The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

No side bets

The governor’s gaming legislation crapped out, but are casinos still alive in a compromise? Plus, a school-budget crisis could start a political firestorm.
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  March 26, 2008

Opponents of legalized gaming in Massachusetts are celebrating the death this past week of Governor Deval Patrick’s bill to license casinos, which was crushed by a seemingly decisive margin of more than two-to-one. But the apparently devastating vote was not a reflection of stiff resistance to houses of gambling iniquity. It actually seems that more legislators want gaming than don’t. (It may, in fact, just be a matter of time — next year’s session, perhaps — before a compromise position can be reached that would likely have the necessary support to legalize casinos in the Bay State.) The question then is whether, amid the showdown between the governor and House Speaker Sal DiMasi, they and other parties have dug themselves in so deeply that they are unable to move toward middle ground.

Patrick’s bill died in some measure, according to several observers, because until the last moment the governor resisted any modifications to his proposal. Some House members would have supported it if they could have amended his bill to connect revenues from gambling more directly to local aid, while others wanted to add an allowance for slot machines at existing race tracks, turning them into so-called racinos.

By the time Patrick did open up to those options, DiMasi was in no mood for compromise — if he ever had been. By a narrow margin, a joint committee sent the bill to the floor without the option of amendment, leading to the overwhelming vote by the full membership to bury the bill for the remainder of the year, essentially dooming it.

“They used inside-baseball procedures to kill it without any debate, any amendment, any compromise,” says Tim Sullivan, communications director for the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, which favors expanded gaming.

To win the negative recommendation he sought from the committee, DiMasi reportedly agreed to allow a racino bill to come to a floor vote. On the surface, that was a big win for racino proponents, such as Representative David Flynn of Bridgewater and, crucially for the committee vote, Representative Richard Ross of Wrentham. They have seen support for their proposal grow in recent years, particularly with the reality of racino-style gambling just minutes from the state border at Rhode Island’s Twin River. (In fact, a significant number of representatives who voted to kill Patrick’s bill support allowing slot machines at existing race tracks.)

But on its own, the racino measure looks equally doomed. In the eyes of many legislators who voted against Patrick’s bill, racinos provide all of the social ills of casinos with far fewer jobs and revenues.

“The reality of the slot-machine vote is that we probably won’t win that, either,” says Kathi-Ann Reinstein, a Revere representative who strongly favors gaming in the state. (An inner-ear infection prevented Reinstein from participating in this past week’s vote, but she says she would have voted in favor of Patrick’s bill.)

Plus, a law that would allow slots at race tracks would also automatically clear the path for Indian tribes to do the same — virtually ensuring the success of Mashpee Wampanoag plans for a mega-casino in Southeastern Massachusetts.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Power hungry?, Ménage-à-trashed?, Wagering, or wavering?, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Deval Patrick, Massachusetts AFL-CIO,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 01/08 ]   Japanese Monster + Fat Creeps + Guilty Party + The Split  @ Church of Boston
[ 01/08 ]   "Third in Line"  @ Lily Pad
[ 01/08 ]   Three Pianos  @ Loeb Drama Center
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   ROMNEY RAMBLES ON  |  January 05, 2012
    Republicans are aflame with urgency about removing Barack Obama from the White House, but they just can't seem to get enthused about any of the available replacements.
  •   THE YEAR AHEAD IN MITT  |  December 28, 2011
    Here's a quick look at some key dates for Romney, and what you might want to keep an eye on when his face pops up on your TV screen. Remember, there's a lot at stake: if he wins, you get at least four more years of Mitt-watching.
  •   QUIZ: CANDIDATE OR CRIMINAL?  |  December 21, 2011
    Of the 16 passages printed below, half were written or spoken by a 2012 Republican candidate for president. The other half were written by incarcerated criminals. Can you tell the difference?
  •   NIGHT OF THE LIVING NEWT  |  December 15, 2011
    Newt Gingrich held court earlier this week at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics (NHIOP) at Saint Anselm College, as a throng of local and national media swarmed to watch him participate in an event of his own creation.
    Tim Schofield's two previous campaigns for public office seemed to prove that being the progressive darling of Brighton is not a winning political niche.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed