Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
Books  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater

Big pond, little pond

Swan Lake  in Boston and Providence
By JEFFREY GANTZ  |  May 7, 2008
NASCENT SWAN: Vilia Putrius was emotionally and technically nervous but didn’t let the side down.

Swan Lake is ballet’s prima ballerina because, 131 years after its Moscow premiere, it’s still poised on pointe. You have a woman who’s the object of two men (though Rothbart as Odette’s lover always get short shrift) and a man who pledges his troth to two women (played by the same ballerina). You wonder what Siegfried is thinking when, as he’s about to be auctioned off to his mother’s choice of princess bride, Rothbart runs on with Odile — does he think she’s Odette in a sexy black negligee? It’s a ballet that anticipates Tchaikovsky’s own life: the year after Siegfried first said no to conventional marriage, the homosexual composer made the mistake of saying yes to Antonina Milyukova. It’s a ballet with two endings: there’s the traditional one, where Siegfried and Odette throw themselves into the lake (since he can no longer break her spell) and free the other swans from Rothbart’s magic, and the Soviet happy one, where Siegfried, never mind his philandering, beats up Rothbart in a fair fight, frees everyone, and lives happily ever after with Odette in the palace rather than in some misty swan heaven. From the first note you’re not sure where you are: the oboe’s F-sharp could belong to B minor or B major. When it’s over, you’re not sure where you’ve been, whether it’s all Siegfried’s dream or yours.

Swan Lake is also the ballet to end your season with, and this season that’s what both Festival Ballet Providence and Boston Ballet are doing. (Boston Ballet is appending a “Three Masterpieces” coda, but the Swan Lake feels like the big finish.) FBP gave three performances April 25-27, with choreography by artistic director Mihailo Djuric and ballet mistress Milica Bijelic (after Ivanov and Petipa, of course), a set (from Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre) that looked very much like the one Boston Ballet used to have, and an Odette/Odile (in the performance I saw Sunday), Vilia Putrius, who used to be a member of the Boston Ballet corps. You might wonder how Putrius could go from not being offered a new contract in Boston to dancing ballet’s prima ballerina role in Providence, and what that says about the two companies. (Providence makes do with Boston corps leftovers? Boston overlooks rising star?) Putrius gave a creditable performance that was emotionally nervous and technically unstable; she didn’t let the side down, but it wouldn’t pass muster in Boston.

Of greater interest were the innovations in the story line. In most productions, the curtain remains down during the overture, rising to reveal Siegfried and his friends celebrating his birthday outside in the garden or park. Here it rose on Putrius as a young girl clad in a white shift and wandering through the forest. Rothbart swoops, and after a brief struggle the girl vanishes through the back curtain and re-emerges as a swan. At the end, after Odette has run off, Siegfried wrestle with Rothbart, breaks a wing, and breaks the spell, whereupon Odette runs back on in her shift, a girl again, and embraces him. It’s an engaging tableau and one that makes the story clearer to the audience; the drawback is that if Siegfried’s going to defeat Rothbart, he needs to do so with love, not muscle. Which means Odette has to be with him on stage, defying Rothbart and proclaiming that love that’s not perfect is still love. Here she has to be off stage changing out of her tutu.

The princess brides are another intriguing idea that doesn’t quite come off. There are just three: one Hungarian, one Spanish, and one Italian; they enter with their delegations, and each one has a solo. All three wear the same white dress that starts to blush toward the hem; you don’t notice the slight variations till it’s too late to determine who’s who — though csárdás moves eventually identify the Hungarian Princess. The trio do have a melancholy pouty-faced moment at the end of the third act when Siegfried chooses Odile: there’s lots of head shaking and shoulder slumping and commiserating. Djuric’s version, like Boston Ballet’s under Bruce Marks, has a Jester, to supply high-flying acrobatics and interact with Siegfried and his Tutor and the two girls from the pas de trois.

Other notions work less well. Djuric filled the VMA stage with a minimal number of dancers: six couples in the waltz, eight in the polonaise (with the jester and the tutor clinking cups), 16 swans in the “white’ second act. But having the swan corps swirl about Rothbart at the beginning of that act deprives Odette of her iconic entrance, and the swans of theirs, when they snake on in alternating prancing pas emboîté and hopping sautés in arabesque. (Here half of the pas emboîté sequences were replaced by walking steps, one of a number of simplifications in the choreography.) Where you did want to see the swans, lined up at the sides of the stage to flank the cygnets and the two big swans and Odette’s variation, they were absent, as if the corps couldn’t hold battement tendu derrière. The mazurka disappeared from the third act, and Odile’s variation brought music I’ve never heard and steps I’ve never seen, as if Putrius couldn’t or didn’t want to do the traditional ones. The last act lasted barely 15 minutes, with virtually no dancing for Siegfried and Odette together.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
  Topics: Dance , Boston Ballet , Ballet , Dance ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Big pond, little pond
HHHMMM...... Let's see; Boston Ballet have enough problem in the moment,and being criticized by Mr.Gantz (who by the way looks like JEAN RENO'S little brother) most surly does not lift the company morale(dancers). Also for a person who goes to see 3 shows of each program,(still just a fan to me)you would expact knowledge and wisdom on dance. At times find myself reading his critcism and feel like I am reading GOOGLE or YAHOO. Example on knowledge: Rothbart doesn’t have much to do, only big, uncomplex jumps. Well, Rothbart is the third largest character and in most versions "danced" by a character artist. And if we can all do "ONLY" big jumps that are UNCOMPLEX, (notice most dancer train for 7 or more years)in comparesment to this article I feel that Mr. Gantz your pen is a SPEAR (metaforicly and physically).
By ask_me_about_dance on 05/09/2008 at 7:41:05

Live from Denver: Blogs, video, real-time updates at
More: DNC 2008
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: JEFFREY GANTZ

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Dance:
Saturday, August 30, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
StuffAtNight Latest:
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group