LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

Ebbing radicalism in Cambridge

Left behind
July 25, 2007 4:33:45 PM
inisdeCorny-lady
CÒMO SE DICE: tedious en español?

When conservatives obsess over the People’s Republic of Cambridge, this is the kind of thing they have in mind. The place: the Women’s Center on Pleasant Street, a fragrance-free, man-free (usually) spot whose walls boast fliers for female drum circles and LGBT support groups. The event: a press conference by one Walda Barrios, a candidate for the Guatemalan vice-presidency who’s running on the ticket of URNG-MAIZ, a leftist political party with revolutionary roots.

To National Review types, it’s a scenario that oozes menace: a female Che drumming up support for her perfidious cause amid fellow radicals . . . right here in the United States. But this grim vision doesn’t quite square with Barrios’s visit to the Women’s Center this past Monday — which, simultaneously, was a major snooze fest and a compelling piece of evidence that Cambridge leftism isn’t what it used to be.

A few minutes after the designated 11 am start time, Barrios, a kind-looking woman clad in an URNG-MAIZ halter top (message in Spanish: My heart is on the left!) and clunky red jewelry, was chatting up a local Spanish-language journalist. Ten or so people milled around waiting for the main event: Barrios’s handlers, a couple reporters, some Women’s Center staffers. Rene Van Rompay, a former Catholic missionary who runs Boston’s Guatemala Solidarity Committee, approached this reporter and spoke about Barrios’s politics and the recent rise of the Latin American left. Then, after a few minutes, he segued into a wistful remembrance of the good old days. “At one time, we had an umbrella organization called CASA, with a small office in Harvard Square,” he recalled. “For a couple years, we had [committees] for Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Cuba . . . ” No more: Van Rompay’s group still meets in Cambridge, but the other groups and the Harvard Square office are long gone.

A few minutes later, Barrios began delivering her remarks in Spanish; a translator promptly rendered them into English. At first, the small crowd — most of whose members looked to be 60 or older — listened attentively: when Barrios finished a particular point, they smiled and nodded encouragingly.

Soon, though, the group’s collective enthusiasm seemed to wane. If the language barrier and the audience’s average age were partly responsible, so was Barrios’s lack of rhetorical flair: she spoke by leafing through URNG-MAIZ’s 30-page governing program, arbitrarily picking out parts to discuss. Occasionally, this led Barrios to an interesting topic (violence against women, the use of Guatemala’s military as a domestic police force). Most of the time, though, it made for mind-bogglingly dry speechifying (the anthropological significance of URNG-MAIZ’s corn logo, something called the “democratic sustainable territorialization of communities”). As the minutes passed, one older woman struggled not to fall asleep, then got up and left the room. The smiles grew slightly strained. Even Dave Goodman, co-host of WMBR-FM’s Radio with a View program, looked to be growing restless.

Finally, after more than an hour, Barrios wrapped up her spiel. Van Rompay called for questions. I ventured one: why, exactly, had Barrios decided to come to Cambridge? Her response suggested that she didn’t understand the question or couldn’t answer it: she was in the United States, Barrios answered, to foster cross-cultural dialogue and connect with Guatemalan immigrants. So much for the People’s Republic.

COMMENTS

Wow! Thanks for the mention Adam. Just doing my job. I agree, it was a very long presention by Walda Barrios, and if I was "growing restless" it had a lot to do with my sitting on the Women's Center floor with my recorder for more than 90 minutes. Ms. Barrios could definitely use some coaching in the area of public speaking. But please don't use my fidgeting to help prove your argument that Cambridge activism is in a rut. In fact, the truth is just the opposite: many individuals and groups in Cambridge are working on national issues such as impeachment of Bush and Cheney and state and local concerns such as alternatives to toxic industrial chemicals. Even CISPES, the group that has advocated so well over the years for the people of El Salvador is attempting a resurgence; unfortunately because of the recent arrest and detention of peaceful protesters in that country. As far as the other Latin American "committees:" many were based in the Old Cambridge Baptist Church on Harvard Street and were constantly burgled - we now know by COINTELPRO agents of the US government. That and the evolving list of critical issues (the environment, the Iraq war and stolen elections in the U.S., global trade, etc.) have contributed more over time to the differences in attitudes towards how to spend limited time and money on activsm. By the way, calling Cambridge "The People's Republic" has for me always had a perjorative feel to it. I try not to use it, just as I try not to use phrases such as "politically correct" that have totally been co-opted by the right wing. Respectfully, Dave Goodman, "RADIO with a VIEW"

POSTED BY David Goodman AT 07/27/07 4:39 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group