The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

Is the bloom off the Turd?

Karl Rove does New Hampshire
By ADAM REILLY  |  June 14, 2006

IN BLOOM: Are Karl Rove's days as the architect of GOP dominance numbered?
MANCHESTER, NH — Karl Rove was in trouble. Or so it seemed just a few days ago, when the Man Liberals Love to Hate trekked to New Hampshire to address the state’s GOP. According to recent polls, President George W. Bush — whose career Rove masterminded — hasn’t exactly been dazzling the American public in his second term. In turn, Rove may have dropped in the president’s estimation: earlier this year, following the death of Social Security reform and the disastrous federal response to Hurricane Katrina, Rove lost his domestic-policy portfolio in a White House shakeup. Worse, when Rove arrived in the Granite State, he still faced possible indictment for his role in the Valerie Plame case. And if the GOP loses control of the US House or Senate this fall, Rove’s dream of building a permanent Republican majority could be shattered.

Considering the precarious state of Rove’s career, his appearance at the New Hampshire GOP’s annual dinner was oddly low-key. He was loose and confident, thanks, perhaps, to the news (made public the next morning) that he wouldn’t be charged in connection with the Plame case. Meanwhile, a handful of anti-Rove protesters across the street from the Manchester Radisson — KARL ROVE 666, one sign read — seemed to be going through the motions. Case in point: Susan Bruce held a placard demanding jail time for Rove, but didn’t think it would actually happen. (Good instinct, Susan.) “We have hope,” she said with cheerful resignation. “Hope springs eternal!”

And it was bipartisan, this assumption that Rove wasn’t really in any serious political danger. “Putting him on the political side, I think, was a brilliant strategic move,” said New Hampshire GOP chairman Wayne Semprini, dismissing the notion that Rove’s changed White House responsibilities marked some kind of demotion. “And if there are issues that he needs to address, I’m sure” — cue wry smile — “I’m sure he has plenty of access.”

Not as advertised
Bruce and Semprini are hardly objective observers, of course. Republicans need to believe Rove can rescue the party from its assorted debacles (Iraq, DeLay, Abramoff, Plame) and guide it to victory in November’s midterm elections. And for their part, Democrats may need Rove even more. Ever since he orchestrated Bush’s dubious 2000 win, the man the president dubs “Turd Blossom” has played a key role in the collective Democratic psyche. If Rove’s really the evil political genius he’s made out to be, then losing twice to Bush stings a bit less. Even better, Rove lets Democrats pretend that their party’s recent failures don’t herald a deeper political crisis. Instead, they can conclude that Democrats just need to find a Rove of their own.

But enough political psychologizing. Whatever needs the Myth of Rove satisfies for Republicans and Democrats, it’s very difficult — after hearing his half-hour speech Monday night — to doubt that Turd Blossom will survive his various trials and enjoy the last laugh.

Watching Rove in person for the first time is slightly jarring. If you’ve read enough tributes to Rove’s political savvy, you expect a wonkish, slightly awkward man whose freakishly keen brain — tucked into an oversize bald pate topped with that wispy tuft of hair — is his one great asset.

But that’s not what you get. First off, the aesthetics aren’t quite right: up close, Rove’s seemingly babyish face has an intimidating quality — sharp nose, intense gaze — that photographs never capture. Beyond that, the moment Rove begins to speak it’s clear that his oratorical style is eerily similar to Bush’s. All the constituent parts are the same: the sprinkles of frat-house humor, the doses of angry didacticism — even the hand gestures and taps on the podium.

Who picked up whose mannerisms from whom? It’s impossible to say. But in one key area — the nimbleness with which Rove tackles big ideas — the aide easily exceeds his boss. When the intellectual going gets tough, Bush often looks like a nervous schoolboy shakily reciting a memorized script. But Rove oozes intelligence, which makes the script he delivers all the more compelling.

In that script — which, almost inevitably, will serve as the Republican Party’s mantra as this fall’s midterm elections draw closer — there will be plenty of references to the GOP’s alleged superiority on economic issues, including claims that the Bush administration’s tax cuts saved the country from financial disaster following 9/11. But it’s the “Global War on Terror” (surprise!) that’s going to play a starring role. And it was Rove’s musings on this subject that marked the high point of his speech in Manchester. Some highlights:

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Karl Rove , Karl Rove , Manchester ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Is the bloom off the Turd?
Adam, Thanks for the window into the NH GOP dinner and Rove's tactics. Rove used Kerry's early statements prior to the Iraq invasion against Kerry in the lead up to the 2004 election. So will Rove get away with the same tactic in convincing Americans to vote Republican in 2006? This tactic may have worked then, but in 2006, Bush's Iraq invasion is generally recognized by 60% of Americans as a mistake, putting us in worse position than before. Also a majority of Americans believe the Bush administration lied to push America into invading Iraq. Bush lied to Congress and the United Nations as well as to the American public. Kerry's early statement just shows that he was deceived along with the rest of America. Turdblossom will have to come up with some new election fraud tactics and I'm sure he will. The Democratic party leadership should be game planning effective counters for Rove's election fraud tactics. Frankly, I'm more worried about voter suppression and outright theft of the 2006 Congressional elections, as occured in 2000, 2002 and 2004. Republican election fraud tactics used previously will no doubt be used again in 2006. Can the Dems defend their candidates against election fraud? The Dems should maintain a pack of aggressive election lawyers and adequate funding, to file legal action at the first knowledge of slander, libel, phone jamming, purging of eligible voters and other forms of election fraud. These crimes should be considered in a seperate category, that of Crimes Against Democracy. Anyone convicted of a Crime Against Democracy should be banned for life from participation in any capacity (public office, lobbying, voting, etc.)in American Democracy. Any politician involved in a crime against democracy should forfeit their office. The convicted New Hampshire phone jammer is now out of prison conducting workshops on how to screw with our democracy. John Sununu owes his Senate office to this criminal. Sununu should step down.
By justintime on 06/16/2006 at 1:46:25

Today's Event Picks
More Information
He be jamming?
Karl Rove’s out of the woods as far as Plamegate is concerned. But what about the New Hampshire phone-jamming scandal, which involved obstruction of Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts in 2002 and had already led to the conviction of three GOP operatives? “The idea that you would have a phone-jamming operation without Rove’s knowledge or possibly his active involvement is virtually impossible,” says Wayne Slater, co-author of Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential. “But what’s also known is, it would be very difficult to prove that — and Karl’s whole record is really to hide that kind of involvement.” On Monday, in Manchester, Rove declined comment on the phone-jamming case.
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FAIR IS FOUL  |  November 17, 2008
    What's the fuss over the Fairness Doctrine really about?
  •   RACIAL HEALING  |  November 10, 2008
    Former mayoral opponents Ray Flynn and Mel King discuss how far their city’s come, and how far it hasn’t, since 1983
  •   NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD  |  November 03, 2008
    What if the election doesn’t end on Election Day?
  •   BULL DISCLOSURE  |  October 22, 2008
    As the candidates prep for the final debate, it’s a fitting time to ask: why do some journalistic conflicts of interest become scandals, while others get almost no attention at all?
  •   ROLLED  |  October 02, 2008
    Where’s the outrage over media mistreatment at the RNC?

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Tuesday, December 02, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group