The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
GG-1000x50

Library woes

Plus, Arizona declares war on immigrants
By EDITORIAL  |  April 28, 2010

1004_bpl_main

In an attempt to save four Boston Public Library branches that are slated to close due to budget shortfalls, some state legislators from Boston have threatened to block all state funding the library receives if it shutters any of its 26 branches. The legislators should back off. This is brinksmanship at its most destructive, short-sighted, and irresponsible.

Regarding the Boston Public Library, there is plenty to be angry about. The trustees — whose authority derives from state law, but who are appointed by the mayor — were negligent to have let this budget crisis develop, or at least to mature in the peculiar way it unfolded. Theirs are sins of omission, not commission. Too often, they’ve seen their constituency as City Hall, not the library-using public.

The underlying economic crisis affecting the nation is a fact. And the strains of municipal finance have been apparent for a long time — to anyone, that is, who has been paying attention.

In terms of funding, however, City Hall has not been actively punishing the library. From a fiscal point of view, the picture is one of benign neglect. That said, Mayor Tom Menino has stage-managed this crisis very effectively, ensuring minimal damage to the system while appearing to lay maximum blame at the trustees’ feet — and all with barely a public statement.

The misguided rebellion by state legislators is at least a healthy reminder that the library enjoys widespread support. If the trustees had spent the same amount of time and energy cultivating Beacon Hill relationships as they have in sucking up to Menino, the Boston Public Library might not be in the straits it is in today.

Arizona: state of shame
Arizona’s odious new immigration law is wrong-headed in so many ways, it’s hard to know where to begin. The law requires officers to ask for documentation from anyone they have reason to suspect of being in the country illegally, and to detain for prosecution anyone who cannot demonstrate otherwise.

In short: if you have brown skin in Arizona, you are assumed illegal, harrassable, and arrestable until you prove you belong here.

The civil-liberties infringement is blatant, as is the inevitability of abuse by law-enforcement personnel. The law also will waste police officers’ time and public resources, and hinder criminal investigations by discouraging cooperation and reporting of crime.

One would imagine that the passage of such a drastic law must have been triggered by a recent increase in the size and scope of problems caused by undocumented aliens in the state — and not by simple anti-Hispanic hysteria.

But reality is just the opposite. Arizona’s undocumented population is in real decline, due mostly to economic circumstances — from 560,000 to 460,000 in 2008 alone, according to government statistics. That’s an 18 percent drop, the largest of any state.

Crime had been decreasing in the state even when the illegal population was growing, and hit new lows last year.

Evidence of any growing harm from undocumented aliens is so hard to come by, its advocates have resorted to manufacturing nonsense. Senator John McCain, for example, declared that illegal immigrants are intentionally causing car accidents.

McCain was once a leading advocate for sensible measures to reform immigration; but now, facing a primary challenge, he kowtows to the nutty conservatives. Ditto for Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, who signed the law in hopes of retaining her seat.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Elephant in the Room, Might as well jump, Poor WGME, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Beacon Hill, U.S. Government, News,  More more >
| More
1 Comments / Add Comment

Crone1

The layoff of 80 front line and operational staff is not "minimal damage". That is 25% of the staff. The library will not recover from that. Look at the FY11 projected budget and you'll find that every one of the targeted positions is still in the budget, so what are they doing with the money?
Posted: April 29 2010 at 10:22 PM
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 12/21 ]   "A Very Merry Lifmus"  @ Church of Boston
[ 12/21 ]   The Buttcracker  @ Midway Café
[ 12/21 ]   Usher + Trey Songz  @ TD Garden
ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   STRONG-ARMING THE FIRST AMENDMENT  |  December 15, 2010
    President Barack Obama is a bright guy. In fact, he's a former constitutional-law professor.
  •   WIKI PARADOXES  |  December 08, 2010
    Trust us: It is only a matter of time before Hollywood brings the saga of WikiLeaks impresario Julian Assange to the big screen.
  •   WHAT DELEO AND MURRAY SHOULD DO  |  December 01, 2010
    WHY LEGISLATIVE LEADERS SHOULD ACT NOW TO MAKE THE PATRONAGE SCANDAL HISTORY
  •   PATRONAGE = CORRPUTION  |  November 23, 2010
    The Massachusetts legislature is shocked — shocked! — that patronage is rife in the Probation Department! Shocked that it exists anywhere in state government! And it looks as if the both the House and the Senate will be damned if they are going to do anything about it.
  •   MISTER ROGERS  |  November 18, 2010
    Malcolm Rogers, top man at Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, has managed to do at his institution what former Harvard president Larry Summers failed to do at his: curb internal self-indulgence and channel creative energy toward serving 21st-century needs.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group