Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence  |  Stuff at Night
 
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page

Why did the Suffolk DA let Rodrick Taylor go free?

The murder of Dominique Samuels
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  May 30, 2006


BETRAYED: The man police believe killed Dominique Samuels was let go by the Suffolk County DA in 2000.

Considering that he allegedly attacked a 19-year-old former cheerleader, strangled her to death, dumped her body in a park in the middle of the city, doused it in gasoline, and set it ablaze, Rodrick James Taylor has been of remarkably little interest to the media. In the days following the discovery of Dominique Samuels’s remains, the story was splashed across the front pages. But little has been mentioned about Taylor since his arraignment more than a week ago for the murder of Samuels.

A little digging reveals that the Suffolk County DA had repeated chances to lock up Taylor several years ago, but failed to sentence him to a single day. The DA’s office even halted its prosecution of Taylor for allegedly selling crack cocaine in order to protect a confidential informant that federal prosecutors were using, according to court documents obtained by the Phoenix.

On February 9, 1998, federal agents videotaped Taylor allegedly selling crack cocaine. Four months later, he was indicted on drug charges along with 40 other alleged members of Castlegate, one of the most relentless and violent gangs in Boston. (One former Castlegate member told the Phoenix he remembers Taylor but would not elaborate.)

Yet prosecutors clearly did not consider Taylor a major player in the gang: he was one of only five men charged at the state level; the others were charged in federal court. The court released him on a mere $100 bail.

Then, in 2000, with Taylor’s trial approaching, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office suddenly dropped the charges, citing a “decision not to bring forward the confidential informant to testify in this trial.”

In other words, the feds didn’t want to tip their hand by revealing their secret snitch in an unimportant case like Taylor’s. At the time, federal prosecutors were, by their own admission in court documents, shielding the identity of at least one Castlegate informant. (The DA’s office would not return calls soliciting comment.)

Just as Boston’s police and prosecutors today claim to be targeting the “impact players,” prosecutors in the Castlegate cases let go of some they considered small fish — like Rodrick Taylor — in their quest for the bigger prizes and bigger headlines. But tossing back the little fishes creates a pond full of potentially dangerous criminals who one day may come back and bite the authorities hard. Rodrick Taylor may very well be one of those cases.

Since dodging that bullet, Taylor has moved back and forth between Boston and Georgia, where much of his extended family resides.

For the past several years, he seems to have stayed out of trouble with the law. But when he was around Dominique Samuels’s age, Taylor began a three-year term in a Georgia prison for burglary, obstruction of an officer, and car theft. He was released in late 1993 and moved north to Dorchester — into the heart of Boston’s gang wars.

Since then, he has compiled a fairly lengthy, though nonviolent, rap sheet in Massachusetts: a 1995 arrest in Dorchester for speeding and negligent operation of a motor vehicle; a 1996 indictment for drug trafficking in North Adams; arrests in both 1997 and 1999 for driving with a suspended license in Dorchester; and a May 2000 charge for stealing a car. None of his offenses resulted in jail time.

On April 7, 2003, Marie Anderson, a Dorchester resident and mother of Taylor’s then-five-year-old son, asked a probate court to mandate supervision during any visits between Taylor and his son. “[Taylor] has a history of abuse against me that has required me to take out restraining orders,” she wrote.

A law-enforcement official confirms that there were several restraining orders.

Taylor also stiffed Anderson out of $23,083 in back child support — more than four years’ worth — which he avoided by filing for Chapter-seven bankruptcy in Georgia.

In the beginning of the year, Taylor’s cousins, the McCrays, sold their Milton house. Taylor came to help them move, according to his attorney, John Swomley. As a result of the move, 20-year-old Brian McCray and a female cousin moved in with older brother Martin McCray at 9 Woodbine Street, in Roxbury. They brought with them two friends from Milton who took the attic rooms on the third floor. One of them was Dominique Samuels.

Prosecutors claim that Taylor visited his cousins the night of Thursday, April 27, and murdered Samuels. He was arrested last Friday and is being held without bail.
Related:
  • Add lib
    Letters to the Boston editor, June 23, 2006
  • Zip line
    Sports blotter: "Guns and skimasks" edition
  • Cop or drug dealer?
    Roberto Pulido’s story shows how easily the divide between law-keepers and law-breakers can break down — if nobody is paying attention
  • More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Rodrick Taylor , Dominique Samuels , Cocaine ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Why did the Suffolk DA let Rodrick Taylor go free?
Sorry David, unfair article. Below the belt. No way the D.A.s office has any responsibility on this. D.A. Conley should be knocked for not doing anything about abusive police actions. A young black girl sitting in the back of a stolen car is ahot in the head as the car flees away. The world series riot report documenting assaults by police officers upon innocent civilians. Conley does nothing. Imagine the cases that don't make the press. Culture of tolerance from D.A.s office. That is the problem. Well, one of them.
By ernie boch III on 05/25/2006 at 11:14:55
Why did the Suffolk DA let Rodrick Taylor go free?
Thank you for mentioning this case. Your so right about wondering why this case has not had more attention. It's truly amazing how the media works and does not care about certain people. Very sad.
By jackie2002 on 05/25/2006 at 3:13:02

election special
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Featured Articles in Restaurant Reviews:
Monday, November 10, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group