The Phoenix Network:
About | Advertise
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

When Rupert came to Boston

Revisiting the lessons of Murdoch’s Herald
By ADAM REILLY  |  August 8, 2007


Just how badly will Rupert Murdoch screw up the Wall Street Journal?

Ever since Murdoch’s just-accepted $5 billion offer for Dow Jones, the Journal’s parent company, became public this past May, this has been journalism’s great burning question. Some predict, with a sort of anxious optimism, that the Journal’s prestige will make Murdoch tread with relative delicacy. Others size up Murdoch’s record with News Corporation, his sprawling media conglomerate, and offer a grimmer vision: the Journal will soon be a dumbed-down shell of its former self, a vanity vehicle that’s used to advance Murdoch’s own political and economic agenda and has all the journalistic integrity of Fox News, another News Corp. property.

As the tea-leaf readers parse Murdoch’s record in newspapers, The Times of London and the New York Post have been getting most of the attention. This makes sense. Like the Journal, the Times has a long and prestigious history; like the Journal, the Post is based in New York and is familiar to American readers. But as the Project for Excellence in Journalism recently noted, Murdoch’s history with American newspapers isn’t restricted to New York. Among other things, the Bossy Aussie once owned the Boston Herald — and while that tabloid and the Journal are radically different beasts, Murdoch’s Boston tenure may offer one or two clues about the Journal’s future.

11th-hour save
Murdoch’s purchase of the Herald — then called the Herald American — was an act of journalistic resurrection. On December 3, 1982, Murdoch reached an impasse with the union that represented the Herald American’s mailers; the parking lot was barricaded, and workers cleared off their desks. (The dying paper’s other employee unions had already made major concessions, including job cuts, to facilitate the sale from Hearst Corp. to Murdoch.) “I got the news about noontime that the negotiations had broken off and the paper had folded,” says David Rosenbaum, then the Herald’s assistant managing editor for features and now the editor of CIO magazine, a publication for IT executives. “We were officially out of work.”

Rosenbaum promptly went to the Boston BusinessJournal to write a freelance story on the Herald’s demise. He filed the piece and went home. Later that afternoon, Rosenbaum got a call: Murdoch and the mailers had a deal, the paper was alive, and he had work to do. He returned to the office. Just before 5 pm, Murdoch arrived in the newsroom, announced the sale, and shook hands with his new employees.

Soon thereafter, Rosenbaum continues, “the Murdoch editors arrived: Les Hinton [the new managing editor, an Australian who’d edited the Star, Murdoch’s supermarket tabloid] and Joe Robinowitz [the new editor, a Texan who’d been assistant managing editor at the Post]. And they said, ‘We’re going to show you how to put out a tabloid.’ ”

Step One was changing the layout from four columns to seven — better for packing the pages with short, easy-to-read stories. Step Two was changing the paper’s ethos, from the subdued tabloid style cultivated under Hearst to something more authentically Murdochian — edgy, sensationalistic, and shameless. “I remember Hinton saying to me, ‘Every page should look like it’s having a nervous breakdown,’ ” Rosenbaum recalls. “And that’s what we did.” (Case in point: a single page that had a political story, a piece on a fatal school-bus crash — and an item on Wingo!, the numbers game imported from Murdoch’s Post.)

Step Three was staffing Murdoch’s new baby — a process which, in the end, made quite an impact on Boston’s journalistic landscape. Frank Phillips and Brian Mooney came from the Lowell Sun; Joe Sciacca came from the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune; Kevin Cullen came from the Holyoke Transcript-Telegram. The list goes on: Shelley Murphy, Andrea Estes, Andrew Costello, Andrew Gully.

If you live in Boston and pay any attention to the local media scene, these names should be familiar. Phillips, Mooney, Estes, Murphy, and Cullen were eventually hired away by the Globe and have been some of that paper’s best-known reporters for years (Cullen recently became a metro columnist). Along with Kevin Convey, who’d joined the paper under Hearst, Gully and Costello comprised the trio known as the “Micks with Dicks” that ran the Herald for most of the ’90s. Sciacca currently runs the Herald’s local-news operation.

