LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

O + O = Passion

Why Obama and Oprah matter. Plus, Menino’s do-nothing approach to “fixing” the fire department
December 12, 2007 6:32:56 PM

071214_editorial_main

Obama and Oprah are the new power couple, supplanting — at least for the moment — Hillary and Bill.

America is a restless nation. And the voracious media machine that feeds our collective attention deficit disorder is chewing over the newest kids on the block with glee.

Hoopla aside, the Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey coupling packs political punch. In the simplest of terms, all an endorsement — even one from Oprah — does is focus the sights of those who respect (or adore) the endorser on the endorsee. What’s significant is not that Oprah’s candle power is so strong. It’s that her audience has substantial overlap with Hillary Clinton’s would-be constituency. Votes that come to Obama via Oprah, then, most likely will come from Clinton. Obama’s gains will be Clinton’s loss. Things rarely get that cut-and-dry in the murky world of primary politics.

Whether the Oprah factor will be sufficient to propel Obama ahead of Clinton in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina remains to be seen. The fact of the matter is that Clinton is the front-runner because she can afford to lose those states and still go on to win the Democratic nomination. Obama cannot.

In a larger sense, Clinton, Obama, and Oprah, considered in any combination and from almost any angle, suggest something bigger, more important, and affirming: the possibility of change for the better.

A look at the field of Republican candidates reveals a pack of geezers, goofballs, and snake-oil salesmen. Hard though it may be to imagine, any one of the Republican candidates has the capacity to screw up even more than President Bush has. That Darwin-denying, Bible-thumping, red-state America has a soft spot for political idiocy is, alas, all too true.

To put the Clinton candidacy aside for a moment, what makes the sight of Obama and Oprah together so encouraging is the sense of positive energy it engenders. That may sound hopelessly New Age, but not when you consider the suffocating toll that Bush’s lies and ineptitude have taken. In fact, the idea of a “new age” is rather appealing. Whatever the political consequences, the passion and optimism exhibited by Obama and Oprah are welcome ends in and of themselves.

The boundaries of gender and race are tested and expanded by the candidacies of Clinton and Obama. But this latest chapter belongs to Oprah and Obama.

More mush from Menino
In the hands of Mayor Tom Menino, inaction has become an art form. Faced with warning signs, reform recommendations, and public outcry, the mayor deftly appoints commissions, issues statements, and shuffles personnel, while avoiding any steps toward actual change or reform.

The latest example is the Boston Fire Department, two members of which had impairing substances in their blood when they were killed battling a fire in West Roxbury earlier this year, according to leaked autopsy reports. Despite this tragedy, we are apparently not any closer now to passing the sort of substance-abuse reforms that Menino has resisted implementing for almost the entirety of his more than 14 years in office.

For more than a decade, Menino has received reports recommending that the city implement drug and alcohol testing for firefighters, as well as other reforms to the badly bureaucratized and miserably managed department. Nothing has been done. But, in typical Tommy fashion, Menino has thrown up a lot of activity to distract from the lack of real action.

After a Menino-appointed “independent” audit panel recommended the obvious needed reforms in its November 30 report, for example, Menino this week touted the creation of a strategic planning committee to enact those changes.

The idea of a planning committee is fine — the department should have had such a body for years. But it’s not getting us any closer to reform.

New fire commissioner Roderick Fraser says that this latest committee will concentrate on “changes that do not require union approval.”

That leaves drug and alcohol testing outside its purview, along with most of the other recommendations of the audit panel, such as increased training, new firehouse policies, and shifting of some positions to civilians.

We don’t know what this new committee will do with its two meetings per month, but we won’t be holding our breath to find out. What will it take to light a fire under the mayor to get him to act?

COMMENTS

well as long as you're double-decking stories, let's take a look at this...the "blow" thing, the coke and smoke thing. does this mean one can no longer speak the truth in political campaigns? mr. shaheen had the audacity to address something the junior senator from illinois had addressed. i'd like to see and hear someone discuss his dismal performance in the u.s. senate along with his tragic tenure in the state lgislature where he represented a district with one of the highest crime rates and levels of neo-natal and peri-natal illness in the nation. if this is what the fellow wants for the republic maybe he should pass the bong, yes?

POSTED BY jeffery mcnary AT 12/16/07 3:51 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

The Best 2008 Readers Poll

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group