The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In


Health-care reform is a new high-water mark
By EDITORIAL  |  March 24, 2010

The Democrats won and the Republicans lost. That, in a nutshell, is the bottom line. After 15 roiling months of bitter and divisive debate, the nation’s first African-American president, Barack Obama, in harness with the first female Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, made history. It was, as the frequently excitable Vice-President Joseph Biden put it, “a big fucking deal.”

The United States has been struggling for 98 years to enact health-care coverage for all. And while “Obama care” still will not extend to an estimated 15 to 17 million of the nation’s citizens, it is a pretty good start.

Ninety-eight years is a long time. The Republicans, a handful of conservative Democrats, and the tea-bagger crazies have been lying through their teeth in their attempts to convince the American people that health care for all is a dangerous and ill-conceived idea.

Republican turned Bull Moose progressive Theodore Roosevelt first proposed national health care in 1912. In the years that followed, his cousin, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, championed the cause; so did presidents Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton — all to no avail. America may be a deeply conservative — at times even reactionary — country, but sooner or later it gets things right.

Obama’s health-care bill, however, is not an end; it is a beginning. Political life has been forever altered. Republican vows to repeal the measure are hollow threats.

There is little doubt that the Democrats will give up seats in the upcoming mid-term elections. The majority party historically loses leverage two years after winning the White House. But even if the Republicans were to regain control of the House of Representatives (a not unreasonable bet), it is unlikely that they will achieve the 67 votes needed in the Senate to override Obama’s sure-fire veto of any attempt to nullify health-care reform.

What about the lawsuits filed by 14 state attorneys general — 13 Republicans and one Democrat — that seek to have the law declared unconstitutional? The answer is a bit murkier, although most legal experts warn that the Supreme Court is traditionally reluctant to overturn acts of Congress. The fact that no such challenge was even attempted here in Massachusetts, ground zero for health reform, also might speak to such a challenge’s viability.

Further complicating this ploy of unconstitutionality: the provision it seeks to strike down, which levies fines on those who are required to enroll in health care but refuse to do so, does not take effect until 2014.

Would the Supreme Court act in real time to nix something the legislative branch requires in the future? Common sense and precedent would suggest no. But the knuckleheads who constitute the five-justice conservative majority in the court already demonstrated their willingness to defy common sense and congressional intent when they ruled that corporations can make unlimited political-campaign contributions.

Although the fight has not gone out of the Republican snakes, the ground has shifted underneath them.

A day after the health-care bill passed the House, a CNN poll found that a majority opposed it. Twenty-four hours later, a USA Today and Gallup poll reported 49 percent considered it “good” and 40 percent “bad.”

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Interview: Daniel Ellsberg, Reading is fundamentalist, What the health-care bill really means, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, Theodore Roosevelt,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 12/21 ]   "A Very Merry Lifmus"  @ Church of Boston
[ 12/21 ]   The Buttcracker  @ Midway Café
[ 12/21 ]   Usher + Trey Songz  @ TD Garden
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   STRONG-ARMING THE FIRST AMENDMENT  |  December 15, 2010
    President Barack Obama is a bright guy. In fact, he's a former constitutional-law professor.
  •   WIKI PARADOXES  |  December 08, 2010
    Trust us: It is only a matter of time before Hollywood brings the saga of WikiLeaks impresario Julian Assange to the big screen.
  •   WHAT DELEO AND MURRAY SHOULD DO  |  December 01, 2010
  •   PATRONAGE = CORRPUTION  |  November 23, 2010
    The Massachusetts legislature is shocked — shocked! — that patronage is rife in the Probation Department! Shocked that it exists anywhere in state government! And it looks as if the both the House and the Senate will be damned if they are going to do anything about it.
  •   MISTER ROGERS  |  November 18, 2010
    Malcolm Rogers, top man at Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, has managed to do at his institution what former Harvard president Larry Summers failed to do at his: curb internal self-indulgence and channel creative energy toward serving 21st-century needs.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group