The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In
100 unsexiest men 2009

Gen Jones rules

But will they be practical problem solvers or scatterbrains on steroids?
By STEVEN STARK  |  March 19, 2009


One of the major themes of Barack Obama's political philosophy has been that it's time for America to move beyond the Baby Boom Generation's petty partisanship. In The Audacity of Hope, he wrote that when he observed politics in his younger days, "I sometimes felt as if I were watching the psychodrama of the Baby Boom Generation — a tale rooted in old grudges and revenge plots hatched on a handful of college campuses long ago — played out on the national stage."

Once he became a presidential candidate, Obama picked up on the theme. "I think there is no doubt that we represent the kind of change that Senator Clinton can't deliver on, and part of it is generational," he said. In a key article boosting Obama in December of 2007, Andrew Sullivan in the Atlantic argued that Obama "could take America — finally — past the debilitating, self-perpetuating family quarrel of the Baby Boom Generation that has long engulfed all of us."

So Obama, even though some would technically still consider him a late baby boomer (or part of the transitional "Generation Jones" — born in 1961) became the president of a new generation, boosted by strong support among an even younger generation. In the White House, he has surrounded himself with his generational cohort, including Rahm Emanuel (two years older) and Tim Geithner (same age as the president).

By looking at the characteristics of Obama's generation, we can learn a lot about the leaders we're putting our faith in. The result? We might be on the verge of either the first "Blackberry Presidency" or, figuratively, a "Steroid Presidency."

What characterizes the Obama generation? To its boosters, like Jonathan Pontell, author of the "Generation Jones" construct, they (people born in the mid-1950s to the mid-'60s) are "practical idealists," tempered by growing up in a world in which many of their parents were more interested in self-fulfillment than they were in their children. That meant that, as latch-key kids stuck in front of the TV or left to their own devices, they had to master their own destiny at an early age the best they could.

"Where the Boomers naively tried to change the system and the Xers in a sense walked away from the system, my generation used the system to get what we wanted," Pontell told a reporter. "It's like the Boomers never realized they were playing the game, the Xers folded their cards, and my generation was wise to the game but said deal the cards anyway."

Spinning it all positively, a post–Baby Boomer sees a problem or opening and solves it. That's certainly a trait one would want in a president right now and Obama demonstrated he had it by "audaciously" running for the presidency at such an early stage of his career.

Then there's this generation's love of technology and "the new," forged in Andrew Thompson's words "out of a lifetime of upgrading from Atari to Nintendo to Sega to Xbox." Thompson, who writes the blog Gen-X Rising (, wrote perceptively of his generation (and he considers the slightly older Obama a compatriot), "We . . . were shaped by rapid technological change smack-dab in the middle of our most formative years. And that molded the way we understand the world in which we live."

Gen X is, after all, the generation that created much of our modern tech world — YouTube, Wikipedia, and Yahoo. It's not necessarily technology that "saves the world," à la visionary Boomer Steve Jobs, but practical stuff one can really use.

So far, so good. But what people have tended to forget are some of the critiques of the cultural leanings of Obama's generation.

Long ago, former New York Times columnist Russell Baker was one of the first to notice that a generation that grows up hooked on the latest technology tends to suffer from "herky-jerky brain" — or what others might characterize as a generation-wide case of attention deficit disorder. In their book Generations, William Strauss and Neil Howe also describe how other generations often find the members of this generation "frenetic," "slippery," or rather empty — driven more by ambition than anything else. Strauss and Howe relate how the drug of choice for some of the males of this generation has been steroids — literally a physical manifestation of all the pumped-up hype with which they surround themselves.

During the campaign, we heard all about the positive aspects of generational change. Are the negative ones now coming into focus? After all, the most well-known Gen-Xers who have preceded Obama onto the world stage were notorious for their uncanny powers of self-promotion that, in the end, represented style more than substance. There was Princess Di (born the same year as Obama) or even Michael Jordan (born two years later and, now that he no longer plays basketball, known mostly for his shoes).

Like his cohort, the president also can't live without his "toys" — his Blackberry and his teleprompter. But is his generation's tech addiction part of the reason why he has such difficulty focusing on the one great economic problem facing the nation, choosing instead to push a 27-part agenda?

Nero fiddled while Rome burned. The fear is that this brand new generation in charge will Twitter and text while America faces potential catastrophe. It would truly be ironic if we all ended up longing for the old, fractious days of messianic idealism, when the Boomers were still in charge and everyone had to hear about Woodstock again and again.

To read the "Stark Ravings" blog, go to Steven Stark can be reached

Related: Toxic talk: Hating Obama, California’s shame, Party like it's 1999, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Andrew Sullivan, Andrew Thompson, Barack Obama,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Re: Gen Jones rules
I was enjoying your essay until I got to this part: "But is [President Obama's] generation's tech addiction part of the reason why he has such difficulty focusing on the one great economic problem facing the nation, choosing instead to push a 27-part agenda?" I re-read the essay and found not a single mention of any data supporting your contention that he is having any such difficulty. How did you reach this conclusion?  Did you just assume he is because he is doing more than one thing at a time and thought it justified the sociological theories you described?  What you seem to describe as ADD seems to me to be a president who is smart, thoughtful, and able to walk and chew gum at the same time.  Good thing, too, because we have a number of problems, few of which can wait until the economic problem is fixed and for which the solutions, if implemented properly, will contribute to our economic recovery, both short-term and long-term. We are also blessed with a president with experience in the classroom, which I believe is why he is spending a fair amount of time explaining to us (with IMO excellent effect) how we got into this mess in the first place, knowledge that should help us to stay out of such a predicament again. I want President Obama to address many things at once, particularly when those things are both interdependent and necessary for the foundations of our future.  I suspect I'm not alone.
By JBL in Maine on 03/20/2009 at 10:05:16
Re: Gen Jones rules
JBL writes: "I suspect I'm not alone" No, you are most certainly not alone, JBL. Maybe Stark is so used to the massive incompetencies of the Bush Presidency, which featured a man who couldn't manage one thing at a time well, much less several, that it is impossible for the writer to imagine someone who can multi-task. This is not the Generation Jones rule. Generation Jones? Never heard of it. No, this is the age of multi-tasking. I'm doing a lot more than writing this response right now. We need a president who can respond to the MultiTask Generation. And, finally, we have one.
By TheArtfulDodger on 03/20/2009 at 10:51:43

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MR. POPULIST?  |  March 25, 2009
    Populism has many faces . . . but Obama's not one of them
  •   GEN JONES RULES  |  March 19, 2009
    But will they be practical problem solvers or scatterbrains on steroids?
  •   CRIMSON TIED  |  March 16, 2009
    A new battle threatens to disrupt the American political landscape, and it's hardly academic
  •   APPEARING ACT  |  March 10, 2009
    Obama's 'personal presidency' is overexposing the Commander in Chief, and painting him into the corners of the Oval Office.
  •   THE ELEPHANT ALSO RISES  |  March 03, 2009
    The GOP has a bumpy road ahead of them, but if they're savvy they'll be back in power sooner rather than later.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group