Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

The passion of the candidate

Romney’s religion speech was aimed at Christian conservatives, but his model wasn’t JFK — it was Mel Gibson
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  December 12, 2007


Pity Mitt Romney, the object of religious persecution, forced to make a public speech confronting the antagonistic forces that have kept his candidacy down by attacking his faith. As many commentators opined this past week, it’s sad to realize that, almost 50 years after John F. Kennedy’s “Catholic speech,” our nation still hasn’t gotten beyond these biases.

Haven’t we? Actually, there is scant evidence that anti-Mormon bias has held back Romney, who until very recently led the polling in both of the critical early-voting states, Iowa and New Hampshire. Although polls show that, in the abstract, people are less likely to support a Mormon candidate than one of most other religions, those same polls — including one from Vanderbilt University released this past week — show that most of that resistance evaporates when respondents learn that Romney is Mormon.

In fact, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll taken just before Romney’s speech showed that his Mormonism makes nearly as many people more likely to vote for him as less.

What hurts Romney, according to that poll, are his changing positions on important issues. Asked which candidate says what he believes, rather than what people want to hear, Romney ranked last of the major GOP presidential candidates, by a wide margin.

And yet the same media — and more important, the same evangelical Christians — who previously discarded Romney’s words as phony political calculation, greeted his “Mormon speech” as heartfelt and authentic.

“His speech was directed at mainstream evangelical churchgoers,” says David Woodard, a political-science professor at Clemson University. “They were reassured that they can vote for him as president.”

David Caton, founder of the Florida Family Association, called the speech “a grand slam.” Similar positive reactions came in from prominent Christian conservatives on the cable news networks immediately following the speech, and, according to Woodard, in churches the following Sunday.

How did Romney do it? By tapping into a deep-running sense of persecution among American evangelicals.

Whereas Kennedy asked Protestants to vote for him despite the bias against his faith, Romney, with a keen ear for the contemporary Christian right, asked them to vote for him because of that bias.

No, Romney was not taking from JFK’s playbook — he was taking from Mel Gibson’s.

Gibson turned his 2004 film The Passion of the Christ into a mega-blockbuster by convincing evangelical Christians that this was a movie that “they,” the secular New York and Hollywood anti-God elites, didn’t want you to see.

Romney now claims to be the candidate “they” don’t want you to vote for. If evangelicals rose to the bait for Gibson’s film, what’s to say they won’t similarly rally to Romney’s cause?

The parallels are striking. Gibson’s film grossed more than a half-billion dollars. Will the strategy work as well for Mitt as it did for Mel?

Faith under attack?
Today’s Christian conservatives cling to a belief that their faith is under attack from the coastal secularists who wage war on Christmas, seek to remove God from currency and the Pledge of Allegiance, indoctrinate children in evolution, take the Ten Commandments off of public buildings, and portray believers as crazed, dangerous people. Romney ran through a litany of those alleged assaults in Thursday’s speech.

“I hear evangelicals say it [that they are persecuted by secularists] all the time, and it drives me crazy because it’s not true,” says Alan Wolfe, director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life at Boston College. “They believe, ‘We are a victimized minority.’ ”

Plenty of Republican candidates speak to this fear of the anti-God secularists, but Romney brings something that others — not even Baptist minister Mike Huckabee — cannot. That is, Romney actually belongs to a religion that has been persecuted in this country.

“There is one group that could say that, and that is Mormons,” says Wolfe. “Theirs really has been a history of persecution.”

In Thursday’s speech, Romney coldly appropriated that history to connect himself with the persecution fantasies of evangelicals, lamenting that there are those who “would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion” or even “disavow” its tenets.

And who, according to Romney, said such a thing? Those who are “intent on establishing a new religion in America — the religion of secularism”; those who “regard religious freedom as something to be destroyed”; those who persecuted Brigham Young along with two early heroes of American Baptists: Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams; and those who offer either a modern Europe of empty cathedrals or else an Islamist “creed of conversion by conquest.”

If indeed there are such forces at work in America today, it is unlikely they are exerting much influence on the GOP nominating process. To the extent that anti-Mormon bias is working against Romney, it is coming from a small percentage of rabid evangelicals. That small pocket of resistance went unmentioned in Romney’s speech — they will never vote for him, Woodard says, and were not the intended audience for the speech.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Mitt Romney , Mitt Romney , Mel Gibson ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
The passion of the candidate
// Prayer and the presidency “So Mr Romney’s speech may be an early volley in a larger battle. Separating church and state is easier than separating religion and politics. As a legal matter, the US is forbidden to become a religious country. As a political matter, the question is wide open.” // FUELING HUCK FANS "Mormons must take oaths and covenants of absolute obedience to the Mormon Church," he said. "What is he going to do when the Mormon Church calls?" This does not seem to be consistent with Mitt's speech.
By Krogy on 12/15/2007 at 3:52:41

Live from Denver: Blogs, video, real-time updates at
More: DNC 2008
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   OPENING-NIGHT JITTERS  |  August 28, 2008
    The DNC’s primary colors
  •   LIVE FROM DENVER  |  August 28, 2008
    Election 2008: Real-time updates from the Democratic National Convention
  •   WOMEN ON THE VERGE  |  August 20, 2008
    Clinton die-hards have created a new-girls’ network bent on remedying decades of sexism by putting women in elected office
  •   THE UNDERDOG  |  August 13, 2008
    Sara Orozco thinks she can beat all-American GOP superstar Scott Brown. Can she convince anyone else?
  •   WILL RACE ENTER THE RACE?  |  July 30, 2008
    Dianne Wilkerson and Sonia Chang-Díaz don’t talk about the racial split in their Senate showdown, but it’s likely to make its mark

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Talking Politics:
Saturday, August 30, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
StuffAtNight Latest:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group