The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
vote for your favorite bands in Best Music Poll 2011

Libya: Why Obama is right

What's wrong with saving lives?
By EDITORIAL  |  March 31, 2011

 Why Obama is right about Libya
That the nation is apprehensive and ambivalent about President Barack Obama's military intervention in Libya is natural, even healthy.

America has been at war for 10 years, first in Afghanistan, then in Iraq. Afghanistan blazes on with no resolution imaginable. Iraq, meanwhile, exists in a state of suspended animation, punctuated by periodic terrorist attacks, such as the recent failed hostage taking in Tikrit that left at least 58 dead.

These days, most of the nation is suspicious of military glory — with the possible exception of senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman, who cannot seem to think of an Arab country they wouldn't want to invade immediately, if not sooner.

In his 28-minute address Monday night, Obama steered clear of heroic talk. He was sober, straightforward, and — for the most part — specific.

Obama was emphatic: United States air power was deployed to save the 700,000 people of Benghazi. Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi had vowed to massacre its residents. Qaddafi seemed to relish the idea of his troops going door-to-door, shooting civilians in a carnival of barbarity that would have combined revenge with blood sport.

International practice tends to call for a halt of genocidal rampage only after it has begun.

In 1994, somewhere around 800,000 people were slaughtered in Rwanda.

A year later, it wasn't until the Srebrenica massacre that NATO agreed to act in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Some estimate the death toll there to be 200,000.

For acting before the killing started, Obama deserves high praise. All he seems to get, however, is grief.

There are some valid criticisms to be leveled at Obama and his administration, the most significant of which focus on the president's tepid-at-best consultation with Congress.

Still, those who insist on calling the Libya mission a full-scale war need to have their heads examined. It is an action, an intervention, limited in scope even if it's of uncertain duration.

Republican hypocrisy on Libya is rich, even by GOP standards. But a new standard is being set by the likes of Rand Paul and Newt Gingrich, who seem to get away with constantly talking out of both sides of their always-running mouths.

One day the president was at fault for inaction, taking too long to decide on a course of action. Then when Obama did act, he was slammed for being precipitous and reckless.

Obama is also faulted for singling out Libya for special treatment. Why intervene only in Libya? Why not Syria? Why not Yemen? Why not Bahrain?

The people who ask this question know the answer. They may not like the answer, but they know what it is.

Western intervention might make a difference in Libya in a way that it probably wouldn't in Arab nations east of Egypt.

By pledging to keep ground forces out of Libya and by turning operations over to NATO — specifically France and Great Britain — Obama is making it plain to the world that he's not a lone cowboy. Restraint, coupled with United Nations sanctions and the blessing of the Arab League, make the Libyan air operation very different from Iraq or Afghanistan.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Interview: Daniel Ellsberg, Afghanistan: The war that's killing us, Just a reprieve? Unless Republican leaders learn from the past, another Iraq is in our future, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Barack Obama, Afghanistan, Iraq,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 04/08 ]   Alasdair Fraser + Natalie Haas + Matt & Shannon Heaton  @ First Parish in Cambridge
[ 04/08 ]   Dance Brazil  @ Blackman Theater
[ 04/08 ]   David Dorfman Dance  @ Institute of Contemporary Art
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SCUM ALONG THE POTOMAC  |  April 06, 2011
    As of this writing, a shutdown of the federal government appears to be a serious possibility. Perhaps sensible heads will prevail, but either way the Republicans now leading the US House of Representatives have been exposed as destructive fools with no interest in governing, or in the fates of real people.
  •   LIBYA: WHY OBAMA IS RIGHT  |  March 31, 2011
    That the nation is apprehensive and ambivalent about President Barack Obama's military intervention in Libya is natural, even healthy.
  •   WHAT'S BEHIND THE CURTAIN?  |  March 30, 2011
    Here's our third Gubernatorial Scorecard, in which we score Governor Paul LePage on political savvy, and on whether what he's trying to do is good policy. Note the running total.
  •   CALL FOR PUBLIC ART  |  March 30, 2011
    Seeking designs for a 36-foot-long, 8-foot-tall mural to replace a degenerate, "one-sided" mural at the Maine Department of Labor office in Augusta. Please e-mail jpgs to .  
  •   GIVE MALALAI JOYA A VISA  |  March 25, 2011
    In a display of mendacity worthy of the days when the late Senator Joseph McCarthy stifled free speech from coast to coast, the United States Department of State has denied a visa to Afghanistan's most internationally recognized activist, Malalai Joya.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2011 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group