So do you see the book as science fiction?
Technically it’s science fiction because I’m taking a technology that doesn’t exist and putting it into our world. I’m saddened by genre divisions -- there’s a lot I think literary people can learn from genre. The whole Hollywood high-concept thing I’m getting more and more excited about. I see it as sort of thinking experiments: an author finds this bizarre thing to put into motion that’s going to play out, that’s going to force us to think in knew ways about familiar subjects. And when you find one of those concepts it’s so great. There are so many authors that I love that do small domestic books. Sometimes I’m very saddened by how many women are doing small domestic things and not doing thinking experiments. Women authors: that’s my call to arms. Stop with the small, domestic. Get out there and do things we’re not expected to be doing.

Speaking of gender stuff, did you find it challenging writing from the perspective of a middle aged man?
At first I didn’t have much sympathy for Win. As I got older, I had more sympathy. I grew to love him even with all his foibles. I was very interested in the guy mid-life crisis. Women have our version, but it’s not as much around ego and performance and success. It hits men really hard. The cultural stereotypes are more powerful and screwed up and difficult for people to measure up to. It was something that was kind of a stretch for me, the challenge of being a woman and looking at men. And I imagined a recreational drug, a club-drug, that guys at their 20th reunion would take. I liked thinking about different kinds of recreational drugs for different populations. Like what if a typical gathering of guys, football heroes with thinning hair, what if they had their own drug?

There’s a long tradition of drug literature -- Carlos Castaneda, Tom Wolfe, and you reference Thomas De Quincey who wrote Confessions of an Opium Eater. Where do you place your book within the drug lit tradition?
I’m more of a non-fiction writer, and had a habit of including huge swatches of non-fiction in the book. So much got pulled out because it got too nerdy. De Quincey wrote the first drug literature. He came up with the idea of trying to take the experience and transforming it into words. He was basically an advertiser for opium -- after the book came out, opium use went up. It’s a question of how do you simulate a drug experience on the page. It’s this pornography of pharmacology. He was taking a drug that was just seen as medicinal; you wouldn’t have thought that it was harking of new states of consciousness. He really saw something in it and expanded what it means to be conscious. I liked the idea of having a scholar who was wrapped up in those ideas; it was nice to have that as a kernel behind the book. And I thought Win was sort of De Quincey: broke, junkie, miserable, desperate for money. De Quincey sat down and wrote this thing and also managed to really change the culture. I saw Win as someone who could be that person.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
  Topics: Books , Media, Books, Illegal Drugs,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
More Information

More on this story

Memories of you: Pagan Kennedy’s future nostalgia. By Nina MacLaughlin

ARTICLES BY NINA MACLAUGHLIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WITH HIS NEW RESTAURANT ALMOST READY, CHEF WILL GILSON MULLS HERITAGE, HUMILITY, AND HIS YEAR IN CULINARY PURGATORY  |  October 12, 2012
    The door to the kitchen is open, and inside, Will Gilson is getting ready.
  •   ON CARPENTRY AND COLLEGE  |  October 20, 2011
    Age 30, I quit the Phoenix and ended up with a job as an apprentice to a carpenter. Sawing, chiseling, hammering, nail-gunning, tiling, sanding, slotting, framing, hauling, measuring, and sweeping are less obvious outcomes of an undergraduate career in the liberal arts. College, in strange and unexpected ways, prepared me for this sort of work. And in others, did not prepare me at all.
  •   PHDISASTERS  |  April 27, 2011
    I knew a man pursuing a PhD in literature. His dissertation had to do with humor as a form of dissent in 20th-century literature. And how enthused he was at first! How passionate and excited.
  •   DAVID FOSTER WALLACE'S THE PALE KING  |  April 13, 2011
    All I can do is tell you how I read the book.
  •   THE HOUSE THAT HOUSE OF SAND AND FOG BUILT  |  February 25, 2011
    Andre Dubus III collected me at the Newburyport train station last month when the snow piles were already high. We stopped first for a coffee for the road; he asked all the questions: siblings, hometown, are you married?

 See all articles by: NINA MACLAUGHLIN