Talk to any member of this crew today, and they’re likely to wax rhapsodic about the heady atmosphere of the early Murdoch era. “It was terrific,” Phillips recalls. “We were a bunch of hotshot young reporters, and we thought we were running circles around the Globe. I was the one person the Herald had at the State House; the Globe had five people. They were perfectly nice and very smart — they’d gone to Ivy League schools — but they couldn’t understand Massachusetts politics because they’d never covered it.”

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
  • Liberty or Death
    Pat Purcell’s sale of CNC adds a mysterious new player to the media market
  • Leftward ho!
    How liberal can the Herald’s editorial page get?
  • Judge Dread
    The SJC’s libel ruling won’t cripple the media — but it could seriously hurt the Herald
  • More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Rupert Murdoch , Rupert Murdoch , Boston Herald ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
When Rupert came to Boston
Not to make a big deal about COPYING A LEDE, which wasn't a piece of genius anyway, but have a look: STRAIGHT UP Over the Cliff With Rupe // August 1, 2007 Lede: Is Rupert Murdoch good or bad for The Wall Street Journal? That's the burning question. (PS: The story focused on Murdoch in Chicago and was referred on Romensko's widely read site. Also crossposted on The Huffington Post. // THE PHOENIX When Rupert came to Boston // August 8, 2007 Lede: Just how badly will Rupert Murdoch screw up the Wall Street Journal? Ever since Murdoch's just-accepted $5 billion offer for Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company, became public this past May, this has been journalism's great burning question.
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 10:13:05
When Rupert came to Boston
JanH, two things. 1) Thanks for linking to your story, which I'd missed until now. 2) Since Murdoch's impact on the Journal is, in fact, journalism's hot topic du jour, is it really surprising that we both called it a "burning question"?
By Adam on 08/09/2007 at 10:50:44
When Rupert came to Boston
No surprise. What I am surprised by, however, is that you say you missed my story. i'll take your word for it, but i don't think one of my correspondents would. he messaged me: "Seems like he ripped off the entire premise -- what did Rupert do at the Bos Herald, just like you did Rupert at the S-T."
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 2:23:07
When Rupert came to Boston
PS: Don't get me wrong. Yours story is excellent -- exhaustive and well reported. Gracias for that.
By JanH on 08/09/2007 at 2:46:35
When Rupert came to Boston
That Mr. Rosenbaum no longer works for a newspaper is not a surprise. A bit awkward to write the obit for something that didn't actually die, huh? Back when Globe was less agenda-driven, institutional memory could be found at Morrissey Blvd.; now, not so much. I have yet to hear anyone postulate about what the WSJ would have been like if the absurd dividends paid to the sainted Bancrofts had instead been plowed back into the company. CEO Peter Kann hires his wife at >$1mil/yr, not a peep. In the same way that politicians say that their good intentions are moot if they don't get elected, journalists are academic if their journal can't stay in business. I have yet to hear of a viable option to Murdoch, just "Conservatives- Threat or Menace?"
By rickinduxbury on 08/09/2007 at 11:55:15

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FAIR IS FOUL  |  November 17, 2008
    What's the fuss over the Fairness Doctrine really about?
  •   RACIAL HEALING  |  November 10, 2008
    Former mayoral opponents Ray Flynn and Mel King discuss how far their city’s come, and how far it hasn’t, since 1983
  •   NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD  |  November 03, 2008
    What if the election doesn’t end on Election Day?
  •   BULL DISCLOSURE  |  October 22, 2008
    As the candidates prep for the final debate, it’s a fitting time to ask: why do some journalistic conflicts of interest become scandals, while others get almost no attention at all?
  •   ROLLED  |  October 02, 2008
    Where’s the outrage over media mistreatment at the RNC?

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in News Features:
Saturday, November 22, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group