LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Mentally ill inmate gets care, despite state's objections

Prison watch
August 8, 2007 11:00:37 AM

A Maine State Prison “Supermax” inmate whose commitment to the state’s chief mental hospital was challenged by the Corrections Department finally is being treated there, after a judge for the second time ordered him to the Riverview Psychiatric Center, in Augusta.

In June of last year, a Knox County jury found Michael James, 24, not criminally responsible by reason of insanity for 10 assaults on prison guards, and Superior Court Justice Donald Marden committed him to Riverview, as required by law. But Corrections, following the advice of the Attorney General’s office, refused to transfer him, arguing that James should have to complete the remaining 10 years of his sentence for robbery before getting treatment.

After complex and drawn-out legal proceedings, Marden disagreed, ordering on July 18 that James be sent to the hospital immediately. This time, Corrections complied. In his decision, Marden wrote that the public (represented by the prison staff) needed to be protected from James, who had spent most of his childhood in mental institutions.

But Corrections got something, too: James’s time in the hospital will not count against his sentence — because, Marden wrote, mental-hospital commitment does not constitute punishment.

Lawyers for both sides are unhappy with what they didn’t get. Both plan appeals to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.

But James is happy. He feels he is now getting the treatment he needs.

“It’s great here,” he said in a private interview in a conference room in Riverview’s forensics unit.

He said the “respectful” treatment by hospital staff is the “total opposite” of what he suffered in the harsh solitary confinement of the Supermax (or Special Management Unit), where he had been for years.

The guards “tortured me there,” he said, adding that he got “zero” mental-health treatment in prison, even in the maximum-security Supermax’s psychiatric wing.

James took off his baseball cap to reveal, literally, the scars of his prison life: deep gouges on his skull that he said were a month or so old. He had cut himself with the edge of a table “to relieve the stress,” he said, from altercations with guards.

It is “nice and quiet” in the hospital, he said. He has his own room, watches television in one of three common rooms, mixes with other clients, makes and receives phone calls, sees family and friends during visiting hours, has signed up for classes, attends self-help groups, and goes to a gym.

In less than two weeks since his admission, his good behavior has allowed him to progress through several levels of expanded privileges.

Even in the court papers, the state did not reveal why it fought — and still is fighting — so hard to keep James at the prison.

Joseph Steinberger, one of James’s lawyers, has an explanation: “Everyone is very aware of the danger that people at the prison could commit crimes” in order to be sent to Riverview. “Clearly this is the fear the state has. But general-population prisoners are not likely to prefer Riverview, just the guys whose mental illness is being treated at the prison by punishment with solitary confinement.”

He added: “If this case puts pressure on the prison to treat mentally ill prisoners more humanely, that is a good thing.”

State officials continue to decline comment on developments in James’s case, except to announce the appeal.

For James, there is a dark lining to the silver cloud he now appears to be under. If he gets better, he gets closer to going back to prison, even if he wins the Maine Supreme Court battle and his sentence runs while he is in the hospital. He now has nine years left.

If his recovery allowed him to go to the prison’s general population, of course, he would have many of the same privileges — and possibly more than — he has gained at Riverview.

But he does not want to go back to prison.

“My goal is to stay here, get the time to run concurrent, and get a sentence reduction,” he said.

For more on Michael James, see “Arbitrary Imprisonment,” by Lance Tapley, July 19, 2006.

COMMENTS

No comments yet. Be the first to start a conversation.

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group