The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures

After Ted

Kennedy’s death came amid renewed speculation about his succession, his family, and potential candidates for his job
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  August 26, 2009


The death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy early Wednesday morning brings to a close the life and legendary career of one of Massachusetts's greatest political figures. It also hastens the issue of succession to the seat he has held since he was elected in 1962, a topic that has gripped the state's political class since Kennedy's brain tumor was discovered more than a year ago.

That interest is more than understandable. It's been a quarter-century since John Kerry won the state's last open US Senate seat in 1984. Coupled with our local fascination with all things Kennedy, it's no surprise that Kennedy's plan for Senate succession — suggested by him in a quickly leaked letter to state leaders Governor Deval Patrick, Senate President Therese Murray, and House Speaker Robert DeLeo last week— has been the talk of the town.

If enacted, his plan would allow the governor to name a temporary replacement for a Senate vacancy, preferably one pledging to serve only for the five months until a special election for a longer-term replacement would be held.

In the strictest sense, the idea seems straightforward and uncontroversial. Current state law calls for a Senate vacancy to be filled by special election, but leaves the seat empty and the state underrepresented for five months. The change Kennedy recommended would provide a Bay State voice in the Senate for the interim, without affecting the special election. More poignantly, it would also ensure a 60th Democratic vote on the Senate floor, which is crucial for the passage of the health-care-reform legislation that was close to Kennedy's heart and supported by most of Beacon Hill.

And yet not everyone is on board. Some have voiced concern that Kennedy was trying to maneuver a hand-picked replacement into position — possibly even a family member. Others are concerned that Kennedy's proposal, even in light of his death, will be politically dangerous since it smacks — intentionally or not — of personal politics and interference.

Those latter concerns are certainly understandable.

For starters, politics was entirely behind the law being written as it now stands. Until 2004, the governor was empowered to choose a replacement to serve until the next federal election. But when Kerry was thought to be on his way to the White House, Beacon Hill Democrats yanked that power from Republican governor Mitt Romney.

Republicans at the time proposed the exact same temporary five-month appointment that Kennedy's plan calls for, to no avail. Those Republicans are now pounding Democrats for alleged hypocrisy should they adopt the change five years later. Opposition is therefore a pretty easy political calculation for the GOP — even though technically they are just as hypocritical for opposing it.

National Democrats eager to maintain their 60-vote supermajority would love to see the state adopt Kennedy's proposal. And at least according to initial polling, a slim majority of Bay Staters agree. But Beacon Hill Democrats who make the laws find themselves in a difficult position. They've been desperately trying to quell voter concerns that they run a rigged, patronage-laden, behind-closed-doors government. Changing the law for choosing a senator, for the second time in recent memory, and for obviously partisan political reasons, wouldn't exactly look like change and reform.

That political dynamic may be why we've heard nothing much about the proposal from Patrick, who had previously expressed interest in adding the appointment power, per Kennedy's wishes. Murray and DeLeo haven't really leapt to the microphones, either.

Instead, the matter has been handed to Brighton rep Michael Moran, the new chair of the Election Law Committee. Moran has said that his committee will look anew at the issue — which, before Kennedy's death, Phoenix sources inside the legislature interpreted to mean that nothing would be happening on it anytime soon.

Now nobody really knows how this change will play out. They may have wanted to stick it in a committee office and just walk away, but that might not be possible after Kennedy's death. Moran, undoubtedly, will be placed center stage.

The clan
Because it's the Kennedys, family intrigue always finds its way into the conversation. Rumors and reporting over the past year have suggested that Vicki Kennedy, Kennedy's wife, wants to inherit the Senate seat. That hasn't sat well with pols who have their own designs on it, including Attorney General Martha Coakley and Congressmen Steve Lynch and Michael Capuano. All three have boosters within the state legislature — most notably Murray, who is widely believed to support Coakley.

In what was seen as an attempt to take Vicki out of the equation, an anonymous "Kennedy family confidant" told the Globe last week that she is not interested in taking the seat, either as an appointee or candidate.

But she has not publicly made that claim herself, which has fueled further speculation. One person who has had a long relationship with the senator tells the Phoenix that, whether Kennedy intended it or not, his succession-plan proposal has heightened speculation that his wife will maneuver to succeed him. She would be the natural, sympathetic choice to cast the deciding vote on the historic health-care-reform legislation her husband held so dear. Once there, she could easily go back on any pledge to not run in the special election— after all, other potential candidates may feel reluctant to campaign against the widow.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Mitt Romney, Martha Coakley,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Re: After Ted
It's remarkable that no one - not the Phoenix, the Globe, the Herald, the Times, nor any of the TV stations, nor even the blogs - have made the connection between Ted's successor and the self-interest of Republican health insurers. It is hardly a subtle connection to link Charlie Baker, the leading Republican Gubernatorial candidate and former President of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, the state's largest private insurer, with a delay in filling our second seat, and the decisive 60th seat against a Republican filibuster. Baker & company stand to make millions by further delay in health insurance reform. And their simplest strategy is to blame Democratic self interest in changing the law of succession! This should not be surprising, given that none of the media seems to have connected Charlie Baker's job and the most contested political reform in a generation. Closing off thousands of high risk/high cost Harvard Vanguard subscribers "saved the company," but at the expense of all the taxpayers in this, the first state with universal health care. Yet to ignore the new connection between the Baker boondoggle and this modest proposal to give us an interim Senate vote, enough to quash another Republican scam and stifle another Republican's personal boondoggle is a new low in regional journalism.
By JoeBeckmann on 08/26/2009 at 3:36:08

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   AFTER TED  |  August 26, 2009
    The death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy early Wednesday morning brings to a close the life and legendary career of one of Massachusetts's greatest political figures.
  •   YOON OR FLAHERTY  |  August 20, 2009
    Boston voters will go to the polls in less than seven weeks to choose two candidates, out of the four now running, to face off against each other in November's mayoral election.
  •   CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM  |  July 29, 2009
    Nine months ago, on the heels of the Obama-assisted deluge at the polls, political observers anticipated mayoral fever triggering huge voter turnout in the Hub this fall. Now, as the race has so far been a bust, they are downgrading their expectations.
  •   SARAH PALIN, INC.  |  July 17, 2009
    Confused commenters have no clue as to the opportunities that await Palin — because few understand the extraordinary, multi-billion-dollar marketplace that has developed for movement conservatives.
  •   FROM JESTER TO ESTHER  |  July 15, 2009
    During the presidential campaign last fall, the Phoenix took note of a curious undercurrent in the annals of Sarah Palin fandom: the notion of Palin as a modern-day Queen Esther.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group