LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

This story blows

The bizarre battle over Cape Wind
May 30, 2007 2:31:52 PM

070601_capewind_main

There’s a foul wind blowing off Cape Cod. The clean-energy project known as Cape Wind makes more sense than ever, what with the mess in the Middle East and the earth getting warmer by the minute. But resistance to the proposed wind-farm — which would place 130 windmills in Nantucket Sound and provide up to 75 percent of the Cape’s energy at any given time — proves that it really isn’t easy being green. Since Cape Wind was first proposed in 2001, the project has made plenty of powerful enemies (see the sidebar “Enemies in High Places”), including Ted Kennedy, his nephew Robert, and a host of other wealthy Cape Codders who don’t want their beachfront views blighted or their sailing waters cluttered. (Opponents also cite concern for the local fishing industry and avian and marine habitats.)

Now the ongoing fight over Cape Wind has yielded a media controversy. Following the release of a new book (published on May 7) that paints the project’s opponents in an exceedingly unflattering light, some wind-farm supporters are accusing the Cape and Island stations of WGBH, Boston’s public-broadcasting behemoth, of de facto censorship. Whatever you make of this accusation, it shows just how charged the Cape Wind battle has become — and highlights just how much clout the project’s opponents actually have.

Conspiracy of silence
Allegations of a media blackout surrounding Cape Wind: Money, Celebrity, Class, Politics, and the Battle for Our Energy Future on Nantucket Sound (Public Affairs) started with a reading that Wendy Williams, who co-authored the book with Robert Whitcomb, gave at a Cape Cod bookstore, Chatham’s Cabbages and Kings, on May 16.

Before Williams’s appearance, Jack Moye — the husband of the bookstore’s owner and a wind-farm supporter — tried to drum up advance publicity for the event on WCAI, WGBH’s Cape affiliate. (WCAI shares staff and programming with WNAN, the Nantucket station, and WZAI, which serves Martha’s Vineyard; in radio parlance, the latter two stations are “repeaters.”) In early May, Moye says, he mentioned the book and the upcoming reading to Elizabeth White, the reporter in charge of WCAI’s wind-farm coverage: Moye says White told him she was eager to read the book and stopped by the store to pick up an advance copy.

A few days later, Moye says, he hadn’t heard back from White. So he contacted Georgia McDonald, WCAI’s corporate-sales director, thinking that a pledge might help his cause. McDonald subsequently visited the store and discussed Cape Wind with a staffer. According to Moye — who didn’t witness the exchange — McDonald said “one of the people at the station had looked at the book and thought it was too pointed to bear mention. I don’t think she actually used the word ‘biased,’ but that’s what it turned out to be.”

Nothing too remarkable so far. After all, reporters take a pass on stories all the time. Furthermore, Williams and Whitcomb’s book is biased — though it’s also informative and entertaining. Jim Gordon, the man behind the Cape Wind project, is consistently depicted as a visionary underdog, and the lionization of Gordon can be a bit much. In contrast, the project’s opponents — including Kennedy, whose family compound at Hyannisport is the stuff of legend — are cast as a bunch of rich hypocrites who’ve put their own needs ahead of the common good.

That said, a few additional details complicate the picture. Consider:

One of WGBH’s board members is the brother of a prominent wind-farm opponent.
David Koch, whose $12 billion placed him 49th on Forbes’ latest ranking of the world’s billionaires, sits on WGBH’s board of directors. He also helps fund the PBS program Nova, which is produced by WGBH. Meanwhile, Bill Koch — the businessman, Museum of Fine Arts benefactor/exhibitionist, and former America’s Cup winner whose net worth is a mere $1.3 billion — is a leader of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, the major anti-wind-farm group. Bill Koch has reportedly spent more than one million dollars of his own fortune on the anti-wind-farm cause.

WGBH’s Cape affiliates have a working partnership with the Cape Cod Times, the editorial page of which staunchly opposes Cape Wind.
Times editors regularly appear on WCAI to discuss stories in that day’s paper. During Cliff Schechtman’s 10-year tenure as editor, which ended in 2005, several critics (including former Phoenix writer Mark Jurkowitz) accused the Times of allowing its editorial stance to influence its news coverage. In 2005, for example, former Times reporter Jack Coleman wrote that Schechtman “won’t send his reporters anywhere that they might find people who overcame their initial opposition to windmills off their coast.”

