LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

Man bites dog

Politics and other mistakes
June 20, 2007 12:20:13 PM

I like dogs better than bureaucrats. So, if I were drafting new rules regulating the importation of either one into Maine, I’d want more restrictions on bureaucrats.

That would probably disappoint those of you hoping to adopt a cuddly commissioner, supervisor, or director from a state where they have inadequate spay/neuter programs, resulting in excess numbers of them. But given how bureaucrats have spread viruses — such as the Department of Health and Human Services computer fiasco — wasting diseases — such as the financial decline of northern Maine — and plagues — such as our high tax burden — the only sensible choice would be to impose strict limits on importing them.

Unfortunately, bureaucrats in state government have shown no inclination to regulate the influx of their own kind. Instead, they’re going after the dogs.

The Department of Agriculture’s Division of Animal Health and Industry is about to propose a new rule that would make adopting abandoned dogs from other states — publicized on Web sites such as Petfinder.com and brought here by volunteer rescue groups — all but impossible. The regulation would force rescue groups to quarantine those dogs after their arrival in Maine. But none of the groups has a quarantine facility nor the financial resources to start one. They owe their success in saving thousands of dogs destined to be killed in shelters in southern states to operating under a simple system that avoids high-cost facilities and ... uh ... bureaucracy.

Responsible rescuers already quarantine dogs for two weeks, but they do it at veterinary hospitals in the South, where the potential adoptees go through health checks, are given vaccinations, and have their reproductive equipment rendered inoperative. In the last year, I’ve adopted two pooches from Dixie, and I can attest to the care they received and the vets’ reluctance to release any animal in questionable health.

That’s not good enough for Dr. Don Hoenig, the state veterinarian and promulgator of the new rules. “I have no assurance those dogs have been quarantined in the South,” Hoenig said. “We’ve been told of instances of dogs being brought in from the South that were sick.”

How many instances? Hoenig said he’s aware of “two or three,” but added that a comprehensive list is being compiled by Norma Worley, director of the state’s Animal Welfare Program. Except Worley had already told me Hoenig was doing the compiling, which didn’t stop her from making her own assessment of the situation. “We’re seeing diseases we haven’t seen in the state in 20 years,” she said.

Maybe, but the only verifiable information I could squeeze out of the bureaucracy is that some vets — nobody can say how many — have told state officials they’re seeing more cases — nobody is sure how many more — of distemper and parvovirus — diseases that already show up in Maine regularly. The bureaucrats have concluded — for reasons that escape me — that these viruses were brought to the state by dogs rescued from the South.

It’s also possible any jump in parvo and distemper has other origins. At least two Maine animal shelters have had outbreaks of parvo in the last couple of years, neither of them related to dogs imported from out of state. And distemper is common in raccoons, skunks, foxes, coyotes, and weasels, all of which can infect unvaccinated canines just by sneezing.

Determining if there’s really a problem and, if so, what’s causing it would be lots of work. Better to do something that looks effective, even if it isn’t. So, Hoenig has decided to require a five-day in-state quarantine. Why five? Distemper can take two weeks to show symptoms and parvo even longer. Maybe, five is the recommended number in the Official Bureaucrats’ Guide to Mucking Things Up.

Even the most ardent supporters of rescue groups admit there are irresponsible organizations that bring dogs to Maine without adequate safeguards. But there’s a simple way to stop that without shutting down the whole rescue system. Just require all those groups to get state licenses, one condition of which could be that they provide proof all dogs have been neutered, vaccinated, and quarantined by a vet for at least two weeks. This wouldn’t be much of a burden on legitimate rescuers, because they’re already doing it.

But licensing isn’t even under discussion in Augusta, and Chris Hanson of Hollis, the founder of Almost Home Rescue, thinks she knows why. “That would be validating our existence and giving us some say over our position in the community,” Hanson e-mailed. The bureaucrats “would rather us be ‘rogues.’”

A public hearing on the quarantine regulation will likely be held later this summer, with the new rule taking effect in the fall. After that, saving a dog from a shelter in the South will be like buying cheap booze. You’ll have to drive to New Hampshire to do it.

If you’re heading for the Granite State, e-mail me at aldiamon@herniahill.net . I could use a large bottle of bourbon and a medium-size terrier.

