 46 years — sometimes surrounded by controversy, but always with distinction — was the only one of Joseph P. Kennedy’s four sons to die surrounded by family at home in his bed.

Old man Kennedy, although native-born and well-educated (at Boston Latin and Harvard), embodied a flinty immigrant ideal: “To hell with the world — me and my family first.” The boys were certainly their father’s sons, but they transcended his narrow obsessions. Joe died in combat in the skies over Europe during World War II; Jack, assassinated in Dallas; Bobby, gunned down in Los Angeles.

Service was the ideal of Joe’s children. And not just for the boys, as the life of Eunice Shriver, the founder of the Special Olympics (and also recently deceased), testifies.

Ted Kennedy led a life of Shakespearean intensity. Although punctuated by tragedy, it was by no means tragic. Quite the contrary. In his final years, Kennedy was heroic, his sprightly nature and generous soul fortified by a commitment to social justice that impressed — even awed — all but the most fanatical ideological foes.

That Kennedy’s lifelong crusade for more equitable national health care appeared, at the time of his death, to be once again heading for ruin in Washington bears out the truth of Jack’s often repeated observation: “Life is unfair.”

Kennedy embraced the uncertainties and challenges of life with existential zeal. While his legislative accomplishments were legion, his spirit was unique.

0908_edit2-main

Afghanistan
Here is a scary thought: this time next year, just months before the midterm national elections that will reapportion congressional power between Democrats and Republicans, large numbers of voters will say that, when it comes to the mess in Afghanistan, they’re not sure which president to blame: George W. Bush or Barack Obama.

Pro-Obama commentators on the cable news channels are becoming skittish about the news out of Afghanistan. The warning they are sounding is by way of analogy to Lyndon B. Johnson, who saw his reputation as a domestic reformer destroyed by his escalation of the Vietnam War.

With health-care reform stalled and much spade work still needed to dig the nation out of its disastrous economic downturn, it is very much an open question how many of Obama’s aspirations can be realized.
As for his goal to deliver some sort of victory in Afghanistan — no matter how loosely defined — that, too, seems problematic.

A recent Washington Post–ABC News poll shows that a majority of Americans believe the Afghanistan war is not worth fighting. Thirty-six percent of those respondents think we are losing.

That is not a margin of confidence on which to base further troop escalations. But that, inexplicably, is what American commanders in Afghanistan want to do.

After the surge is fully implemented, the number of soldiers and Marines will stand at 68,000. It is unclear how many more boots on the ground the military brass are now requesting, but they have recently relayed concerns to Richard C. Holbrooke, Obama’s special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The situation in Afghanistan has always been dicey — though before Bush diverted military effort away from that theater to wage his ill-conceived war in Iraq, there were glimmers of hope that Al Qaeda and its Taliban protectors could be marginalized.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Robert McNamara, RIP, Capuano for Senate, Change? What change?, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Barack Obama, Barack Obama, Politics,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TRYING TIMES FOR OBAMA  |  January 27, 2010
    It was only a matter of time before President Barack Obama turned into a deficit hawk. But it is a measure of the desperation sparked by Scott Brown's election to Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat that Obama hatched before the conclusion of the 2010 congressional elections and unveiled a spending freeze.
  •   TEA-BAGGER BROWN TRIUMPHS  |  January 20, 2010
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley may be a good person and a dedicated public servant, but thanks to her gut-wrenching loss to tea-bagging Republican Scott Brown in the race for the US Senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy, Coakley is now — quite rightly — a figure of local scorn and national derision.
  •   COAKLEY FOR SENATE  |  January 19, 2010
    When Massachusetts voters go to the polls on Tuesday to elect a successor to the late Senator Edward Kennedy, they face a choice that is as clear as the difference between black and white.
  •   MENINO'S PROMISE  |  January 06, 2010
    Boston's political tribes checked their traditional hostilities at the door this week when they trooped into Faneuil Hall for the inauguration of Mayor Thomas Menino, who took the oath to serve an unprecedented fifth term.
  •   HOW IS OBAMA DOING?  |  December 16, 2009
    In response to a question from Oprah Winfrey about how he would grade his time in office, President Barack Obama gave himself a "solid B-plus."

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group