LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Oh, pardon me

Freedom watch
September 27, 2006 2:39:17 PM

Forget all the hoopla: George W. Bush is still going to have to issue a flurry of pardons at the end of his term. The White House and a group of dissident Republican senators led by John McCain of Arizona may have reached a compromise on how to authorize the CIA’s controversial interrogation tactics for captured terrorism suspects. But the hastily conceived legislation — like so much recent law expanding federal statutory authority — will likely fail to do what its shills and chief architects promise it will do: control the future excesses of CIA interrogators and provide CIA operatives with immunity for excesses committed between September 11, 2001 and the passage of this legislation.

Under the bill, certain “extreme” tactics like sleep deprivation, forced hypothermia, and biological experiments would be outlawed — and rightfully so. But at the same time, the president would be given the authority to define what other coercive methods may be used, even if they conflict with the Geneva Conventions. This gaping hole in the legislation was carved out by the Bush administration and congressional negotiators in response to the Supreme Court’s June Hamdan opinion, in which the high court ruled that interrogators who violated international standards could be held accountable under domestic criminal law. As the Washington Post reported on September 25, presidential national-security adviser Stephen J. Hadley wanted to ensure that prosecution could be brought for future interrogations only, and even then only for the most clearly outrageous tactics.

But what about prosecutions for rough interrogations that occurred between 9/11 and the bill’s enactment? In August, “Freedom Watch” predicted Bush would have to rely on the presidential pardon to exonerate those officials and field operatives who tortured detainees at the behest of the Commander in Chief (“Pardons Are Forever,” News and Features, August 18). In the new “compromise” bill, there is enough ambiguity in the distinction between torture versus “merely coercive” techniques — neither the bill’s supporters nor critics can be certain, for example, whether “water-boarding” would be allowed or not — that CIA agents following the boss’s orders might still have reason to fear prosecution once a new administration takes office in January 2009. The president won’t be tossing away the pardon pen just yet.

After all, one of the hallmarks of modern-era federal criminal statutes is that ordinary people, often ordinary lawyers and judges, cannot figure out what is and is not a crime. The inability — or perhaps tactical unwillingness — of Congress to speak clearly plagues this legislation. Pardons remain Bush’s only surefire way to protect those who zealously, or at least dutifully, follow his more dubious orders.
COMMENTS

Careful there pardner... YOU sound like a terrorist to me. Don't you know that the United States is under attack? Well, it is. Yes, it is under attack from within. Terrorists are taking every opportunity to weaken the country. They hate our freedoms, and want us to lose them. They hate democracy, and want to destroy ours. And they are being more successful than most Americans could ever dream. Throughout the glorious history of the United States of America, the rule of law has been respected and upheld. Is it today? No, it is not. 'Suspects' are being thrown in jails around the world by US agents. Those 'suspects' have no rights to habeas corpus. They have no rights to humane treatment under international laws or US law. They can be tortured simply for the ammusement of their torturers. If it is to the perpetrators' advantage, they can be tried in secret courts without seing the evidence against them. Yes, the country is under attack by terrorists, and the terrorists are definitely winning. Who are these terrorists? The truth is too shocking for Americans to grasp.

POSTED BY phoenix AT 09/28/06 3:19 PM
Harvey Sivlerglate writes an article in as online newspaper as a citizen of the United States, and some cloak-and-dagger name says, "Careful there pardner...YOU sound like a terrorist to me. If you don't identify yourself as an American citizen and use your real name, the name that is registered at the CIA and the State Department-- the name that has your fingerprints and you DNA sample associated with it, then you coming into this forum as an agent of a foreign, un-Constitutional power. That make you are an anti-free speech terrorist who tried to kill free speech in public forums. If you believe we live in a free democracy, and not a Gestapo, Naza propraganda machine nation that racketeers the news of White House lies and supports the expressions of the White House's policial agenda at home and at abroad on the Internet, you should use you real name, as an America, and quit using a cloak-and-dagger name of a faggot agent of Fourth Reich Israel.

POSTED BY Marvin L Foushee AT 10/01/06 1:17 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

Best Music Poll 2008 Winners
BMP 2008 Party Info
MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group