Sign up for Friends With Benefits
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:16 AM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Once again, Boston’s police flub for the cameras

When they come for you

By: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
10/4/2006 3:07:45 PM

Filmmakers always seem to catch the Boston Police Department (BPD) on its bad days. Five years ago, the crew of ABC’s Boston 24/7 filmed the city’s top homicide cop busting a guy for murder, who turned out to be innocent. This March, America’s Most Wanted host John Walsh “saddled up” with the vaunted gang unit to hunt down several violent criminals with outstanding warrants, and came back empty-handed.

The latest is Spike TV’s Boston PD, a four-part documentary filmed nearly two years ago but airing now, buried in a late-Friday-night time slot.

The first two of the four episodes aired last week. Spike TV’s cameras followed the gang unit — officially known as the Youth Violence Strike Force (YVSF) — as they rounded up five teens wanted for a gang rape in the Bromley-Heath projects. The YVSF cops are seen enjoying their success after arresting all five; unfortunately, in real life, prosecutors later determined that there was no evidence a crime had been committed, and dropped all the charges — after the five youths had spent more than a year in jail.

Boston PD features more than the YVSF team. It also follows drug-control detective Kevin “Mr. Incredible” Guy; downtown patrol officer Patricia DeRosa, a/k/a football star Pepper Johnson’s girlfriend; and now-retired deputy superintendent Robert O’Toole, who was last seen firing pepper pellets from the hip on Lansdowne Street the night Victoria Snelgrove died. But the show’s look inside the YVSF is especially interesting, in light of a lawsuit currently on the federal docket in which two former members of that unit, Steven Horne and Ronald Brown, allege racial discrimination.


ADVERTISEMENT



The suit refers to conditions through 2001, when Horne and Brown were transferred out, but the Spike TV footage suggests that little has changed.

Among the lawsuit’s claims — backed up by recent affadavits from two other black former YVSF officers — is that white officers were always assigned to patrol with other white officers, and blacks with blacks. In Boston PD, the YVSF’s white officers are seen working together on the warrant-apprehension team; separately we see two black officers, veterans Vance Mills and Greg Brown, riding together on the night patrol.

Viewers also get a peek at how the alleged prejudice affects the way YVSF officers do their jobs. “Mr. Horne and Mr. Brown objected to racism and disparate treatment by white officers, not only as minority officers within the department, but also with regard to the treatment of the minority citizens within the community,” says Steve Roach, the Boston attorney representing the officers.

For instance, the lawsuit alleges that, although YVSF is theoretically a city-wide unit, the 100 or so faces on the infamous “wanted poster wall” inside its Warren Street headquarters were always exclusively black. Boston PD includes a couple of shots of the wall, and the claim appears to be true.

And out on the street, the show gives a glimpse at what passes for probable cause among YVSF officers — black and white — when it comes to detaining young black men. In one case, Eblan and Albert pull over to question two young black men who are simply walking on a sidewalk. “You’ve got a problem, you’re squeezing your pockets,” Eblan says to one after he denies having drugs or guns on him.

In another scene, Mills notes that a young black man “won’t take his left hand out of his pocket” as he walks — so Mills hops out of his cruiser and pat-frisks him. The search yields nothing.

  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




it's great that you've built an incredible journalism career on one subject - slamming the Boston Police Department. you are exceptionally talented at 2nd guessing people's decisions and trying to paint 2000 people as racist liars. I'm sure whatever journalism school you went to is extremely proud. but if you are going to question the constitutionality of a stop, you should at least know what you are talking about. when Mills stopped the young black man, he did not search him. he performed a pat frisk of his outer garment. a pat frisk is not a search - there is a big difference. one assumes you would know this since all you write about is poor police work. that, to me, looks like some poor journalism. but don't let the facts (or the constitution) get in the way of a bad argument. just out of curiosity, do you think that these officers should be forced to partner with someone of an different race? do you think that the two black officers or the two white officers did not choose to work with each other?

POSTED BY boston02131 AT 10/06/06 1:46 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group