The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 

Defending the Herald: Diane Patrick got it wrong--updated!

Yesterday's Globe "Names" column included a nugget re: Gwen Ifill's new book, The Breakthrough, on the new generation of black politicians. After calling the flap over Ifill's role as presidential-debate moderator overblown, "Names" proceeded to pluck one--and only one--detail from Ifill's text:

One tidbit: Recalling the controversy over Patrick's decision to replace Mitt Romney's Ford Crown Vic with a new Cadillac DeVille DTS, the governor's wife, Diane, takes issue with the Boston Herald for calling the car "tricked-out." The first spouse says the description is "frankly racist. . . . It didn't have boom boxes, speakers on the outside, but they called it tricked-out." Ifill, by the way, once worked for the Herald.

Now comes a little Herald push-back, in the form of a Hillary Chabot story that quotes Herald editor Kevin Convey on D. Patrick's characterization:

Herald Editor Kevin Convey said the term “tricked out” had no racist implications.

“We’re sorry that the first lady feels the way she does, but the term ‘tricked out’ as a synonym for decorated or adorned is over 100 years old and has no racial connotation whatsoever. Moreover we meant none,” Convey said.

I don't know when "tricked out" first entered the lexicon, but I do think Diane Patrick is reaching here. I made a similar mistake myself when the Herald story first ran, positing a parallel between the Herald's coverage and Ronald Reagan's welfare-queen shtick.

But then a slew of critical comments convinced me I was wrong (scroll down for my admission of error). And I still feel that way. Remember, it wasn't just the Cadillac. It was the Cadillac, and the drapes, and the furniture, and the $72,000-a-year-aide to Diane Patrick, and Patrick's difficulty grasping why this stuff struck people as problematic.

Chabot's account says that the governor's office had no comment on Diane Patrick's accusation or Convey's response. But let's remember what the governor himself ultimately said--and did--on this particular subject. As Chabot herself reminds us, Patrick subsequently "admitt[ed] he misstepped" and moved to cover the cost differential between his car and the Ford Crown Victoria used by his predecessor, Mitt Romney.* From a February 2007 story by the Globe's Andrea Estes:

Governor Deval Patrick for the first time publicly expressed regret yesterday for spending thousands of dollars on new office decor and a luxury car lease , but stood behind his wife's need for a $72,000 aide and the effort to make his corner office suitable for visitors.

"Oh, yeah, we screwed up," Patrick told a horde of reporters, a day after promising to repay the state for office furnishings and a portion of the lease for his official car. "I am so sorry that we all have spent the kind of time we have on what we have spent time on, and I am sorry to have been responsible for that." [emph. added]

The new governor's public mea culpa came after a week of spiraling reports about his spending of taxpayer money, including $1,166 each month on a Cadillac DTS and $12,306 on new draperies in his office....

On Tuesday, Patrick announced he would contribute $543 per month toward the lease of the $46,000 Cadillac, bringing the state cost in line with the monthly payment on the more modest Ford Crown Victoria used by his predecessor, Mitt Romney.

Patrick also said he would repay taxpayers for $27,387 in furniture he purchased for his corner office. An interior designer helped Patrick select two wing chairs priced at $3,870, two couches at $4,470, damask draperies for $12,306, and other furnishings from a variety of antiques and furniture stores, including the high-end Baker Knapp & Tubbs.

Yes, there was a passive-aggressive tinge to Patrick's apology/repayment plan. ("Unless I get this off your screen," he told the press at the time, the media wouldn't "help get the message out about what it is we are concentrating on.") Still, he apologized and anted up. Hopefully Ifill mentioned that outcome in her book.

*UPDATE: My original post failed to note that Chabot mentioned Patrick's subsequent apology/reimbursement plan--for which I apologize.

  • aging cynic said:

    Good analysis Adam. It's the combination of smug superiority and appointments like the $120k/yr. real estate expert/neighbor without a job description, at a time when existing jobs are unfilled and people are being laid off, (I know whereof I speak). He told us he would be different. He isn't.

    January 7, 2009 6:00 PM
  • Dan Kennedy said:

    Are you using "D. Patrick" to help us distinguish her from, uh, "D. Patrick"? ;-)

    January 7, 2009 6:43 PM
  • Adam said:

    Hmm, good point about that useless first initial. I'd better revise...

    January 7, 2009 7:28 PM
  • Ryan said:

    Are we really still talking about the Caddy and the Drapes?

    January 7, 2009 8:21 PM
  • Hillary said:

    Hi Adam,

    Great post, and good to hear you on Michele McPhee. I just wanted to clarify one thing, I did mention that Patrick admitted his mistake at the time and made good on the Cadillac in my story today. The no comment from his office, of course, was on his wife's most recent statements.

    January 7, 2009 8:38 PM
  • Adam said:

    Hillary, I apologize. It's too late for radio, obviously, but I'll rectify online.

    January 7, 2009 8:50 PM
  • Buster Hyman said:

    To say the phrase "tricked out" is racist is like saying "Fat Albert" is an insult to overweight people. And blacks. Get over yourself, lady.

    Reclaim our nation's sense of humor!

    -- BH

    January 8, 2009 12:01 PM
  • James said:

    Hmmm ... is she saying "tricked out" is itself racist, or that it was bigoted to describe the Caddy as "tricked out" when it actually wasn't? I can't say i've ever thought of the description as having any racial connotation. I do recall, with significant embarrassment, once using the phrase in a highly misguided attempt to compliment a colleague (at a Boston-based magazine where i once worked) who had come to work looking unusually dressy. I was certainly being an oaf, but i don't believe i was being racist, since the person in question was white.

    (Her tart response: "It makes me sound like a truck or something.")

    January 8, 2009 12:26 PM
  • GL said:

    As a member of the hip hop generation and a member of the media... the term tricked out is a common term that is associated with black people and the lexicon of today's kids. That's how the First Lady interpreted.

    January 8, 2009 1:57 PM
  • Hillary said:

    Ack! Sorry for the wicked late response, but thanks for your update Adam!

    H

    January 8, 2009 8:34 PM
  • X. Globie said:

    It seems to me that the state's First Lady was mistaking "tricked out" with "pimped out" -- which itself would be a stretch to call racist, but less so.

    That said, Adam, your throwing in the stuff about drapes and furntiture seems unfair because Ms. Patrick didn't say the criticism of all those unwise purchases was racially tinged -- just the Herald's use of "tricked out."

    And for what it's worth, using the term tricked out kind of implied that Patrick was a gear head who gets greasy in the driveway tinkering with his ride. If anything, it was a downgrading of the First Family's CLASS, and not a comment on her race, that may have really bugged her. After all, look at their big fat houses, alma maters, and so forth. The Herald was, in my opinion, a bit casual with its word choice here, but not racist.

    January 9, 2009 3:31 PM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Adam Reilly's daily look at the news and how it's created.
SUBSCRIBE




Monday, February 16, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group