The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
Nominate-best-2010

Coakley takes a stand

Plus, free speech at UMass
By EDITORIAL  |  November 18, 2009

0911_edit_main2
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley this week separated herself from the gang of essentially like-minded candidates seeking to fill Senator Ted Kennedy's Washington seat by rejecting the US House of Representatives compromise that traded approval of a health-care-reform bill for greater restrictions to abortion access. Good for Coakley.

Coakley's opposition is not only principled; as more becomes known about the pernicious nature of the House compromise, her position demonstrates foresight. And in political terms, it also appears shrewd. Coakley's chief Democratic rival, US Representative Michael Capuano, now has egg on his face. After blasting Coakley for her congressional naiveté, Capuano conceded that he will vote against a final measure that does not erase the abortion compromise.

Conservatives are trying to scare the pants off Americans by claiming that "Obama Care" — their code name for a government overhaul of health policies and practices — would limit individuals' choices and regulate the kinds of treatment they can or cannot receive.

Is it ironic, then, that a coalition of Republicans and Blue-Dog Democrats would engineer restricted care to women? Not at all.

Irony is too subtle a concept for these snake-oil salesmen. Their stock and trade is deception, employing the big lie, saying one thing and turning around and doing the very thing they decry.

The agency of this deception is the Stupak-Pitts Amendment. It is the work of Democratic representative Bart Stupak of Michigan and Republican representative Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania. Both are anti-abortion die-hards. Stupak, a Catholic, is considered an amiable clod; Pitts, an Evangelical, is presumed to be the team's brains.

The Stupak-Pitts Amendment will force private insurers — who, after all, will receive government funds — to curtail or abandon abortion coverage. It is a radical extension of the Hyde Amendment, which already prevents most federal funds from being used for abortions. But unlike the Hyde Amendment, which shamefully impacts low-income women, the Stupak-Pitts Amendment would extend the reach of anti-choice zealots.

The details of this amendment are disturbing on their own terms. But its triumph — for the time being, at least — testifies to the growing influence of right-wing religiosity within Democratic ranks.

An alliance of fundamentalist Catholics and conservative Evangelicals known as the "co-belligerency" is increasingly active in Washington. When in the capital, Stupak lives in a C Street house that is home to other religious conservatives. The house is owned by "The Family," a secretive organization not unlike Opus Dei, the shadowy Ultramontane Catholic organization that attracts — among others — those with neo-fascist sympathies.

It is testament to how torturous the health-care-reform effort has been that Democrats have been either witless or sufficiently desperate enough to agree to even the prospect of further restriction to abortion access. As many as 40 House members have pledged to reject a final bill that contains the Stupak-Pitts Amendment. And in the Senate, where the health-care effort now moves, there is opposition.

Coakley's rejection of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment highlights what may become a key question for pro-choice Democrats, if or when a final health-reform bill comes to a vote: when does the acceptance half a loaf rather than a whole degenerate into the abandonment of fundamental principles? The line may be fine, but it is real.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: The X factor, Six for the seat, Chaos Theory, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , U.S. Government, Edward M. Kennedy, U.S. Republican Party,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   IMPEACH JOHN ROBERTS  |  February 03, 2010
    It is time for an enterprising and courageous member of the US House of Representatives to file articles of impeachment against the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts. The charge: lying under oath.
  •   TRYING TIMES FOR OBAMA  |  January 27, 2010
    It was only a matter of time before President Barack Obama turned into a deficit hawk. But it is a measure of the desperation sparked by Scott Brown's election to Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat that Obama hatched before the conclusion of the 2010 congressional elections and unveiled a spending freeze.
  •   TEA-BAGGER BROWN TRIUMPHS  |  January 20, 2010
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley may be a good person and a dedicated public servant, but thanks to her gut-wrenching loss to tea-bagging Republican Scott Brown in the race for the US Senate seat held by the late Ted Kennedy, Coakley is now — quite rightly — a figure of local scorn and national derision.
  •   COAKLEY FOR SENATE  |  January 19, 2010
    When Massachusetts voters go to the polls on Tuesday to elect a successor to the late Senator Edward Kennedy, they face a choice that is as clear as the difference between black and white.
  •   MENINO'S PROMISE  |  January 06, 2010
    Boston's political tribes checked their traditional hostilities at the door this week when they trooped into Faneuil Hall for the inauguration of Mayor Thomas Menino, who took the oath to serve an unprecedented fifth term.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group