The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures

Defaming Twitter

Illogic and Cronyism Dept.  
By ADAM REILLY  |  August 19, 2009


Hate Twitter? Then you're probably loving a new, buzz-generating study — released last week by the Texas market-research firm Pear Analytics — which found that the vast majority of Twitter messages, a/k/a tweets, are pretty much worthless. Over a two-week period, the study's authors randomly gathered 2000 tweets and then placed them into six categories of varying worth. The big winner: "pointless babble" (e.g., tweets with info like "I am eating a sandwich now"), which garnered slightly more than 40 percent of the total. "Conversational" tweets, or IM-type communications between users, came in a close second, with 37.5 percent. "News," meanwhile, was the loser of the bunch, comprising less than four percent of the sample.

But how telling are these numbers, really? Let's start with the study's methodology — which, regrettably, bears no resemblance to the way people use Twitter in real life. Twitter's great strength is that it allows users to determine, with minimal effort, both who and what they want to follow. If you do this — and pretty much every Twitterer does — you'll never encounter the terrifying info-tsunami that represents Pear Analytics' conceptual starting point.

What's more, Twitter's build-it-yourself quality makes the study's value-laden categories nearly useless. If you're following a given topic (updates about a particular neighborhood, say) or a given individual (a friend, a politician, a favorite athlete), you're going to value the ensuing tweets in a way that others don't. In other words, one Twitterer's "pointless babble" is another's "news" — a nuance the study somehow managed to miss.

Just one more thing: in a blog post introducing the study's results, Pear founder and CEO Ryan Kelly closed with an eager plug: "Since Twitter is still loaded with lots of babbling that not many of us have time for, you should check out the Twitter filter, Philtro." Unmentioned by nearly everyone who covered the study — with the laudable exception of the UK's Register and — is the fact that Philtro's founder and CEO, Paul Singh, seems to be the same Paul Singh who serves as Pear Analytics' business-intelligence expert. (Both went to George Mason, both were founder and COO of the mobile-messaging company UpSolv, and both like to be called "Mr. Metrics.") Shaky reasoning and a blatant conflict of interest? Pointless babble, indeed.

  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Business, Marketing, Market Research,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Re: Defaming Twitter
 Many of Twitter messages are automated and useless for me. I have many followers there, but rarely I can read something nice and interesting. Promotions, links, automated messages, RSS feeds...
That is the reason to search less popular service similar to Twitter, but with quality content. For example I am testing the new start-up service, that is already popular Gloggy (// and I am satisfied for now.
By MayaSte on 08/20/2009 at 4:51:04

Today's Event Picks
[CAT:CONCERTS] Laugh and Bang
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   DEFAMING TWITTER  |  August 19, 2009
    Hate Twitter? Then you're probably loving a new, buzz-generating study — released last week by the Texas market-research firm Pear Analytics — which found that the vast majority of Twitter messages, a/k/a tweets, are pretty much worthless.
  •   BRAVE NEW ADVERTORIAL  |  August 12, 2009
    This week's reminder that journalism isn't in Kansas anymore comes via a funky advertising concept showcased at  — where, as you'd expect, the contents of the New York Times Magazine are available for Web readers.
  •   MR. RESPECTABLE  |  August 12, 2009
    Last Wednesday, oft-vilified media mogul Rupert Murdoch announced that News Corp. — parent company of (among others) the Times of London, the New York Post , and Fox News — will soon begin charging readers for access to all its news sites.
  •   BIG STORY  |  August 07, 2009
    On July 30, the New York Times revealed that David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez — heroes of the Red Sox' 2004 and 2007 World Series wins — are on the (supposedly) secret list of a hundred-plus major leaguers who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) in 2003.
  •   PERSONAL FOULS  |  July 29, 2009
    The biggest story in sports media last week was the discovery of surreptitiously shot nude-video footage of ESPN reporter Erin Andrews, whose comeliness has made her a favorite — and sometimes a fetish — of the online sports commentariat.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group