Wind-farm supporters agree that the Times’ news coverage has improved since Paul Pronovost replaced Schechtman as editor. But publisher Peter Meyer — who lives in Osterville, Ground Zero for Cape Wind opposition, and does not receive flattering treatment in Cape Wind — still holds the paper’s purse strings.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
COMMENTS

I must say Adam Reilly, this story blows. What an apt title. I think it would have helped if you had looked into Walter Brook's site, capecodtoday.com. The censorship of public comments abound when it comes to the Cape Wind project. I found it absolutely hilarious for Brooks to cry foul over his self created 'windstorm of protest' over supposed censorship since he routinely censors, deletes, alters and publicly admonishes commenters on his ONLY pro-Cape Wind stories. Talk about hypocrisy. I was told in an email by Brooks when I stood up to his censorship "This is not a public medium. I own it and do what I like... Why don't you offer you priceless prose to CCTimes which is more your kind anyway." Then he called me a stupid woman and told me to f**k off..." Brooks has posted out right distortions of the facts concerning Elizabeth White. Not surprising for him since that is what he does. He and WW have a lot in common in terms of tabloid journalism. Brooks unlike NPR has no credibility whatsoever when it comes to his charges against others. And since when is a radio station obligated to promote anyone's book?

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 12:54 PM
And now cctoday.com is attempting to smear the Cape Cod Natural History Museum and linking to your article to do it. Do check out the plethora of articles attempting to smear anyone and everyone that decides not to promote Wendy Williams book to see how the publisher of that site doth protest too much.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 1:13 PM
Do take a look at my news and commentary piece on the Cape Wind book... //www.huliq.com/22383/news-and-commentary-on-cape-wind-book-and-interview-with-co-author-on-diane-rhem-s-show FYI, I had an email conversation with William Grimes reviewer of Wendy Williams and Robert Whitcomb's Cape Wind book for the New York Times (Who has by the way supported the Cape Wind project in their editorials). In his words "It is a bad book and badly written too". Amen

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 1:33 PM
PS. The headline and the page linking your article to a smear on the Cape Cod Natural History Museum has disappeared from capecodtoday.com This is a typical tactic of Mr. Brooks and his biased site. Now you see it now you don't. But if you would like to see it, I've copied, saved it and would be more than happy to send it to you and anyone else who might be interested. Those of us who have been censored on that site make it a habit to copy and save, not only our comments but anything that might simply disappear from view. You may agree with Mr. Brooks on the Cape Wind project but surely you don't agree with this kind of manipulation and censorship, hopefully.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 4:23 PM
Dona, I'd love to look at the Cape Cod Today post. Could you please email it to me at areilly@thephoenix.com? Thanks.

POSTED BY Adam AT 05/31/07 5:19 PM
Be happy to. It is on its way. But, how many posts would you like to see? There is quite a long list of them now. :) All attempting to smear and bully anyone who doesn't wish to promote Wendy Williams book. Have you promoted it yet?

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 05/31/07 5:42 PM
Just an update for you Adam. Brooks has now altered the link to this post so it only views as the printer friendly version without the comments. He is the king of censorship. Perhaps you might write another article showing more than a one-sided version that slams good people for standing up for their constitutional rights? If Wendy Williams and Robert Whitcomb had done that perhaps their book might have had some journalistic integrity.

POSTED BY Dona Tracy AT 06/01/07 7:37 AM
Great piece for letting people know that deep pockets and even organizations like the Nature Conservancy which has a lot of (clout__private wealthy doners) have continued to twist this into a "marine threat" and "blight" when in fact the size from shore is no larger than a small dot. I was surprised when I had applied for a job downtown and discovered that this not for profit organization purports to help the environment when most of their effort has been the side " at least in this issue of Cape Wind" 180 degrees in the opposite stance. Letting my views be known during the interview about the Cape Wind it was no surprise to me that they never called me back for another interview. OOPS, but I figured eventually this would come to a head and it has. Thanks to Wendy and the insightful article. Thomdar

POSTED BY thomdar AT 06/05/07 11:26 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

More
ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group