COMMENTS

Nicely stated Al! Bringing diseases in from other states is a problem that needs to be addressed - However, these proposed regulations are not an effective way of doing so. The undientified so-called rescues that have brought sick dogs into our state, have done so without following the existing regulations - how are additional regulations going to help stop individuals that are already breaking the law? Massachussets implemented similar regulations, which have not resolved the problem. Mass has experienced at least 3 outbreaks in the last few months of Parvo, Distemper and an unidentified upper respiratory disease. Because of the new requirements, rescues based in Massachussets that are continuing to rescue Southern dogs, have been forced to raise their adoption fees to amounts unattainable by average famililes. The result -- MA Residents are going to backyard breeders, and looking out of state for their new canine family members, either by adopting from other New England based rescues or by adopting directly from Southern shelters without having the safety net of a rescue to qualify the adoptive home or ensure each dog is properly vetted. Not only will the proposed regulations make financially and physically impossible for reputable rescues in Maine to continue, but these regulations may also worsen the problem of diseases being brought in from other states.

POSTED BY Susanna AT 06/21/07 10:17 AM
You've got a gift for putting it all in perspective, Al. That public hearing on the quarantine regulation will be held on July 16, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. at Florian Hall, 45 Commerce Street, (Department of Public Safety Building), Augusta, Maine.

POSTED BY Dawna AT 06/21/07 11:42 AM
As someone who has sent many dogs to wonderful homes in the Northeast, including Maine, I cannot see how this will do anything but help the puppymill industry and backyard breeders. Who is really behind this? I know for a fact that a board member of the AKC was helping MA pass their unsuccessful legislation. I think the breeding industry be it puppymill or "show breeders" are probably really pushing this. It will just be big dollars for them. This is a real tragedy for the homeless dogs in the South. Thousands will needlessly die while the residents of Maine will turn to puppymills to buy their pets. If anyone has any question about how easy it is to get a puppymill dog, visit the yahoo.com classified ads under dogs. If the State of Maine thinks they have problems with selter dogs from the South, wait until everyone has a genetically "off" puppymill dog. It will be great for the vets, as anyone can search and find the problems with these dogs. They tend to be ongoing issues that require lots of vet care. A thought: what do the vets think about this legislation? It will mean more money for them. Also has anyone considered how many of these puppymill dogs will end up in the shelters due to people unable or unwilling to deal with the issues, both in health and temrpament? These are issues that need to be considered, it if anyone at the top really cares.

POSTED BY jeanne AT 06/21/07 12:40 PM
My name is Shena Hodges. I am the director for Animal Haven Rescue in Fayetteville Arkansas. We are one of the very lucky shelters sponsered by Almost Home Rescue of Maine. For those of you that have never been to the South, let me explain the conditions. Due to a lack of understanding that animals have feelings too, I have seen suffering that you will never see. I have personally picked up off the side of country roads over 1,000.00 stray dogs left abandoned to get shot, run over or even worse starve to death. There is very little understanding that spaying and neutering will solve this problem. To some here animals are no more than objects. Often in the paper someone is wanting to trade a dog for tires, etc.. I have been to dog auctions where dogs are sold as bait for fighting dogs, you can buy puppies in bins as if you were shopping in some sort of dog store, where the medical vans are lined up to buy your dog for medical experiments. This is a hot spot for puppy millers trying to turn a buck and with no reguard for any suffering that happens. I personally have a Min Pin that was a breeder. They burnt out her vocal cords so she couldnt bark and made her live in a wire cage off the ground for 7 years until they were done with her and she can hardly walk. Then I personally met the wonderful people at Almost Home Rescue who have shone a warm and loving light on the day to day bleakness. These people give thier sweat, tears, hearts, and every penny they can spare to end this kind of suffering. They and other rescues like them play by the rules. They and shelters like mine will be the only ones punished. They are not the ones driving trucks down here, filling them up with puppies to drive back and make a profit. Those people dont vaccinate, quarentine, spay or neuter, or go to the vet for a health certificate. Do you really think the law breakers are going to put their puppies into quarentine when they dont abide by any other rules? Why not go after them instead of the shelters and rescues that have followed the rules. To think of my beautiful, healthy dogs sitting in a pasture waiting and waiting for a home that probably wont come makes me and others very depressed. I invite any of these people who want to pass this to come to my shelter and see for themselves my beautiful dogs, with only sadness in their eyes

POSTED BY shena AT 06/22/07 12:16 AM
I live in MA. The end result is that I have had to adopt from out of state for 2 reasons. 1. I want to give a home to a needy dog that has no other options. 2. I want to do my part to eliminate the puppy mills and "AKC" fiasco's occur daily in this part of the country due to short sightedness of our bureaucrats. I have adopted one beautiful dog from Almost Home Rescue with no behaviorial or health problems. I have also adopted two other pups from Rescue groups in TN, and NC, with no issues. I believe Dr. Don Hoenig and Norma Worley (what qualifications, and better yet, value does she have?)should reconsider their direction, and actually gather facts and figures before turning ME into another MA.

POSTED BY Kerry of MA AT 06/22/07 8:41 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR
PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group